1. María Camila Luna Pablo Santizo Matheu Zachary Borden Zachary Delurey ENIORDESIGNENIORDESIGN

2. Project Background Desired State Tentative Schedule Risk Management Current Design Problem Statement Functional Decomposition

3. Project Background  An imaging target is a hard-copy image that contains known information that is used to calibrate the device.  Common uses:  Medical  Scientific  Cultural Heritage

4. Imagine Targets Have been used for over 50 Years Different sizes for different applications Test Color Resolution Contrast Depth of field Distortion Project Background

5.  Certain applications require smaller color targets  Complications:  forming component parts  customization requests  final target assembly  Current process:  hand assembled  improper alignment  low yields  The objective:  optimize or redesign the manufacturing process  lower costs  higher yields  improve customization ability Problem Statement

6. Laser cutting the color sheets into long strips Strips are butted together and cross cut to form a single row Rows are aligned and adhesive is placed on the back side They are placed in a protected metal base (with a company’s logo) Current Design

7. Stakeholders IS A Customers SD Team Don Williams Operator Susan Farnand

8. Customer Need ImportanceDescription CN13Color materials are spectrally accurate. CN22 Individual patches are blemish free to provide accurate measurements. CN33Individual patches are aligned. CN42Durable base plate. CN52Logo of the company on the back of the plate. CN63Targets do not have burn marks or surface cracks. CN71Targets are resistant to alcohol and water. CN83Colors are easily and quickly customized. CN91Target sizes are easily customized. CN102Fast production time. CN113Low production cost. CN123Low cost system redesign. CN133High yield rates. Desired State- Customer Needs

9. Desired State- Engineering Requirements S#SourceFunction Specification (Metric) Unit of Measure Marginal Value Ideal Value Comments/Status S1CN4Base designDurability (drop test)Feet3ft>3ft Drop from 3ft without making the surface crack or target break S2CN9Base designTarget size# of sizes3 sizesinf. Only 3 sizes available currently S3CN3 Individual patches Positional accuracy with respect to tile size %5%<5% S4CN5Base designLogo is presentPass/FailPass S5CN2/CN6/CN7Targets Percent damaged surface %5?0 Separate test for alcohol/water S6CN8 Individual patches Number of patches that can be changed #30 S7CN8 Individual patches Time to change color scheme Min.?? S8CN10SystemCycle timeMin.15<15 S9CN11SystemProduction CostDollars?? S10CN12System System Redesign Budget Dollars?? S11CN13SystemYield Rate%??Currently at 75%

10. Desired State- Matrix Eng. Requirements S1S2S3S4S5S6S7S8S9S10S11 Customer Needs Priority Base Design Durability Available Base Design Sizes Individual Patch Alignment Base Design logo is present Target percent damaged surface Individual patches that can be changed Time that takes to change color System Cycle time System Production Cost System redesign budget System yield rate CN1 Color materials are supplied from Munsell Div. of X-Rite, Inc. 3 CN2 Individual patches are blemish free to provide accurate measurements. 2 x CN3 Individual patches are aligned. 3 x CN4 Durable base plate 2 x CN5 Logo on back of plate 2 x x CN6 Targets do not have laser burns or surface cracks 3 x CN7 Targets are resistant to alchohol and water 1 x CN8 Colors are easily and quickly customized 3 xx CN9 Target sizes are easily customized 1 x CN10 Fast production time 2 x CN11 Low production cost 3 x CN12 Low cost system redesign 3 x CN13 High yield rates 3 x

11. Tentative Schedule

14. No.RiskMitigation Plan 1 Misunderstandings with the customer and within team members Keep team members and customer informed of all decisions taken and any changes in scope 2 Unable to meet deadlines/milestones Meet with sufficient time before each deadline to solve any issues 3 Expensive alternatives to current process Innovate with lower cost technologies 4 Alignment or cutting system damage color surfaces Test systems before committing resources to it. Change system if it is damaging surfaces 5Process is not ergonomic Perform studies of the process and find alternatives to help the ergonomics for example new layout for tools 6 Adhesive does not allow for re- allignment Perform a pass/fail test of alignment before putting the adhesive. Change the adhesive to allow for movement after applied (slow cure) Risk Management

15. Functional Decomposition Produce properly aligned, highly customizable, color targets that will allow us to calibrate digital devices Obtain color papers Choose specific colors(customer request) Cut paper to desired size Position paper on cutter Protect paper from cutting process Align patches within tolerances Identify pattern according to customer order Vertically and horizontally align patches Secure colors in place Prevent patches from shifting Protect target from damage

16. Issues and Corrective Actions Questions?