2. Agenda Group Developments Timeline Problem Statement Background Costumer Scope Deliverables Brainstorming Research & Generate Ideas Criteria Constraints Explore Possibilities Selecting an Approach Design Proposal Prototype Test & Monitor Refine Lessons Learned Summary Bibliography

3. Group Development Roles and Responsibilities: Kartikey Leader Courtney Sarah Scribes Jon Ko Time Keeper

4. Group Development (cont’d) Team Constitution Respectful to ideas and everyone Must do work Help in building process Stay on task and focus Stay positive Effective Group

5. Timeline Kept us on task

6. Problem Statement

7. Background Roadrunner Trucking → a lot of aluminum cans Aluminum cans must be reduced by 70% $0.05 fine per can

8. Customers Mr. Pritchard -ITC instructor Roadrunner Trucking -company we give product to

9. Scope Outputs Can Crusher Tech Report Power Point Resources Internet Mr. Pritchard- Tech Miss Hernacki- Math Calculations Mr. Hund- CAD Drawings

10. Scope Potential Materials Wood PVC Metal brackets Metal hinges Nails and screws

11. Scope Key Constraints Max space of 18”×24”×30” One simple machine One unit Manually operated Bin must hold 20 uncrushed cans

12. Deliverables Can Crusher Tech Report Power Point presentation

13. Brainstorming Materials Size Type of can crusher

14. Research and Generate Ideas Materials  Wood, metal hinges, screws and nails Size of wood  ½”-2” thick Type of can crusher  Self-loading with lever

15. Criteria Self-loading Inexpensive Simple Not time consuming Reliable

16. Constraints Max of 18” x 24” x 30” Materials: wood, PVC, metal brackets, metal hinges, screw & nails One simple machine Crushed can falls into aluminum can bin Bin slides in and out of crusher Bin holds 20 uncrushed cans

17. Explore Possibilities – Designs 1. Kartikey’s Design Pros(+)Cons(-) SimpleUsed incline plain wrong Dimensioned wellNo thickness Self-loading Requires a lot of input force

18. Explore Possibilities – Designs 2. Courtney’s Design Pros(+)Cons(-) Multi-view and isometric drawingsnot dimensioned well Follows all size constraintsNo bin Very neatLever too complicated and would not work

19. Explore Possibilities - Designs 3. Sarah’s Design Pros(+)Cons(-) Aluminum can bin is really tall (all space will be taken up Bin may tip over when crushing a can Follows all constraintscomplex Very neatNot self-loading Uses a lot of material

20. Explore Possibilities - Designs 4. Jon Ko’s Design Pros(+)Cons(-) DetailedConfusing Good dimensionsMaterials used are expensive Followed most constraintsAluminum can bin does not slide in and out

21. Select an Approach Design Criteria Potential Designs Kartikey’s Design Courtney’s Design Sarah’s Design Jon Ko’s Design Self-loading5113 Inexpensive4333 Reliable4135 Quick to build 4333 Simple5333 Ease of use3234 Total25131621

22. Select an Approach Materials Criteria Potential Materials Aluminum brackets Metal brackets Steel brackets Iron brackets Titanium brackets Inexpensive3422 1 Availability in the store4531 1 Ease of use2543 3 Strength3443 5 Reliability3542 5 Total 152317 1115

23. Select an Approach Adhesives Criteria Potential Adhesives Wood GlueHot GlueSuper Glue Screws & nails Duct Tape Dries quickly45455 Inexpensive44353 Sticks to our material 42453 Ease of appliance31332 Cleanliness41341 Reliability42453 Total23152127 17

24. Develop a Design Proposal Detailed CAD Drawings

25. Develop a Design Proposal Bill of Materials

26. Develop a Design Proposal Build Process

27. Develop a Design Proposal Test Plan Test CriteriaHow Tested Expected results Actual Results Reliability Durability Bin Must Hold 20 Cans Self- Loading Can Must End-up In Bin After Being Crushed

28. Prototype

29. Test and Monitor

30. Refine

31. Lessons Learned

32. Summary

33. Bibliography