1. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. Role of e-infrastructure in supporting European Research Kimmo Koski March 11 th, 2011 Oslo

2. Themes European Landscape in ICT support for research Nordic position Central or distributed support model How to prepare for 2015 and beyond

3. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. Landscape for supporting research in ICT Some trends

4. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. The Complex and Confusing European e-Infrastructure Landscape YOU NAME IT…

6. Synergy in services Benefits obtained case by case No need to solve all at the same shot, addressing a group of communities can be very valuable, too Picture: originally from EC, modified by Kimmo Koski

7. CASE CSC: EU projects’ portfolio (total volume in PMs) HPC Project area grid data bio medical linguistics applications network policy work

8. CASE CSC: EU projects’ portfolio (total volume in PMs) HPC Project area grid data bio medical linguistics applications network policy work environmental

9. From infrastructure to research driven projects Network: GN3 HPC: PRACE, DEISA, EGI data: EUDAT, ODE, APARSEN middleware: NDGF, EGI Application development: CRESTA Training, user interface: HPC-Europa2 Policy work: e-IRG, e-Infran et Community: Elixir, Claricle, ENVRI, BioMedSci Ice2sea MMM@ HPC Science specific problem General e-Infrastructures Emphasis to build trust TOP PRIORITY ACTION: Moving from horizontal projects to support vertical activities and research driven projects, but maintaining the presence and role in the relevant e- Infrastructure layers

10. Critical times for European e-infrastructure Will PRACE funding be sustainable after the first round (business model)? Will financial national contribution in EGI allow self sustained organization in a long run? Will there be EU-project flagships for emerging areas, such as data, software development, education and training, green ICT and cloud services? Can we build trust between researchers and service providers such as national centers? How can we efficiently collaborate in providing e- infrastructure and related services in Europe?

11. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. Nordic position

12. Different support systems in different countries Finland centralized, critical mass Sweden and Norway distributed, local matching funding Denmark coordinates through research groups, direct researcher involvement in e-infrastructure decisions Common nominators: NDGF, joint work in EGI and e-IRG, commonalities in ESFRI-participation, 3/5 included in PRACE etc. Need to respect national decisions and note that history has an impact to the system –Joint services with distributed resourcing possible –Requirement to fit together with the national system

13. Nordic opportunities Green ICT and datacenters, cloud computing Excellent education system Resource profiling – do we all want to repeat the same services? Collaboration in Research Infrastructures (both ESFRI and existing RIs)

14. Role in HPC Worth thinking about: –How many Nordic projects have got resources from PRACE? –How many even applied? What is the reason? –No need? –Too good local resourcing? –Software does not scale? –Something else? Can we risk not getting the high-end resources timely due to time consuming peer review and uncertainties to succeed Major training and scalable software development challenge -> should be done together

15. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. Datacenter example

16. Finnish competitive edge – as a country (Fits to Norway or Nordic, too…)  Modern and reliable infrastructure (national power grid, roads, airline connections, data networks)  World class education system and competences on ICT & energy  Steady economical and political conditions  Cheap energy (www.energy.eu) and strongly increasing CO 2 –free capacitywww.energy.eu  Cool climate and water resources  No major earthquakes (4.1 biggest ever)  No major storms or other dangerous natural phenomena  European Gateway to Russia Kajaani paper mills & hydro & bio energy

19. 19

20. CASE Finland: next generation supercomputing Major investments –25 MEUR funding granted for investment in HPC, medium range and data management –30 MEUR investment in Datacenter (Kajaani) –Operation costs on top of that (in CSC budget) Installations in phases during 2012-2014 Procurement started, decisions expected autumn 2011

21. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. Central vs. Distributed

22. Characteristic for Finnish model  Services centralized in the national center (CSC) Productivity Quality Cost efficiency  Strong support organization Technical and scientific support Multidisciplinary Diverse fields (computing, connections, contents)  Short way to decision making Limited Company (Ltd.) Short path to the Ministry of Education  Functional distribution of work Cooperation between CSC and institutions of higher learning

23. It is not that simple… Both central and distributed models have their strengths and challenges –Matching funding, areal support, distance to customers, overhead in repeating services, competence development in universities etc. History has an impact Ability to agree how to divide work is a key issue

24. Distributed model Overhead in providing services, but impact in involving local users and training local people Slower decisions, but high commitment after that Overlaps in investments, but possibility to add local co-funding Requires typically lot of committees and strategy papers, but that can also be useful sometimes.

25. Infrastructure is evolving: can we afford to renew all every four years? Cray XT 2008

26. Users adapt quickly: Example from CSC supercomputer history

27. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. How to prepare for future, 2015 and beyond

28. Some proposals Focus on balanced services, e-infrastructure at large, including training and education Invest in more efficient management and utilization of data Find successful ways to build trust in ICT between research and service providers –What to do: research –How to implement it: service provider Explore work distribution in Nordic level –Selected projects, well-defined targets, clear benefits More efficient utilization of European resources –Active Nordic participation –Joint presence

29. CSC – Tieteen tietotekniikan keskus Oy CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. Spring is almost here! You can already see deer walking in the fields…