1. Flexible Working Arrangements: Divergence and Convergence across Countries

2. Types of flexible working arrangements Working timeContractualExternalised Part-time work Weekend work Overtime Shift work Compressed working week Annualised hours Flexi-time Job sharing Temporary/casual work Fixed-term employment Home-based work Tele-working

3. There are several key findings: Continuous growth in flexible working arrangements National and regional differences in flexibility are still pronounced National differences often cut across popular understanding of flexible labour markets Traditional patterns of flexible working arrangements are still dominant over ‘new’ forms of flexibility

4. FWAs by Proportions Used Proportions of Companies by Regions of the World (%) English Speaking Northern European Central European Mediter- ranean Former Eastern Block Asian Shift Work Not Used 0 - 5% 6-10% 11-20% 21-50% >50% 29.3 18.0 10.0 09.2 14.3 19.3 37.0 14.4 08.5 08.9 15.8 15.4 32.2 15.3 09.6 08.3 14.4 20.1 24.2 14.0 10.0 09.3 13.0 29.4 24.9 12.8 09.3 09.0 20.2 23.8 47.0 07.8 05.9 07.8 10.0 21.5 Annual Hours Contract Not Used 0 - 5% 6-10% 11-20% 21-50% >50% 72.4 11.8 02.8 03.5 06.6 63.1 11.6 04.1 03.4 03.3 14.5 65.5 08.4 03.1 02.4 05.2 15.2 77.1 05.6 03.1 01.4 02.7 10.1 60.8 24.1 05.8 03.9 01.7 03.7 92.7 03.9 02.0 0 01.5 0 Flextime Not Used 0 - 5% 6-10% 11-20% 21-50% >50 45.9 20.6 09.5 06.4 06.6 10.9 21.7 15.8 11.0 12.5 27.9 26.7 09.4 06.9 08.2 11.8 36.9 66.5 12.7 04.1 04.0 04.3 08.3 45.3 23.5 10.5 07.8 06.6 06.3 81.5 10.2 02.0 02.4 01.0 02.9 Teleworking Not Used 0 - 5% 6-10% 11-20% 21-50% >50 73.0 19.9 03.8 01.6 01.1 00.6 58.0 32.2 05.1 02.0 01.9 00.8 69.7 23.8 02.8 01.6 01.0 01.2 90.1 06.6 01.4 00.8 00.4 00.7 75.6 18.2 03.3 01.3 00.8 91.4 05.3 01.4 0 01.4 00.5 National and regional differences in flexibility are still pronounced

5. National differences often cut across popular understanding of flexible labour markets In the debate over labour market flexibility, there has often been a notion that where state regulation is limited countries – for example, the USA or the United Kingdom – should score high across most flexibility measures. However, this is not the case since the prevalence of certain types of flexible working arrangements vary across countries. As Robinson (1999: 96) has pointed out regarding temporary work: countries with high levels of regulation of standard employment contracts often have high levels of flexible working arrangements. If firms find that certain types of flexible working arrangements are constrained by regulations then they will pursue other, more easily obtained forms of flexibility. Thus, France scores high in terms of annual hours contract, the Netherlands scores high in terms of part-time work and fixed-term contracts and Spain and Turkey are leaders in shift work. “So the relationship between regulation and the incidence of temporary employment is exactly the opposite way round from what might be expected. Indeed, a high and rising incidence of temporary employment could be taken as a worrying sign that regulation of standard employment contracts is seen as burdensome and may be distorting the labour market.” (Robinson 1999: 96).

6. CountriesNot used0-5%6-10%11-20%21-50%>50% UK79.916.02.61.00.40.2 Germany57.037.31.91.31.60.9 Sweden55.535.34.52.11.11.6 Denmark61.330.53.71.32.60.6 Netherlands59.429.26.61.92.40.5 Slovakia55.129.99.12.42.01.6 Norway39.747.65.53.73.20.5 Iceland52.430.513.31.91.0 USA45.236.910.33.22.02.4 Traditional patterns of flexible working arrangements are still dominant over ‘new’ forms of flexibility Proportion of workforce involved in tele-working (% of organsations)

7. In light of the futuristic discussion of the ‘end of the job’ (Bridges 1994), it has often been expected that annualised hours, job sharing, home-based working and tele-working would become major features of working life. However, this has yet to happen. For example, extensive use of tele-working (that is, more than 10% of a organisation’s workforce) covers less than 10% of the responding organisations. Even in countries that are the leaders in this area there is a long way to go before tele-working becomes part of mainstream flexible working arrangement (see Table on previous slide).

8. Bundles of Flexible Working Arrangements Non-Standard Work Patterns Non-Standard Work Hours Work OutsourcedWork Away from the Office Annual Contracts Part-time Work Job Sharing Flextime Fixed-term Contracts Compressed Work-week Weekend Work Shift Work Overtime Temporary Employment Subcontracting Home-based Work Tele-working

9. Flexible Work Arrangements By Category /Bundle Proportion of Companies by Country Regions (%) English Speaking Northern European Central European Mediter- ranean Former Eastern Block Asian Non-Standard Work Hours No FWAs 1 FWA_ 2 FWAs 3 FWAs 4 FWAs 5 FWAs 6 FWAs 01.8 09.3 20.0 26.0 22.4 14.8 05.7 00.2 04.7 14.3 32.2 28.4 15.4 04.8 00.6 04.0 18.1 32.2 25.1 15.4 04.7 10.5 28.3 28.6 19.4 09.1 02.5 01.4 05.3 17.6 30.4 28.1 13.3 03.7 01.5 17.3 39.3 25.0 11.2 04.6 02.0 00.5 Non-Standard Work Patterns No FWAs 1 FWA_ 2 FWAs 3 FWAs 04.6 13.7 27.4 54.3 06.2 21.1 28.0 44.7 07.8 18.7 31.3 42.2 05.7 14.5 31.4 48.4 06.8 15.8 28.8 48.6 20.4 34.5 27.2 18.0 Work Outsourced No FWAs 1 FWA_ 2 FWAs 08.4 54.9 36.7 07.1 56.2 36.7 31.5 39.0 29.5 24.1 34.9 41.0 16.7 51.4 31.8 24.6 30.8 44.6 Work Away From the Office No FWAs 1 FWA_ 2 FWAs 59.8 28.0 12.2 51.6 31.7 16.6 63.9 28.0 08.2 87.6 08.9 03.5 71.0 22.7 06.3 91.8 07.2 01.0

10. (a) non- standard work patterns have become embedded in most regions, though less so amongst Asian countries; (b) the two bundles of non-standard work hours and work away from the office are more common amongst countries in the English Speaking, Northern and Central European regions; (c) work outsourced is most common amongst Mediterranean and Asian countries; and (d) working away from the office has yet to take hold in Mediterranean and Asian countries.