1. HEKS Why reports are essential? Zürich, 11th of March 2015 Matthias Herren, Deskofficer CC

2. Church Cooperation Objectives of CC  In the frame of christian solidarity HEKS strengthens reformed churches in Eastern Europe and their institutions, enabling them in their ecclesiastic and diaconal mission.  Through partnerships HEKS fosters the exchange and strengthens the relations between parishes in Eastern Europe and Switzerland.  With the partner churches in Eastern Europe HEKS is leading a critical dialogue about beeing an open minded reformed church towards the society, other denominations and religions.

3. Church Cooperation HEKS Departments International Department Swiss Department Develop- ment work 16 countries Humani- tarian aid Church Coope- ration 5 countries Social inclusion Advocacy for socially disadvantaged

4. Church Cooperation Parnter churches of Church Cooperation Swiss Federation of Protestant Churches Reformed Church Hungary Reformed Church Romania (Transylvania) Reformed Church Transcarpatia (Ukraine) Evangelical Church of the Czech Brethren l Reformed Church Slowakia

5. KiZA-Konzept Current contents and action field of CC 1) Diakonia 2) Community development 3) Access to theological dialogue and formation

6. Church Cooperation 1) Diakonia  Inclusion of disadvantaged people (people with disabilities, Roma, old people, socially disadvantaged)  Institutional develop- ment of diaconal organisations  HRBA

7. KiZA-Konzept 2) Community development  Support of ecclesiastical activities and infrastructure  Establishing and accompaniment of partnerships between parishes  Interchurch dialogue in partnerships and groupe travels

8. Church Cooperation 3) Theological dialogue and formation  Wide dialogue amongst pastors and other church co-workers (formation)  Cooperation between theological instituts (study visits)

9. Church Cooperation Frame of CC Diakonia Community development Formation Partnership Projects

10. Reports Connection between donors and beneficiaries ?

11. Reports Connection between donors and beneficiaries  No direct connection between donors and beneficiaries  Donors are not selflessly

12. Reports Connection between donors and beneficiaries HQ/Coordinator trust, money knowhow, trust money comittment, framework, money

13. Reports Connection between donors and beneficiaries HQ/Coordinator impact, satisfaction impact, accountability impact, satisfaction

14. Reports Connection between donors and beneficiaries HQ/Coordinator trust, money knowhow, trust money comittment, framework, money impact, satisfaction impact, accountability impact, satisfaction

15. Reports Connection between donors and beneficiaries HQ/Coordinator trust, money knowhow, trust money comittment, framework, money impact, satisfaction impact, accountability impact, satisfaction Communication: visits, project proposal, agreement, Communication visits, reports

16. Reports Main donors: - Otto per Mille of the Valdensian Church in Italy - Congregations in Switzerland

17. Reports Structure: Narrative report 1.RESULTS: PROGRESS OF ACTIVITIES AND RESULTS 1.1. PROGRESS OF ACTIVITIES 1.2. RESULTS / OUTPUTS / OUTCOMES ACHIEVED 1.3. FINANCIAL STATUS 2. PROCESS / LEARNING 2.1. CHALLENGES AND PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD 2.2. MEASURES TO BE TAKEN TO ADAPT TO THESE CHALLENGES / TACKLE PROBLEMS 2.3. LESSONS LEARNT 2.4. PERSPECTIVES AND PLAN FOR THE COMING PROJECT PERIOD

18. Reports Logframe Ref No.Result description and indicators (copy from log frame or yearly plan) Planned target/ achievements for the reporting period Progress/AchievementsExplain deviation of plan OutcomeCommunity building - infrastructure We have created the place for community development, teaching and recreational activities. We can orginize events on our own. There is "home" for the project … Output 1.1 Output 1: The space is being rented The space is being rented… Activities 1.1.1 1.1.2... 1.1.1. A place is found 1.1.2. Long term agreement signed 1.1.3. Rent and overhead cost are at disposal on a long term sustainable basis Long term agreement is signed with the municipality that supports the project by letting us use the property for paying the common costs as long as we are using the poperty for this pupose. We can pay for it from the HEKS grant till the end of 2016. output 1.2. Output 2: The space is cleaned and furnished together with the Roma community The space is cleaned and furnished together with the Roma community The space is cleaned and furnished together with the Roma community. Activities: 1.2.1 1.2.2... 1.2.1. Roma families are invited 1.2.2. Painting and cleaning 1.2.3. Collecting furniture 1.2.4. Furnishing We decided to start to use the property before it is completely ready.so that we can create the space together with the beneficiaries. Some doors had to be bought and ventillation repaired. We made an initial cleaning together with the volunteers of Bethania CE. The children helped in cleaning and other tasks occasionally, it was not an organized program.We received a refrigirator and bookshelves free, bought some second-hand furniture and borrowed chairs and some of the equipment from the church. We bought new desks for the children and a screen. 1..2.4. First installment from HEKS came a bit later than we expected, so we had to pay salaries and other costs against the sum intented for eguipment If we receive the instalment, then we can go ahaed with purchasement. The decorating needs to be done

19. Reports Structure: Financial report

20. Reports