Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBritney Randall Modified over 9 years ago
1
Harnessing Technology for Service Delivery: Best Practices in Academic Libraries Jennifer Joseph, Sharon Premchand-Mohammed and Stella Sandy St. Augustine Campus Libraries Implementing a New ILS
2
Overview The paper seeks to describe the implementation of a new integrated library system (ILS) at the Libraries of the three Campuses of The University of the West Indies. It traces the process from the initial planning and procurement stages, to the installation, “switch to production”, and transition to maintenance phases. It critically examines the process, and analyzes the strategies used to achieve the various defined objectives. Sharing the experience gained from the challenges faced and the problem surmounted, this case study is useful for small academic libraries in a developing world context, which face a variety of challenges when implementing new technologies critical to their relevance and survival.
3
Harnessing Technology for Service Delivery: Best Practices in Academic Libraries Mission Strategic vision for UWI Libraries New era in information service delivery Project Chronology Implementation Challenges Strategic Decisions Lessons Learnt Recommendations for Best Practices Future Research
4
UWI Mission The enduring mission of The University of the West Indies is to propel the economic, social, political and cultural development of West Indian society through teaching, research, innovation, advisory and community services and intellectual leadership.
5
UWI Libraries Mission To support the teaching, learning and research functions of The University of the West Indies To be the premier repository of unique Caribbean materials
6
Strategic Vision for UWI Libraries To implement a new integrated library system (ILS) for all three campuses To improve information service delivery across the three campuses To improve access across the three campuses To foster the concept of ‘one university’
7
New Era in Information Service Delivery Old system – VTLS: –limited capabilities e.g. unable to interface with external systems such as Banner and PeopleSoft –Inability to generate meaningful statistical data e.g. student usage patterns -- version no longer supported by the vendor
8
New Era in Information Service Delivery continued New to accommodate the requirements of institutions of all types system – ALEPH 500: –Can be tailored to accommodate the requirements of institutions of all types and sizes –Easy to use with user-friendly workflows and intuitive graphical interfaces to increase staff and patron efficiency –Scalable system that enables libraries to add modules as required to suit their environment –Open technology that is based on industry standards –Fully integrated ILS which gives access to all its functions from a single interface
9
Project Chronology 2001University Grants Committee approval 2001–2002Needs assessment on three campuses (driven by Library Systems staff) 2003Preparation of Request for Proposal (RFP) Feb. 2004RFP issued to vendors Mar. 2004BID proposals received from vendors Apr. 2004Evaluation process began Sep./Oct. 2004Short-listed vendors gave demonstrations on each campus Feb. 2005Evaluation process completed – Ex Libris recommended Apr. 2005Ex Libris selected Apr. 2005Negotiations with Ex Libris began Nov. 2005Contract signed with Ex Libris Dec. 2005Project Kick-Off teleconference
10
Project Chronology continued Feb. 2006STA Servers received Mar./Oct. 2006ALEPH 500 training begins Mar./Dec. 2006Data conversion begins May 2006Operations Analysis conducted Jun. 2006ELUNA 2006 Jun. 2006Contract modification – replace the implementation of ALEPH Reporting Centre (ARC) with the implementation of SFX and Metalib Sep. 2006Earthquake hits Trinidad and Tobago – Main Library severely damaged Oct./Nov. 2006Rollout of Staff training Dec. 2006Production Load Jan. 2007Switch to Production Mar. 2007Switch to Support Overall Project – 6 years Implementation – 13 months
11
Implementation Challenges Vendor’s lack of knowledge of UWI environment – first implementation by the vendor in the Caribbean Finalisation of technical environment took too long (4 months for STA) - impacted on project timeline Lack of time in the project schedule for vendor to analyse and understand UWI existing workflows
12
Implementation Challenges continued Too many documents used to analyse UWI environment which were not customized to UWI’s requirements Training delivery by vendor; –method and timing –too much content in too short a time –Lack of time in the project schedule for training –Inappropriate scheduling of training sessions
13
Implementation Challenges continued Functional teams leadership Cultural issues Lack of buy-in by some members of staff which started way back in the evaluation process Lack of time for testing before STP (switch to production) Natural disasters – earthquake, flooding Network and electrical problems Complex documentation STA and CAV are different libraries but were seen by the vendor as very similar
14
Strategic Best Practices Extended project plan – 9 months to 12 months ELUNA (Ex Libris Users of North America) conference attendance –attendance at 2006 conference during implementation was crucial in obtaining a major contract modification –critical for getting strategic vision of vendor which would inform UWI future strategy
15
Lessons Learnt Change management –Should be integral part of implementation including pre and post periods More aggressive negotiation –“the customer is always right” –If the product is a customizable one then why should the customer fit the product’s requirements? Don’t try to do things in a short period – more time gives a less margin for errors Core Implementation Teams should be: –Multidisciplinary –Dedicated staff
16
Lessons Learnt continued Functional Teams should be more participatory – ‘buy-in’ mechanisms should be in place before project implementation begins User conference attendance – provides valuable information in making strategic decisions More onsite visits (extended periods) by vendor – would assist in better understanding of the system by the client and the environment by the vendor
17
Recommendations for Best Practices Cold periods should be used for project review at several stages of the project Enforce agreements made with vendor – VTLS Classic experience would have been invaluable to the project Longer project period – 18 months
18
Recommendations for Best Practices continued Ensure that vendor completely understands the concept of ‘one university’ that has different environments structurally, socially and culturally Ensure that training and configuration activities are scheduled concurrently or in tandem
19
Future Research SFX Metalib Verde Move towards unified information platform –library system –electronic resource management –institutional repository –digital resources management
20
Thank you Special thanks to Librarians Allison, Floris, Gerard, Kathleen Special thanks to co-authors - Sharon and Stella.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.