Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Teleological Argument Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Teleological Argument Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang."— Presentation transcript:

1 Teleological Argument Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang

2 Lecture Outline 1. Teleological argument A. Background B. Paley’s argument 2. Objections A. Hume’s objection B. Darwin’s theory 3. The contemporary debate: three questions

3 Teleological Argument Background What a teleological argument is Major features Definition of telos (τέλος) Proponents William Paley (1743-1805) William Paley 1743-1805

4 Teleological Argument Paley’s argument Stone vs. watch Reason for the different responses o Many parts working together for a purpose o Indispensable parts

5 Teleological Argument Paley’s argument Objects in nature o Purposefulness o Example – the eye Example – the eye

6 Teleological Argument “ Take the human eye, for example. It is made of parts that work together in intricate, complicated ways. The eye has an opening through which light enters, and there is a mechanism that automatically makes the opening larger or smaller depending on the amount of light available. The light then passes through a lens that focuses it on a sensitive surface, which in turn translates the patterns into signals that can be transmitted to the brain through the optic nerve. If any detail is changed, the whole thing stops working. Imagine that there was no hole in the front of the eyeball, or no lens, or no nerve connecting it to the brain – then everything else would be pointless.” -James Rachels on the human eye

7 Teleological Argument “Every manifestation of design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference, on the side of nature, of being greater or more, and that in a degree which exceeds all computation.”

8 Teleological Argument -Many parts working together for purpose -Indispensable parts “Like effects have like causes” -Many parts working together for purpose -Indispensable parts

9 Teleological Argument Paley’s argument (P1) We rightfully conclude that objects such as watches are made by intelligent designers because they have parts that work together to serve a purpose. (P2) We have the same evidence that the parts of nature were made by an intelligent designer: the plants, animals, organs, etc. of the natural world are also composed of parts that work together to serve a purpose. Therefore, (C) We are entitled to conclude that the natural world was made by an intelligent designer.

10 Objections

11 Hume’s Objection Background David Hume (1711-1776) o Biography o Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779) David Hume (1711-1776)

12 Hume’s Objection EFFECT CAUSE

13 Hume’s Objection How do I know that my headache this morning was caused by drinking? Development of belief – Alcohol can cause headaches Continuous observation

14 Hume’s Objection How do I know that my headache was caused by drinking? Me this morning Background belief – alcohol can cause headaches The point: Deriving a cause from an effect requires background knowledge

15 Hume’s Objection How do we know the watch was created by a watchmaker? Background belief – watchmakers make watches

16 Hume’s Objection EFFECT CAUSE No background knowledge of how universes are created ?

17 Hume’s Objection “And will any man tell me with a serious [face], that an orderly universe must arise from some [Intelligence] because we have experience of it? To ascertain this reasoning, it were requisite that we had experience of the origin of worlds…”

18 Despite Hume’s objections, the question still arises… How do we get such biological complexity and purposefulness in the natural world?

19 Darwin’s Theory of Evolution Background Charles Darwin (1809-1882) o Biography Label “evolution” misleading Charles Darwin (1809-1882)

20 Three important ideas in Darwin’s theory

21 Darwin’s Theory Heritability of traits Each individual inherits characteristics of its parents An organisms decedents tend to resemble it

22 Darwin’s Theory Variation There are variations between members of species These variations are due to genetic mutation Variations among finches

23 Darwin’s Theory Due to mutation, offspring have thicker beaks and darker feathers

24 Darwin’s Theory Natural selection Those that possess the traits conducive to survival in a particular environment survive and reproduce Those that do not possess these traits die off

25 Darwin’s Theory Environment in which primary food source is nuts Imagine this process occurring for millions upon millions of years

26 Darwin’s Theory Imagine this process occurring for millions upon millions of years It makes sense that the finches today have the “perfectly designed” attributes to survive What appears to be “intelligent design” can be explained by millions of years of natural selection

27 The contemporary debate: Three questions

28 The contemporary debate Can God and evolution co- exist? ABSOLUTELY

29 The contemporary debate Can Darwin’s theory explain all biological systems? “irreducible complexity” Michael Behe’s Darwin’s Black Box (1996)

30 The contemporary debate What content should be included in a high school science class? VSVS


Download ppt "Teleological Argument Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google