Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Farm Foundation Traceability and Quality Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003 Kansas City, MO National Animal ID: Value Traceability Opportunities Glenn.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Farm Foundation Traceability and Quality Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003 Kansas City, MO National Animal ID: Value Traceability Opportunities Glenn."— Presentation transcript:

1 Farm Foundation Traceability and Quality Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003 Kansas City, MO National Animal ID: Value Traceability Opportunities Glenn Smith USA Country Manager AgInfoLink USA

2 Providing traceability systems and business solutions to the food supply chain to increase profitability, promote food safety, and ensure regulatory compliance. A Member of the Alliance

3 Page 3 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Government & Regulators Consumers Food Chain FoodOrigins Tools Answer Key Questions  How can we improve input/product consistency?  How can we segregate defective and unaffected product quickly and safely?  How can this not be just another cost?  How can we improve input/product consistency?  How can we segregate defective and unaffected product quickly and safely?  How can this not be just another cost?  Where did “it” come from? Where is “it” now?  What processes has “it” been through?  How do we contact all the players using “it” with X number of hours?  Where did “it” come from? Where is “it” now?  What processes has “it” been through?  How do we contact all the players using “it” with X number of hours?  “What is in my food?”  Where did this food come from?  Is it safe?  “What is in my food?”  Where did this food come from?  Is it safe?

4 Page 4 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Traceability has two facets  Improved consistency  Higher yields  Lower cost per unit of production  Supply chain management  Justify brand claims – attribute x delivers result y  Lower cost new products Value Traceability Regulatory Traceability  Food safety requirements  Food security “record keeping”  Process Certification – like organic  Trace-back / forward / middle  Environmental requirements

5 Page 5 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Can’t Tell Book By Cover Which Animal Produced Highest Profit?

6 Page 6 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Tale of Two Steers Feeder Calf: $62.00/cwt$61.00/cwt Feedlot Wt: 508 lbs590 lbs Days on Feed: 161 ADG: 4.3 lbs/day2.4 lbs/day Quality Grade: Choice minusSelect minus Net Return: $322.93 profit$15.56 loss Want more of these cattle

7 Page 7 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Reduce Variation 1999 Grid Demonstration Project, Iowa State University 66 Pens Evaluated Average Value Variation $358 Least Value Variation $156 Greatest Value Variation $746

8 Page 8 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. “On the average, I’m happy…”

9 Page 9 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. "By using individual animal ID and creating a P&L for each animal, we were able to identify any cow whose calf didn't return at least a $15/head profit. If we eliminated these animals from the herd, we would have removed 13% of the herd but increased the average return per head by over $40." - John Todd, Rollins Ranches, FL Increase Returns

10 Page 10 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. “With individual animal data, I showed my stocker customer that eliminating the bottom 10% of poor performers would have lowered his cost of gain from $0.41/lbs to $0.36. This would have added $29 / head profit!” -Mark Williams, Triple W, KY Reduce Costs

11 Page 11 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. By managing flour procurement based on these factors, bakery performance can improve by an estimated 1.4 – 2.0% Yield Improvements

12 Page 12 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. AgInfoLink – Linking the chain Packer Distributor Retailer Seed Stock Cow Calf Stocker Feedlot Processor Capture and Share Info Among Many Owners Key is to LINK the chain – Bridge the Information Islands Table

13 Page 13 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Products and Services  Data collection  Data transfer  Data warehousing  Data sharing  Reporting and analysis  Data Benchmarking  Predictive Analysis

14 Page 14 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Real Solutions, Real Customers

15 Page 15 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. AgInfoLink – Building private networks

16 Page 16 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved.

17 Page 17 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Backbone Support: Connecting Networks

18 Page 18 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Regulatory Traceability: Supporting USDA / FDA  USDA / FDA charged with ensuring “rapid response” to ensure food safety by approving national systems and standards  This mandate is further driven by recent legislation which specifies new information requirements for individual supply chains  Country Of Origin Labeling in the 2002 Farm Bill  Bio-Terrorism Preparedness Act of 2002  National Animal ID pending  AgInfoLink private network tools enable supply chains to meet information requirements and support rapid response  Private networks collect data from partners and can provide information and reporting to meet both COOL and Bio-Terrorism requirements  These private networks connect to related networks and overall regulatory systems through secure, permission-granted protocols

19 Page 19 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved.  Without traceability, there is no way to limit the scope of a product recall in the instance of contamination. Recall It All Traceability Provides Security

20 Page 20 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Traceability delivers containment When a contamination incident occurs, the ingredient history of the product is traced and the potentially contaminated source ingredients are isolated. Most of the system remains “safe.” Selective Recall

21 Page 21 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Market Access  Japanese consumer consciousness toward traceability is relatively high, driven by  StarLink GMO’s  SnowBrand mislabeling  Chinese spinach pesticide contamination  Higher end retailers have created “premium priced private labels” to restore confidence  Food Safety is considered a “private sector problem requiring private sector solutions.”  Retailers (AEON/Jusco) developing voluntary traceability for beef  Importers (Nippon Ham, Prima Ham) developing own traceability requirements  Government finalizing requirements for domestic traceability for meats; some pushing for mandatory import traceability.

22 Page 22 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Japan: Private Label Retail Programs  Retailers in Japan are promoting premium-priced private label brands equated with quality, safety and trust based on origin Source: Aeon/JUSCO

23 Page 23 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Japan: Private Label Retail Programs  Aeon/JUSCO has introduced a beef brand supported by a certificate of assurance from the Tasmanian governor and an endorsement by the Australian ambassador, which runs on in-store video ads. JUSCO stores aim to be top 10 global supermarket chain in 5 years. Source: Aeon/JUSCO

24 Page 24 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Why Individual Livestock Identification and Traceability?  Value Traceability Systems  Improved management  Increased efficiencies  Reduced waste  Targeted Production  Create new values and reduce costs  Regulatory Traceability  Animal Disease Surveillance  Market Access  Rapid Response

25 Page 25 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Recommended High Level Architecture Data Service Providers Beef Info Exchange USDA Other Custodians

26 Page 26 © Copyright 2003 AgInfoLink USA. All rights reserved. Key BIE Architectural Elements  No data would populate government database until approved emergency  Ownership/location data would be pulled from Trusted Data Custodians (e.g., BIE) to government, never pushed  BIE would provide government database daily AIN list  Relationship between Data Service Provider members of BIE to BIE database could be either “push” or “pull”

27 Thank You! AgInfoLink USA 1860 Lefthand Circle, Suite G Longmont, CO 80501 800.287.8787 www.aginfolink.com Glenn Smith USA Country Manager 478.747.6539 glenn@aginfolink.com


Download ppt "Farm Foundation Traceability and Quality Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003 Kansas City, MO National Animal ID: Value Traceability Opportunities Glenn."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google