1. Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas Read, NDTAC

2. Participants will better understand: The important differences between Subparts 1 and 2 The differences between generating and allocating Part D funds The necessity of utilizing needs assessments and formal agreements Their roles as training and technical assistance (TA) providers, collaborators, and relationship builders 2 Objectives

3. Subpart 1 is quite straightforward. –State Plan –“Supplement not supplant” –Transition reservation Subpart 2 is far more open. –Different/more complicated counting process –No “supplement not supplant” clause –Part A reservation 3 Subpart 1 vs. Subpart 2

4. Different eligibility requirements Different reporting requirements and timeframes – Annual Child Count – Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) The youth themselves are different. 4 Generating vs. Administering Funds

5. Generating Funds Getting Part D Dollars

6. To ensure your State’s full share of Part D (and Part A, neglect) funds –The pie has been baked, but they haven’t cut your slice yet. To increase your knowledge of populations and their needs –Take note of large/unusual increases or decreases. –Track where (locality) numbers are increasing/decreasing. –Note changes in program (neglected, delinquent, or at-risk) populations. To pass Federal audit 6 Why Get the Count Right?

7. Translator Data reviewer and verifier Fund recipient Contractor Innovator 7 Your Roles in the Generating Process

8. Use/adapt the Federal survey. Ensure agency, facility, and student eligibility. –Note important differences between S1 and S2. –Work through the “gray areas.” Get complete and accurate counts. –Combat the reluctance of agencies/facilities. –Provide ongoing training and TA. –Institute verification processes. 8 Annual Child Count

9. Administering Funds Allocating and Managing Part D Dollars

10. To be more effective –Foster better outcomes for youth. –Meet Federal, State, and local requirements. –Meet program, agency, and facility goals and mandates. –Ensure future Federal program funding. To be more efficient –Do more with less in times of financial struggle. –Effectively administer Part D along with other responsibilities. 10 Why Plan Your Funding?

11. Manager/coach Training and TA provider Monitor Data collector and analyzer Program improvement leader 11 Your Roles in the Funding Process

12. 1.State Plans 2.Application development a.Needs sensing b.Formal agreements 3.Application review a.“Use of funds” proposals 4.Fund allocation and TA 12 Fund Allocation Steps

13. Read your State Plan! It is… –The foundation of your Part D program –An agreement with the USED Know when to change it, when these occur: –New understandings of Part D –Changes in populations and/or needs –Reauthorization 13 Step 1: Know Your State Plan

14. The Part D application is like an RFP; the application: Provides the chance to shape State and local programs through: –Meeting Federal requirements –Providing additional guidelines and/or regulations –Setting funding/serving priorities Offers the opportunity to provide more guidance now for fewer difficulties later, through: –Asking for more in program narratives and budgets 14 Step 2: Use the Application as a Tool

15. Needs sensing and/or assessments: Can be conducted at the State, agency, and facility/program levels Can focus on a single interest area or a whole system or program Can be completed by: 1.Defining the purpose and scope 2.Establishing a planning team 3.Developing an agency/facility/program profile 4.Identifying desired data, availability, usability, and collection methods 5.Analyzing data, identifying needs, and setting priorities 15 Step 2a: Focus Applications on Needs

16. Educational offerings within facilities and programs Additional available services and supports Students’ demographics and their unique needs Academic and vocational outcomes Transitional/post-release outcomes Professional development offerings and needs Relationships and their quality Where we are now. Where we need/want to be. How we can get there. 16 What a Needs Assessment Tells You

17. A formal agreement is: A contract between funder and provider. –Keeps expectations clear and creates lines of accountability for services Required for local education agencies (LEAs) and facilities—a good idea for State agencies (SAs) and facilities. As the SEA, consider including more specificity in the application. 17 Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements

18. Formal agreements inform funders… How the grantee will use funds—meeting all requirements and student/staff needs What students will be served What staff (if any) will be funded and their qualifications What materials and equipment will be used and their costs Any potential for blended/braided funding What types and frequency of data will be collected How data will be used for program improvement 18 Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements

19. Formal agreements inform recipients… Purpose of the funds Application requirements Award amount Period of agreement and re-applying timelines Use of fund requirements and restrictions Data collection and reporting requirements Monitoring expectations Consequences for not complying with agreement 19 Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements

20. Did I receive what I asked for? –Initially prescriptive vs. open and optimistic Does what I received make sense? –At the facility, agency, and State levels –How does one program affect the others? Is the application focused on improvement? –Does it take into account past outcomes? –Does it address current needs? 20 Step 3: Conduct Thorough Application Reviews

21. Decide on allowable and appropriate uses. –Use detailed decision rules. –Start with musts, work through to shoulds. Remember Federal, State, and agency/program priorities and goals. Be strategic. Feel comfortable with the process and confident in your decisions. 21 Step 3a: Evaluate “Use of Funds” Proposals

22. Funding can be formulaic or competitive/discretionary. –Generating does not have to mean receiving. –Hybrid funding models can be used. The SEA, SAs, and LEAs are more than just “pass throughs.” These agencies: –Facilitate coordination and build relationships. –Maintain ongoing knowledge of programs. –Make course corrections along the way. –Provide ongoing TA to foster better monitoring outcomes. 22 Step 4: Allocations and Technical Assistance

23. Mini Sessions Implementing Institutionwide Projects, Anju Sidana and Greta Colombi Facility Accreditation, Dorothy Wodraska Coordination and Collaboration, John McLaughlin Breakout Sessions Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes, Stephanie Lampron and DeAngela Milligan Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions, Nicholas Read, Simon Gonsoulin and Jeff Breshears Neglected or Delinquent Community Session 23 Today’s Planning and Funding Sessions