1. Population Ecology I. Attributes II.Distribution III. Population Growth – changes in size through time IV. Species Interactions V. Dynamics of Consumer-Resource Interactions VI. Competition VII. Mutualisms

2. A. Overview 1. Dynamics - NET fitness benefit to both populations - diffuse (many partners) or species specific - facultative (not necessary) or obligate - strength of feedback loop depends on the degree of “obligateness”

3. A. Overview 1. Dynamics 2. Historical Importance - endosymbiotic origin of Eukaryotes

4. A. Overview 1. Dynamics 2. Historical Importance - endosymbiotic origin of Eukaryotes - symbiotic origin of multicellularity

6. A. Overview 1. Dynamics 2. Historical Importance - endosymbiotic origin of Eukaryotes - symbiotic origin of multicellularity - symbiotic efficiencies in energy harvest by nearly all life forms

7. Corals and zooxanthellae Gleaners Aphid farming by ants Frugivory Pollination Protozoans in Termites

8. A. Overview 1. Dynamics 2. Historical Importance - endosymbiotic origin of Eukaryotes - symbiotic origin of multicellularity - symbiotic efficiencies in energy harvest by nearly all life forms - at planetary scale, there are complementary and dependent roles

9. White – increase reflectance, lower temperature of planet. White flower doesn’t overheat, but doesn’t work well at low temps. Black – increase absorption, increase temperature of planet. Work well at low temps, but overheat at high temps.

10. A. Overview 1. Dynamics 2. Historical Importance 3. Cultural Resistance science culture CompetitionCooperation masculinefeminine CapitalistSocialist Hard work, innovation, and winning are rewarded All win, so hard work is not worth it “natural” – social Darwinism

11. dN 1 /dt = rN 1 ((K 1 -N 1 + aN 2 )/K 1 ) dN 2 /dt = rN 2 ((K 2 -N 2 + bN 1 )/K 2 ) A. Overview B. Modeling Mutualism Effect of second species increases population growth

12. N2 reaches its K when N1 = 0. But N2 > K when N1 > 0. N1 increases (beneath its K), but N2 declines because there aren’t enough N1’s to allow N2 to maintain this large a population. Both get bigger and bigger (run-away)

13. Stable equilibrium – both maintained at a stable equilibrium above K.

14. Obligate mutualism – a minimum number of partners are required to maintain a population above zero. So, there needs to be at least 50 N2 individuals for N1 to grow (above its isocline). To sustain more N1 individuals, more N2 are needed.

15. So here, there are 170 N2 individuals and that’s enough for the 5 individuals In the N1 population to grow. However, with only 5 N1 individuals, N2 declines. This eventually causes a decline in N1, as they are obligate mutualists.

16. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

17. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients 1-Esophagus 2-Stomach 3-Small Intestine 4-Cecum (large intestine) - F 5-Colon (large intestine) 6-Rectum Low efficiency - high throughput...

18. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

19. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

20. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

21. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

22. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

23. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients

24. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients Rhizobium bacteria fix nitrogen, breaking N 2 into N, which reacts with water and oxygen to form NO 2 and NO 3 that can be absorbed by plant. Infect legumes; plant provides sugars.

25. C. Types of Mutualism Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients Ectomycorrhiza and “Endo”- or arbuscular mycorrhizae

26. Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrientss Lichens – an alga and a fungus

27. Trophic Mutualisms – help one another get nutrients Mixed foraging flocks

28. Defensive Mutualisms – Trade protection for food

29. Ants ‘farm’ the fungus, culturing it on a chewed-leaf mulch.

30. Acacia and Acacia ants Defensive Mutualisms – Trade protection for food

31. Induced and Constitutive Defenses in Acacia. The species in the right-hand column have mutualistic relationships with ant species - the ants nest in the thorns. Those on the left can attract ants with extra-floral nectary secretions, but the ants do not nest. The Acacia species on the left increase their nectar secretions after damage, inducing wandering ants to come visit and stay a while. The species on the right have to support the ant colonies all the time, and nectar production is uniformly high and unaffected by damage.

32. Induced and Constitutive Defenses in Acacia. The species in the right-hand column have mutualistic relationships with ant species - the ants nest in the thorns. Those on the left can attract ants with extra-floral nectary secretions, but the ants do not nest. The Acacia species on the left increase their nectar secretions after damage, inducing wandering ants to come visit and stay a while. The species on the right have to support the ant colonies all the time, and nectar production is uniformly high and unaffected by damage. WHICH CAME FIRST??

33. Induced and Constitutive Defenses in Acacia. Induced defenses first, then the obligate relationship evolved…

34. Fig. 1. Rewards produced in the presence (white bars) and absence (gray bars) of large herbivores by A. drepanolobium occupied by different species of Acacia ants. Ant species' abbreviations are indicated as: Cs, C. sjostedti; Cm, C. mimosae; Cn, C. nigriceps; Tp, T. penzigi. Todd M. Palmer, Maureen L. Stanton, Truman P. Young, Jacob R. Goheen, Robert M. Pringle, Richard Karban. 2008. Breakdown of an Ant-Plant Mutualism Follows the Loss of Large Herbivores from an African Savanna. Science 319:192-195. Plants produce fewer rewards when large herbivores are absent and herbivory rates are LOWER. Bribing ants to stay and protect them is less important.

35. Todd M. Palmer, Maureen L. Stanton, Truman P. Young, Jacob R. Goheen, Robert M. Pringle, Richard Karban. 2008. Breakdown of an Ant-Plant Mutualism Follows the Loss of Large Herbivores from an African Savanna. Science 319:192-195. Fig. 2. The proportion of host trees occupied by the four Acacia-ant species in the presence of large herbivores (white bars) and in plots from which large herbivores had been excluded (gray bars) for 10 years. And if large herbivores are excluded and plants produce less nectar, then some ants abandon the trees (the mutualist).

36. Todd M. Palmer, Maureen L. Stanton, Truman P. Young, Jacob R. Goheen, Robert M. Pringle, Richard Karban. 2008. Breakdown of an Ant-Plant Mutualism Follows the Loss of Large Herbivores from an African Savanna. Science 319:192-195. Fig. 3. Average annual growth (white bars ± SEM) and cumulative mortality (gray bars) for host trees occupied by the four Acacia-ant species over an 8-year observation period. Average annual growth increments were calculated for trees continuously occupied over an 8-year period by each ant species, with n = 158, 192, 162, and 75 for trees occupied by C. sjostedti, C. mimosae, C. nigriceps, and T. penzigi, respectively.

37. “Our results indicate that the large herbivores typical of African savannas have driven the evolution and maintenance of a widespread ant-Acacia mutualism and that their experimentally simulated extinction rapidly tips the scales away from mutualism and toward a suite of antagonistic behaviors by the interacting species. Browsing by large herbivores induces greater production of nectary and domatia rewards by trees, and these rewards in turn influence both the behavior of a specialized, mutualistic ant symbiont and the outcome of competition between this mutualist and a non-obligate host-plant parasite. Where herbivores are present, the carbohydrate subsidy provided by host trees plays a key role in the dominance of the strongly mutualistic C. mimosae, which is consistent with the hypothesis that plant exudates fuel dominance of canopy ant species that are specialized users of these abundant resources (28). In the absence of large herbivores, reduction in host-tree rewards to ant associates results in a breakdown in this mutualism, which has strong negative consequences for Acacia growth and survival. Ongoing anthropogenic loss of large herbivores throughout Africa (29, 30) may therefore have strong and unanticipated consequences for the broader communities in which these herbivores occur.”282930 Todd M. Palmer, Maureen L. Stanton, Truman P. Young, Jacob R. Goheen, Robert M. Pringle, Richard Karban. 2008. Breakdown of an Ant-Plant Mutualism Follows the Loss of Large Herbivores from an African Savanna. Science 319:192-195.

38. Defensive Mutualisms – Trade protection for food Ants ‘farm’ aphids and drink their ‘honeydew’

39. Cleaning Mutualisms – Trade cleaning for food

41. And watched cleaners cheat less. Fish visit non-cheating cleaners more

42. Dispersive Mutualisms – Trade dispersal for food

44. Orchids, Euglossine Bees, and Wasps.

45. Dispersive Mutualisms – Trade dispersal for food

46. Not mutualism (commensal or parasitic)

47. Population Ecology I. Attributes II.Distribution III. Population Growth – changes in size through time IV. Species Interactions V. Dynamics of Consumer-Resource Interactions VI. Competition VII. Mutualisms VIII. Evolutionary Responses to Species Interactions Why won’t this population unit end?

49. Population Ecology I. Attributes II.Distribution III. Population Growth – changes in size through time IV. Species Interactions V. Dynamics of Consumer-Resource Interactions VI. Competition VII. Mutualisms VIII. Evolutionary Responses to Species Interactions The abiotic environment is often stable, or at least predictable. Other species in the environment are always changing, sometimes as a direct result of changes in other species.

50. “Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place. If you want to get somewhere else, you must run at least twice as fast as that!”

51. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - crypsis and detection

52. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - crypsis and detection

53. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - crypsis and detection

54. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - crypsis and detection

55. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - crypsis and detection

56. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - poisons and detoxification

57. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - poisons and detoxification

58. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - poisons and detoxification

59. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - poisons and detoxification

60. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - Mimicry “Batesian” mimicry – palatable mimic looks like a toxic/dangerous model

62. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: One species is evolving to ‘escape’ the relationship, the other to enhance it. “Arms Race” - Mimicry “Batesian” mimicry – palatable mimic looks like a toxic/dangerous model “Mullerian” mimicry – toxic species resemble one another

64. Plant “crypsis” and “mimicry” Heliconia and Passiflora

65. Plant “crypsis” and “mimicry” Heliconia and Passiflora

66. Host-pathogen “arms races”

67. Flies always new Flies reproduced/evolved over time

69. Coevolution in Consumer-Resource Relationships: Coevolution of Competitors - competitive ability can evolve

70. Coevolution of Competitors - competitive ability can evolve - can result in character displacement

71. Relationships change…