Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byRudolf Francis Modified over 9 years ago
1
Simulating the Response of Two Wyoming Glaciers to Projected 21 rst Century Warming Mitchell A. Plummer, Idaho National Laboratory L. DeWayne Cecil U.S.Geological Survey
3
Teton Range Wind River Range
4
Net annual ice balance, b n b n = net ice budget at any location in the x,y plane Snow = total snowfall –Fraction of precipitation falling as snow M = mass of snow melted –Calculated from energy balance when T > 0 E = evaporation & sublimation –Calculated via turbulent heat transfer equations
6
T = -6ºC
8
Modeled Glaciers and Perennial SnowMapped Glaciers and Perennial Snow
9
Grand Teton Cascade Canyon Jenny Lake Mount Saint John Photo by Ed Williams, BYU Idaho
11
Base case +1.0 °C +0.5 °C
15
Base case
16
+0.5ºC
17
+1.0ºC
18
+1.5ºC
19
+2.0ºC
20
+2.5ºC
22
Upper Fremont Glacier Lower Fremont Glacier Knifepoint Glacier Titcomb basin
24
August 1990 firn line, 3980 m Naftz et al. 2002
29
Max ice thickness (m) 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Total ice volume (m 3 ) 1. Modern glacier too large 2. Modern glacier just right (+0.25ºC) 3. Five 0.25ºC temperature increases applied Glacier allowed to return to steady state {
30
Conclusions Modeling experiments suggest that a temperature increase of ~1.5°C would effectively eliminate the Teton and Lower Fremont glaciers –Apparent sensitivity of Fremont glacier appears inconsistent with the USGS 18 O temperature record but lapse rate variations not yet explored At late 20 th century global warming rates (~0.1°C / decade), it could take as long as 150 – 200 years to dramatically increase the biodiversity of these locations Global climate models scaled to the Pacific NW project an increase in average temperature on the order of 0.2°-0.6°C (0.3°-1°F) per decade throughout the 21st century, so maybe we can get to that species richness in 50 – 100 yrs. Response times matter. Two retreating glaciers of different size may well be responding to completely different phenomena. Uncertainties? Yes, but …
31
Questions Barring ‘local’ redistribution of snow by wind, avalanching etc, how variable is precipitation across short distances in the mountains and how would one capture that in a simple model? In paleoglacier modeling, –How is a large change in mountain precipitation distributed vertically? –How reasonable is it to assume constant lapse rates? Are pseudo-vertical lapse rates related to vertical precipitation gradients? Need more data to describe mountain climate and its variability
32
Photo by Ed Williams, BYU Idaho Terminus
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.