1. Overview of the RSACRP project Road Safety Audit and Crash Reduction Workshop Bandung, 27 & 28 May, 2011 Gerard Neilson VicRoads International Projects Team Leader, RSACRP Project (IndII #194)

2. RSACRP project  RSA - Road Safety Audits  CRP - Crash Reduction Programme 2

3. RSACRP project deliverables RSA - Road Safety Audit 16 EINRIP Projects CR - Crash Reduction CR reports for 30 sites on Jalan Pantura and Jalintim Sumatera CR engineering drawings and documents for implementation at 20 sites 3

4. 4

5. Road Infrastructure Safety Management (RISM) New SchemesExisting Roads Road Safety Impact Assess- ment Road Safety Audit Road Safety Inspection Black Spot Manage- ment Network Safety Manage- ment (RIA)(RSA)(RSI)(BSM)(NSM) Pro-active (prevention) Re-active (cure) 5

6. RISM for Indonesia New Schemes Existing Roads Road Safety Audit Road Safety Inspection Black Spot Management (RSA)(RSI)(BSM) Pro-active (prevention) Re-active (cure) 6 RSACrash Reduction

7. RSA Summary 16 RSA Reports  Lead auditors included Andria Fitra (1), Arief Rizaldi (1), Jany Agustin (3) and Victor Taufik (1)  6 reports being translated into Bahasa Indonesia  1 report was a desk-top study 7

8. How does RSA work? RSA is a process to ensure that, for road construction or re-construction projects, road user safety is not unduly comprised by the design. 8

9. 9

10. 10

11. 11

12. Why not make the RSA recommendations a permanent feature of future designs? Often, RSA recommendations lead to a re- evaluation of design standards. 12

13. And what if the road is already under construction? 13

14. Suggested implementation process for the current 16 EINRIP Projects 14 EINRIP PMU IndII EINRIP Supervising Consultant Subdit LKJ Auditor RSACRP Project

15. Implementation process - Stage 1 1.Auditor delivers reports to Subdit LKJ, who issues reports to the PMU 2.PMU and Subdit LKJ have “closure meeting”, attended by the SKJ and RSEU staff who completed the site inspection 15 EINRIP PMU Subdit LKJ Auditor RSACRP Project

16. Purpose of closure meeting NOT to discuss the merits of the RSA report recommendations; but to determine if there are circumstances or issues which may be relevant to or impact on the recommendations. 16

17. 3.If the closure meeting determines that there are issues which may be relevant to or impact on the audit report recommendations, the Subdit LKJ may issue a revised version of the report. 17

18. Implementation process - Stage 2 4.After consultation with IndII, the PMU informs IndII of its decision in respect to the audit report’s recommendations 5.The PMU directs the Supervising Consultant on how to proceed. 18 EINRIP PMU IndII EINRIP Supervising Consultant

19. RSACRP project - CR programme CR - Crash Reduction CR reports for 30 sites on Jalan Pantura and Jalintim Sumatera CR engineering drawings and documents for implementation at 20 sites 19

20. Nearly half of all road accidents in Europe occur on the two-lane rural road network.  these roads have lower geometric design than higher order roads;  they are not as well maintained;  head-on & run-off-road accidents are frequent,  and linked to: high speeds; dangerous overtaking; driver inattention; design constraints; sight restrictions; and roadside obstacles. 20

21. Blackspot definition A blackspot should be defined as any location which:  has a higher expected number of accidents, than at other similar locations,  as a result of local risk factors. RiPCORD-iSEREST project, European R & D project supported by the European Commission, 2005-2007. 21 is site sites

22. Blackspot - a definition for Indonesia A blackspot is defined as any site which:  has a higher number of accidents, than at other similar sites,  as a result of local risk factors. A site may be either a location (a curve, an intersection, etc.), or, a route (typically 1 km to 20 km long). 22

23. YearAccidentsKilledSeriouslySlight 199219 9209 81913 36314 846 199317 32310 03811 45313 037 199417 46911 00411 05512 215 199516 51010 9909 95211 873 199615 29110 8698 96810 374 199717 10112 3089 91312 699 199814 85811 6948 87810 609 1999*)12 6759 9177 3299 385 200012 6499 5367 1009 518 200112 7919 5226 6569 181 200212 2678 7626 0128 929 200313 3999 8566 1428 694 200417 73211 2048 98312 084 200591 62316 11535 89151 317 200687 02015 76233 28252 310 200749 55316 95520 18146 827 200859 1642018823 44055 731 23

24. 24

25. 25

26. Road casualties in France (1956-2005) 14 years, 83% increase 10 years20 years

27. Three (of several) key provisions which will improve road user safety Provide sealed shoulders Provide delineation of the road alignment at bends and sharp curves Marking hazards, particularly the end walls on narrow bridges 27

28. Use of the road space On developed networks: In rural areas, vehicles travel in the traffic lane together with some motorcycles which travel at a similar speed to the vehicles. There are no pedestrians; In urban areas, where there are pedestrians, they typically walk on footpaths which are separated from the traffic lanes by a kerb. 28

29. 29 pedestrians vehicles motor-cycles

30. cross-section 30

31. Shared use of the road space 31 vehicles and motorcycles motorcyclists and pedestrians pedestrians

32. 32 traffic lane Shoulders

33. 33 traffic lane 3.5 m shoulder 2 m Shoulder looks like another traffic lane. Shoulder is too wide and the outer edge line is not needed.

34. 34

35. Recommended carriageway widths On Pantura and Jalintim, from a road safety perspective, the ideal road cross-section widths on 2-lane 2-way sections in rural areas are:  traffic lanes: 3.5 m each  shoulder: 2.0 m total each side, of which 1.5 m is sealed and 0.5 m is gravel 35

36. Carriageway width departures carriageway element idealdeparture traffic lane3.53.0 shoulder2.01.5 36

37. Culvert lengths 37

38. Thank you! Gerard Neilson VicRoads International Projects Team Leader IndII RSACRP Project Jakarta, Indonesia 06 May, 2011. 38