Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byOswald Hopkins Modified over 9 years ago
1
Material calculation of petal core variants Sergio Díez Cornell with input from many people CERN AUW, 3 rd Nov 2014
2
Petal core material This is an updated calculation of the total petal core material based on the current petal model Bus tapes, locking points, E breaks included NOT included: silicon, SE4445, hybrids, ASICs, WBs, EoP, etc. Disclaimer: Most of the values come from volumetric estimations provided by the CAD software. No mass measurements were made (we don’t have petals yet) Due to this, adhesive estimations are the ones with biggest uncertainties Assumed 100% coverage and constant glue thicknesses in all glue interfaces The most obvious error is on honeycomb-facings glue: honeycomb structure is simplified as a full block with very low density; this is ok for the honeycomb estimation, but most likely overestimates greatly the amount of glue A more accurate calculation should be expected once petal cores are produced (and weighed) Expect also some minor “systematic uncertainties” on X0s (check backup slides) i.e., used X0 of Korex for N636 HC The “baseline” is just the default version I have considered for this study 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 2
3
Current petal core model 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 3 Locking points are PEEK This pipe section and connectors are not included (top bus tape and facing not shown here) Lateral C-channels are CF Top and bottom closeouts are PEEK
4
Baseline petal core X0 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 4 ItemMaterial Total mass (g) Density (g/cm3) Volume (cm3) Normalized thickness X0/ρ (cm)%X0 Facings K13C2U/EX1515 (45 gsm, 43% RC) 56.7591.617.7370.0450729.240.154% Bus tapes Cu/Polyiamide/adhesive 51.373 various16.92 0.04300 various0.227% C-Channels K13C2U/EX1515 (45 gsm, 43% RC) 8.5141.6 5.3210.00676 29.240.022% Closeouts + Locking points PEEK 16.643 1.32 11.1220.01602 31.9 0.050% Allcomp K9 Allcomp (0.23g/cc) 15.9990.2334.7800.08837185.60.048% Honeycomb YSH50A-75 +EX-1515 (1/4) 27.7090.048577.2810.7333810060.073% Adhesives Hysol9396/BN (30%) 18.979 1.49 12.7140.01602 25.4 0.064% Pipe + E breaks Ti /Al2O3 7.216 4.54/3.97 1.4390.00205 3.58/7.04 0.054% TOTAL:203.192 g0.692% Spreadsheet with detailed calculations: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/pub/Atlas/StripsUpgradeLocalSupport/Diez_petalcore_material_31_10_2014_v2.xlsx
5
Bus tape variants Different bus tapes considered: “Baseline”: bus tape covers full area “C” is part of the bus tape: 3 Kapton layers (25+50+12.5 µm) 3 adhesive layers (25 µm each) “A” and “B” are part of the bus tape (barrel approach) Parylene isolation: bus tape only covers “A” and “B” “C” is a thin (40 µm) parylene layer, no HV power traces 20 µm should be enough for HV isolation, but surface may not be perfectly flat (difference between 20 and 40 µm is 0.013 %X0) “B” is a bridge on top of the R5 sensors 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 5 “A”: sides “B”: bridge “C”: HV contact and isolation
6
Material calcualtion for bus tapes 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 6 ItemNumberMaterialTotal Mass(g)Density(g/cm3)Volume (cm3)Total thick (cm)X0 (cm)%X0 TOPKAPTON (kapton cover layer), 12.5um 2Polyiamide4.1741.421.4700.0037328.60.01306% Adhesive, 25 um 2Adhesive6.7011.142.9390.00747350.02134% BOTTOM (Cu shield layer), 12 um 2Cu5.38580.3370.000861.430.05980% INNERKAPTON (adhesiveless Kapton), 25 um 2Polyiamide8.3471.422.9390.0074728.60.02611% Adhesive, 25 um 2Adhesive6.7011.142.9390.00747350.02134% TOP (Cu traces), 18 um 2Cu2.81380.1760.000451.430.03124% Adhesive, 25 um 2Adhesive0.5571.140.2440.00062350.00177% BOTTOMKAPTON (Kapton) 50 um 2Polyiamide16.6951.425.8780.0149428.60.05222% 51.3730.043000.22687% ItemNumberMaterialTotal Mass(g)Density(g/cm3)Volume (cm3)Total thick (cm)X0 (cm)%X0 TOPKAPTON (kapton cover layer), 12.5um 2Polyiamide1.3311.420.4690.0011928.60.00416% Adhesive, 25 um 2Adhesive2.1381.140.9380.00238350.00681% BOTTOM (Cu shield layer), 12 um 2Cu5.38580.3370.000861.430.05980% INNERKAPTON (adhesiveless Kapton), 25 um 2Polyiamide2.6871.420.9460.0024028.60.00841% Adhesive, 25 um 2Adhesive2.1571.140.9460.00240350.00687% TOP (Cu traces), 18 um 2Cu2.81380.1760.000451.430.03124% Adhesive, 25 um 2Adhesive0.5571.140.2440.00062350.00177% BOTTOMKAPTON (Kapton) 50 um 2Polyiamide5.3741.421.8920.0048128.60.01681% HV insulation (Parylene) 40 um 2Parylene7.0151.13.188840.0081039.40.02056% 29.4580.023210.15643% “Baseline”: Bus tape covering full area “Parylene”: Bus tape on the sides, parylene on the center
7
X0 of petal variants 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 7 Petal variants Item“Baseline” Parylene isolation PEEK closeouts N636 HC“light core” Facings0.154% Bus tapes0.227%0.156%0.227% 0.156% Closeouts + Locking points0.073% 0.072%0.073%0.072% Allcomp0.048% Honeycomb0.073% 0.056% Adhesives0.064% Pipe + E breaks0.054% TOTAL0.6923%0.6219%0.6909%0.6758%0.604%
8
Material comparison (I) 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 8 “Baseline” 0.6923 %X0 Total mass: 203.192 g Parylene isolation 0.6219 %X0 Total mass: 181.277 g
9
Material comparison (II) 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 9 “Baseline” 0.6923 %X0 Total mass: 203.192 g N636 honeycomb 0.67585 %X0 Total mass: 193.96 g
10
Material comparison (III) 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 10 “Baseline” 0.6923 %X0 Total mass: 203.192 g All PEEK closeouts 0.6909 %X0 Total mass: 202.089 g
11
Material comparison (IV) 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 11 “Baseline” 0.6923 %X0 Total mass: 203.192 g “Light core”: Parylene, N636, all PEEK closeouts 0.6040 %X0 Total mass: 170.94 g
12
What does it really mean? The %X0 of the barrel modules+adhesive between Si and core (not including power components) is equal to 1.20 %X0 One should expect a similar number for the petal modules Detailed calculation will come first design of all hybrid flavors is available Using the barrel estimate for the modules: 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 12 Core optionCore (%X0)Core + electronics (%X0)Core contribution Percentage of material saving wrt baseline Baseline0.692%1.892%36.59%0.00% Parylene + bus tape0.622%1.822%34.13%3.72% All PEEK closeouts0.691%1.891%36.54%0.08% N636 honeycomb0.676%1.876%36.03%0.87% "Light core" option0.604%1.804%33.48%4.67%
13
In summary Material saving is one of the main arguments in favor of parylene coating (the other one is thermal performance) Parylene gives you around 3.5% less material (although probably less) However, this may lead to other challenges as opposed to using a well known option from the barrel effort How do you connect your HV? A bridge (+WBs, connectors?) that goes on top of the R5 sensors is still needed, or a bus tape folding on the top region (L&F-like) How flat and uniform is your coating going to be? My opinion: material savings are not big enough to justify the extra effort, but of course others may disagree... →A comparison of the thermal performance needs to be performed as well (maybe this has been done already?) 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 13
14
Other savings N636 honeycomb instead of CF gives you < 1% material saving But material is not the main argument here! Although it goes in your favor also Going for PEEK closeouts does not give you any material savings However it may help to simplify build (and G&S) procedure 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 14
15
Backup 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 15
16
Comments about X0 numbers MaterialX0/rho (cm)Comments Facings and C-channles K13C2U/EX1515 (45 gsm, 43% RC) 29.24X0 scaled from K13D2U/RS3 facings, 80 gsm, using differences in density CF honeycomb YSH50A-75 +EX-1515 (1/4) 1006 X0 scaled from YSH50/RS3 HC using differences in density (provided by manufacturer) Allcomp foam K9 (0.23g/cc) 185.6X0 scaled from Allcomp 0.3 g/cc, new 0.23 g/cc provided by manufacturer PEEK31.9X0 from SCT calc Ti3.58X0 from PDG Hysol9396/BN (30%)25.4 Assumes full block of HC with very low density, X0 from barrel calculations, assumes 100% glue coverage and a fixed thickness Bus tape adhesive layers 35X0 from barrel, coming from pixel calculations Polyamide 28.6 X0 from PDG Parylene39.4X0 from LHCB calc N636 honeycomb N636 PK2-3/16-2.0 1300Used X0 of Korex 3 Nov 2014Petal core material, AUW Nov 2014 16
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.