Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMaria Hood Modified over 10 years ago
1
Dataset of Services Commitments in RTAs Juan A. Marchetti & Martin Roy (WTO Secretariat) Workshop on PTAs and the WTO: A New Era Geneva, 4 November 2010
2
Purpose Assess liberalization commitments in recent PTAs, and compare them with achievements under GATS Based on Marchetti & Roy (2008), Services Liberalization in the WTO and in PTAs, in Marchetti & Roy (eds.) Opening Markets for Trade in Services – Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations (Cambridge University Press - WTO, 2008)
3
Assessing Commitments in Services PTAs: Methodology (1) Analysis of MA and NT commitments by 37 WTO Members (EU as 1) in 40 PTAs. Includes all those signed/entered into force since 2000, + others signed only. Focus on modes 1 and 3 Looking at what goes beyond GATS commitments/offers Starting point: Hoekman methodology... Score of 1 for full commitments Score of 0.5 for partial commitments Score of 0 for no commitment
4
Assessing Commitments in Services PTAs: Methodology (2)...But the scoring was further modified to take account of improvements from one agreement to the other. Example:
5
Dataset available on WTO Website 3 data files: Total score per member for all RTAs reviewed Highest RTA score for each member across all RTAs reviewed Highest RTA score for each member for selected service sectors http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/dataset_e/dataset_e.htm
7
Total Score for Each RTA Party
9
Highest RTA score for each Member across all RTAs reviewed
10
Overall Results (average for all Members reviewed)
11
Scores by Member (sample) Note: PTA score is for best PTA
12
Highest RTA score for each Member, per sector
13
Sectoral liberalization in PTAs
14
Thank you!
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.