Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ” Accountability Data 2013 Raising the Standard.

Published bySherman Snow Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ” Accountability Data 2013 Raising the Standard."— Presentation transcript:

1 Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ” Accountability Data 2013 Raising the Standard

2 2012 -2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Language Arts ScoreMinimalBasicProfAdvQDI District8.2319.1145.3327.24190 ECUE154.7 6.4220.1848.1725.23192 SMEE155.2 7.1021.8939.0531.95195 SMNE155.2 9.7410.3950.6529.22199 VUE152.8 10.2922.8642.8624.0181

3 2012 - 2013 3rd Grade MCT2 Math ScoreMinimalBasicProfAdvQDI DISTRICT 2.5115.6450.4231.42208 ECUE159.5 1.85115755.5631.02214 SMEE159.8 3.5314.1245.8836.47215 SMNE159.4 1.9516.2345.4536.36216 VUE156.8 2.8621.7152.5722.86196

4 2012 - 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Language Arts ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT7.5124.4744.7423.27184 ECUE153.81 7.5322.5846.7723.12186 SMUE153.40 8.2423.6644.8023.30182 VUE153.82.3 6.5326.6343.2223.62184

5 2012 – 2013 4th Grade MCT2 Mathematics ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT5.7115.6462.8615.79187 ECUE156.2.5 4.8614.0566.4914.59190 SMUE156.3.5 5.7314.7063.0816.49190 VUE155.81.9 6.5317.5959.8016.08186

6 2012 - 2013 5 th Grade Language Arts ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT7.9323.2054.1814.70174 ECUE152.90.7 7.8524.6152.3615.18175 SMUE153.91.1 6.4321.2257.2315.11181 VUE152.7-0.5 10.2224.1951.6113.98 169

7 2012 - 2013 5 th Grade Mathematics ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT5.7718.4752.0923.67192 ECUE157.53.2 4.7115.7155.5024.08199 SMUE156.22.2 5.4819.0350.9724.52194 VUE155.31.5 7.53204350.022.04186

8 2012 – 2013 Grade 5 Science (MST) ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT5.2217.2546.6730.87202 ECUE157.1n/a 3.7011.6452.3832.28213 SMUE155.8n/a 5.1918.8342.5333.44204 VUE154.2n/a 6.4220.3247.0626.20193

9 2012 - 2013 6th Grade Language Arts ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT5.8923.4258.4912.19176 ECMS154.32.6 4.5023.5062.509.50177 SMMS156.94.7 3.9818.9659.9417.13191 VMS151.2-0.4 10.1029.8053.037.07157

10 2012 - 2013 6th Grade Mathematics ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT9.6319.2654.3316.78176 ECMS152.4-1.3 9.0922.2258.5910.10167 SMMS155.31.6 8.5918.1053.6819.63184 VMS154.01.0 11.1118.1851.5219.19179

11 2012 - 2013 7th Grade Language Arts ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT9.9919.6964.086.24166 ECMS151.3-0.4 15.2024.5152.947.35153 SMMS154.01.1 8.6416.6768.526.17172 VMS154.01.3 5.7920.2268.955.26174

12 2012 - 2013 7th Grade Mathematics ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT13.7319.1449.2417.89170 ECMS152.2-1.1 16.6722.5543.6317.16161 SMMS154.1-0.8 12.0416.0552.2516.67174 VMS153.8-0.7 13.1620.5345.2621.05177

13 2012 - 2013 8th Grade Language Arts ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT9.3229.8850.4410.36159 ECMS152.1-0.7 9.9426.6357.796.53162 SMMS152.50.6 9.0631.7146.3412.89162 VMS152.1-0.6 10.0530.1649.2110.58160

14 2012 - 2013 8th Grade Mathematics ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT9.0114.4853.6222.90187 ECMS155.91.5 6.5316.0854.2723.12194 SMMS156.22.9 9.0313.5450.3527.08195 VMS154.10.3 11.6413.7658.216.40180

15 2012 – 2013 Grade 8 Science (MST) ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI DISTRICT9.6218.9351.1820.27180 ECMS153.7n/a10.9518.9152.7417.41 177 SMMS154.7n/a 9.0915.7353.8521.33187 VMS153.9n/a 9.0423.4045.7421.81180

16 2012 - 2013 8th Grade Algebra I ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI ECMS667.3-4.3 008.7091.30291 SMMS671.7 000100300 VMS671.8-1.2 005.8894.12294

17 2012 - 2013 Algebra I (High School) ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI 3.826.8840.6748.62234 ECHS659.72.1 1.329.9340.4048.34236 SMHS6571.4 7.417.0450.7434.81213 VHS661.14.4 1.795.9538.1054.17245

18 2012 – 2013 English II ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI 9.8314.2647.5428.37194.4 ECHS655.13.8 9.2913.1148.6328.96197 SMHS654.52.7 10.2915.0745.5929.04194 VHS655.01.5 9.8313.8749.7126.59193

19 2012 – 2013 Biology I ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI 4.1712.3558.1025.38198.7 ECHS659.27.4 3.0111.4557.2328.31210 SMHS655.64.1 7.5615.9758.8217.65188 VHS660.57.2 1.048.8557.8132.29222

20 2012 – 2013 U.S. History ScoreGRMinBasicProf.Adv.QDI 13.7918.7744.6422.80176.5 ECHS651.3n/a 13.3316.046.6724.0181 SMHS649.3n/a 16.422.8040.020.80165 VHS652.3n/a 8.3314.1752.5025.0195

21 ACT Five Year Trend MS and JCSD

22 ACT ~ Five Year Trend 2013 JCSD 20.8 (.6 net gain over five years)

23 Accountability Overview 2013 The 151 districts in the state are ranked as listed below: A – 18 (including Corinth – Excellence for All Pilot) B – 45 (including Gulport) – Excellence for All Pilot) C – 36 D – 37 (including Clarksdale – Excellence for All Pilot) F – 15

24 Accountability 2013 The JCSD Overall District Accountability Label is: B QDI is 188 (up from 182 last year) Met Growth (0.183) Graduation Rate is: 4 year: 81.0 5 year: 78.8

25 2013 School Level Accountability Labels The following is a list of the schools who were assigned an accountability label. VHS217 ( ↑ 213) Met (0.601)A ECHS209 (↓ 213) Met (0.581)A ECUE 196 ( ↑ 183) Met (0.195)B SMUE190 (↑179) Met (0.129)B SMHS192 ( ↓ 196) Met (0.228)B SMMS186 (↑184) Met (0.216) B VMS185 (↑180) Met (0.015)B VUE185 (↑ 176) Met (0.169)B ECMS181 (↑179) Met (0.006)B SMEE206 (↑ 202) N/ANot Assigned SMNE205 (↑183) N/A Not Assigned

26 Jackson County School District Graduation Rate is 81.0 (4 year). 2009 - 70.4 % 2010 - 75.6 % 2011 – 76.4 2012 – 77.3

27 2013 Jackson County School District Individual High School Graduation Rates and HSCIs Grad RateHSCI Vancleave High2013: 4 year – 76.7 5 year: 79.12013 – 204.9 2012 – 75.5 2012 – 185 2011 - 75.3 2011 - 189.8 St. Martin High 2013: 4 year – 81.5 5 year – 73.02013 – 187.1 2012 – 75.6 2012 - 194 2011- 76.9 2011- 194.6 East Central High2013: 4 year - 83.7 5 year: 87.0 2013 - 237.0 2011 - 76.9 2011 - 190.6 2012 - 81.5 2012 - 209

28 HSV – High School Value Prior to 2013, in order to be assigned a label of A, schools and districts had to meet growth and have a QDI of 200 or above. This year, however, another number -- high school value (HSV) -- took both QDI and graduation rates into account, and if a district scored a 280 or above with that figure, they could be an A school whether or not their QDI reached the 200 mark.

29 2013 JCSD Data as Compared to Coastal Area School Districts DistrictAccountability LabelQDI/HSVGrowth Pass Christian A 213/301 Met Biloxi A 206/292 Met Ocean Springs A 198/284 Met Long BeachA 198/282 Met HancockB 191/271 Met JCSD B 188/269 Met Bay/WavelandB 186/274 Met Harrison B 185/261 Met George County B 179/260 Met PascagoulaB 168/244 Met Moss PointD 134/198 Not Met GulfportN/A Excellence for All Pilot

30 2013 4 Year Graduation Rate, HSCI and HSV of Area High Schools Graduation Rate HSCIHSV D’Iberville HS93.4 206.8286 Bay HS87.7 250286 Pass Christian HS86.9 218.1310 Ocean Springs HS86.3 208.2307 Biloxi HS85.7 239.9296 Long Beach HS84.3 254298 East Central HS83.7 237293 St. Martin HS81.5 187.1274 George County High 80.6 193.5267 Hancock HS80.2 216294 Gautier HS79.3 202.4271 Vancleave HS76.4 204.9294 Pascagoula HS72.8 209.8247 Gulfport HS71.2 185.3269 Harrison Central HS66.7 180.2248 Moss Point HS63.7 154.5218

31 2013 Performance Data for Area High Schools QDI HSVGrowth Perf. Classification Pass Christian High223 310 No B Ocean Springs High221 307 Yes A Vancleave High217294 Yes A Hancock High214294 Yes A Long Beach High214298 No B East Central High209293 Yes A Biloxi High 210296 Yes A West Harrison High206 286 Yes A D’Iberville Senior High203286 No B Bay High School198286 No B St. Martin High192274 Yes B Gautier High 192271 Yes B George County High186267 No C Harrison Central 181248 No C Pascagoula High174247 Yes B Moss Point High154218 Yes C Gulfport HighN/A Excellence for All Pilot

32 2013 Performance Data of Area Middle Schools QDI Met Growth Perf. Label Pass Christian Middle209YesA Long Beach Middle 207YesA Biloxi Junior High206YesA Hancock Middle199YesB Ocean Springs Middle 199YesB D’Iberville Middle 191 NoC Bay Waveland Middle191YesB George County Middle School187YesB St. Martin Middle186YesB Vancleave Middle185YesB East Central Middle181YesB Gautier Middle School176YesB Colmer Middle171YesB Trent Lott 6 th Grade Academy157YesC Magnolia Jr. High (Moss Point) 133NoD Gulfport Central Middle N/A Bayou View MiddleN/A

33 2013 Performance Data for Area Elementary Schools QDIMet GrowthPerf. Label Delisle Elementary 227 YesA North Bay Elem. (Biloxi)223YesA Pass Christian Elem. 213YesA Beach Elem. 209YesA St. Martin East206* St. Martin North205* East Central Upper 196YesB Saucier Elementary193NoC OS Upper Elementary191YesB St. Martin Upper 190YesB Gorenflo Elem187YesB Woolmarket Elementary186YesB Vancleave Upper185YesB Gautier Elementary 166NoC Central Elem (Pascagoula)166YesB Lake Elem.160YesC Moss Point Upper131YesD Moss Point Lower135YesC Bayou View Elem. N/A Anniston Elementary N/A

34 Top 34 Highest Ranking Districts in MS (Ranked by QDI/HSV) Pass Christian 214/301 – ANew Albany195/277 - B Clinton208/295 – A Tishomingo Co. 193/278 - B Enterprise 206/297 – A Pearl River County192/270 - B Biloxi 206/292 – A Webster County191/281 – A Oxford202/288 – A Newton County191/273 - B Kosciusko202/284 – A Hancock County191/271 - B Amory 202/276 - A Monroe County190/274 - B Booneville201/291 – A Senatobia189/271 - B Petal201/284 – A Jackson County188/269 – B ($7995.00 per student/ ranked 131 of 152 in terms of Per Pupil Expenditure) Pontotoc City199/287 – A Tupelo188/262 - B Madison Co.199/285 – A Bay St. Louis186/274 - B DeSoto County199/284 – A Pearl186/266 - B Ocean Springs198/284 – A Grenada186/258 - B Long Beach198/282 – A Lowndes County185/265 - B Lamar County197/283 – A Harrison County185/262 - B Rankin County196/282 – A Union County184/272 - B Union City195/283 – APontotoc County184/270 - B

35 Note: In 2013, there are only 13 districts that met the following criteria: * District label as either A or B * Schools in these districts are either all A’s or a combination of A and B schools. (A district had to have at least one A school to be included in this group.) * All schools met growth. Jackson County is one of the thirteen that met the criteria to be included in this group. A list of these district is included on the next slide.

36 Biloxi Booneville Clinton JCSD Lamar County Lincoln County Monroe County New Albany Newton County Ocean Springs Oxford Pearl Tishomingo County

37 Changes in NCLB Requirements (effective 2012) The model changed in August 2012 due to the ESEA Flexibility Request. School Districts no longer receive a label. AYP is no longer measured. New Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs). Schools should cut in half the difference between current (2011) proficiency rates and 100 % proficiency in six years (2017) overall and for each subgroup in E/LA and Math.

38 Mississippi Federal Differentiated Accountability Model Priority (Lowest Performing 5% of Title I Schools) Focus (10 % of Title I schools with the biggest achievement gaps and/or lowest subgroup achievement. Approaching Target (Schools that miss AMO targets for a category for two years.) On Target Reward (High Performers and Big Improvers)

39 JCSD School Labels ~ 2013 ECLE – Approaching Target (based on ECUE) ECUE – Approaching Target SMNE – Approaching Target SMEE – Approaching Target SMUE – Approaching Target VLE – Approaching Target (based on VUE) VUE – Approaching Target

40 The JCSD Overall District Accountability Label is: B QDI is 188 HSV is 269 Met Growth Graduation Rate is 81.0 (4 year), 78.8 (5 year) In Summary:

Download ppt "Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard ” Accountability Data 2013 Raising the Standard."

Similar presentations

March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.

March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
1 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver.

1 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Waiver.
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.

What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.

Simpson County Schools Accountability Results, Fall of 2013 Franklin-Simpson High School 97 th Percentile* DISTINGUISHED *percentile rank based on 2012.
1 2011 Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE 2009-10 Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.

Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard” Accountability Data 2012.

Jackson County School District “Raising the Standard” Accountability Data 2012.
Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.

Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.
A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March 2012. Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://www.ncpublicschools.org/ready/resources/

A New School Accountability Model. Draft – March Check for Updates to this Presentationhttp://
New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.

New DC OSSE ESEA Accountability. DC OSSE ESEA Accountability Classification Overview I. DC OSSE Accountability System II. Classification of Schools III.
REVIEW OF 2014 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACHIEVEMENT DATA, GOAL SETTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR 2014/2015 SAUGUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.

REVIEW OF 2014 SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY AND ACHIEVEMENT DATA, GOAL SETTING, AND STRATEGIC PLANNING FOR 2014/2015 SAUGUS PUBLIC SCHOOLS CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability

Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for 2011-12:

A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data 2005-2008 September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.

Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.

School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.

HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.
2013-2014 Review 2014-2015 Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.

Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google