Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Accessibility and 508 easily with ColdFusion and FuseBox4 xml Sandra Clark

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Accessibility and 508 easily with ColdFusion and FuseBox4 xml Sandra Clark"— Presentation transcript:

1 Accessibility and 508 easily with ColdFusion and FuseBox4 xml Sandra Clark slclark@constellagroup.com

2 2 Overview Accessibility and Speech Browsers 508 and WAI Survey Stop Designing for the Browser The Good and the Bad of Fusebox A Better Way Exceptions to the Rule

3 3 Why are Accessible Web Sites Important Accessible Web Sites are important for all types of web sites. –15 – 30% of the general population have functional limitations that can affect their ability to use technology products (http://isoc.org/briefings/002)http://isoc.org/briefings/002 Accessibility helps those who: –Cannot use a mouse (only have access to keyboards) –Are blind –Have other vision impairments –Are Deaf –Are Color Blind.

4 4 What is 508 and WAI Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act Amendment of 1998 requires that US Federal Agencies and covered entities must make their electronic technology and information accessible to people with Disabilities WAI (Web Accessibility Initiative) by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) –WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) Deals with the authoring of web standards.

5 5 The United States isn’t Alone Other countries have or are adopting and require adherence to either the WCAG or something similar.  Australia (W3C WCAG)  Canada (W3C WCAG Priority 1 and 2 checkpoints)  EU (W3C WCAG Priority 1)  Belgium  Denmark  Finland  France (WC3 WCAG)  Germany  Greece  Japan  Ireland  Italy (WCAG)  Luxemburg  Netherlands  New Zealand  Portugal (WCAG)  Singapore  Spain (WCAG)  Sweden  United Kingdom (WCAG)

6 6 Survey In December 2002, I surveyed the entry home pages of 204 Federal Cabinet and their Departments. –These are the entities REQUIRED to comply with Section 508 Validated with a number of readers –Bobby (Online 508 and WAI Validator) –Simply Web 2000 (Free Speech Browser) –pw Web Speak (Free, discontinued Speech Browser) –IBM Home Page Reader (Speech Browser) –Lynx (Text Only Browser)

7 7 Survey Results Out of 204 Web Sites Surveyed –Bobby Approved 77 pages passed (38%) –Simply Web 2000 5 pages passed (2%) –pwWebSpeak 50 pages passed (25%) –IBM Home Page Reader 58 pages passed (28%) –Lynx 182 pages passed (89%)

8 8 GUESS WHAT? LYNX IS NOT A Speech Browser! –Having something readable in Lynx is not indicative that it will be readable in a Screen reader.

9 9 Validating Accessibility Validating Accessibility is like Validating a Web Site. –Use Validation Testing Bobby or UsableNet’s Lift –Different Speech Browsers But who has the time and money to test to make sure it works everywhere? –This is what happens when people design sites for the letter of the law rather than the spirit.

10 10 Designing to the letter of the law MEANS: –The HTML passes Bobby. –It works in the one screen reader you tested for and that’s the one you tell everyone to use. –If you get sued, you can point to the above two points and hope its enough for the judge.

11 11 Designing to the Spirit of the Law MEANS –That the content of your web site or application can be read and understood no matter what type of browser is being used. –That all disabled persons have the same type of access to your web site as able bodied people. –You don’t have to worry about convincing a judge because there is no reason for a lawsuit based on accessibility issues.

12 12 How can we do that? JavaScript is only used for nice-to-haves and the absence of it does not diminish the usability of your site. –This covers DHTML. If you must have a DHTML menu have a link at the top letting people use another menuing system. Plug ins must be accessible or there must be equivalent content in an accessible format. The most important thing we can do is:

13 13 Stop Designing to the Browser Remember the browser wars? –Marquee and Blink? I remember signing a petition asking Netscape and MS to make their browsers work with standards –They did (MS IE 6, Netscape 7 and Opera 6) are compliant. –Guess What? We aren’t taking advantage of this We still design for the browser. DESIGN TO THE STANDARD

14 14 Design to the Standards What "Standards"? –When we speak about "standards" for the Web, we mean: Structural Languages – XHTML  Extensible Hypertext Markup Language 1.0 and 1.1  http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1  http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11 http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml11 –XML  Extensible Markup Language 1.0  http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006 http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006 Presentation Languages –CSS  Cascading Style Sheets Levels 1 and 2  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2 –as well as emerging standards, such as those for television and PDA based browsers.

15 15 Design to the Standards What "Standards (cont)"? Presentation Languages –CSS  Cascading Style Sheets Levels 1 and 2  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS1  http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2 http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS2 –as well as emerging standards, such as those for television and PDA based browsers.

16 16 Why design to the standard “Designing and building with these standards simplifies and lowers the cost of production, while delivering sites that are accessible to more people and more types of Internet devices. Sites developed along these lines will continue to function correctly as traditional desktop browsers evolve, and as new Internet devices come to market.” –http://www.webstandards.org

17 17 Using Nested Tables for Layouts Most of us use tables for layout. –This is not what tables in HTML were designed for By using tables for layouts, we are not only limiting ourselves, but we are limiting the ways in which our work can be utilized. Tables are limiting, the web is designed to be limitless.

18 18 Separating Content from Presentation Content is the most important aspect of the web. –What you get is more important than how you see it. Separating Content from Presentation gives you –Increased accessibility –Improved Performance –Easier initial work and easier maintenance.

19 19 CSS and Positioning By using Cascading Style Sheets for positioning and design, we are truly separating content from presentation. All Major Browsers (IE 6, Netscape 7, Opera 6) support CSS-2 (which includes Positioning). XHTML requires CSS for all presentation in its strict format. CSS-2 allows different style sheets to be employed for different media. –Change the way your page looks on a printer without changing the page.

20 20 Fusebox 4 and Accessibility The Fusebox philosophy encourages separation of business logic from presentation logic which is good. –With CFMX, Macromedia is also encouraging separation of the two tiers with CFC’s. Makes design patterns like MVC easy! With the new version of Fusebox 4 xml, layouts are fully under the architect’s control. –Fully allows for separating presentation and content which are necessary for fully accessible and compliant web sites

21 21 Layouts and Fusebox 4 xml Content from a fuseaction can be captured into a content variable.

22 22 Displaying content variables Many ways to display your content. Have a layout file in the fusebox.xml.cfm file.

23 23 In lay_default. #showme#

24 24 What about Netscape 4? Browser Statistics from thecounter.com shows that Netscape usage has gone from 5.4% usage in 11/2001 to 2.3% in 11/2002 Netscape and MSIE 4 and older editions do not support CSS 2.

25 25 Browser Stats 11/2001 – 11/2002

26 26 What about Flash? Macromedia is pushing CFMX and Flash MX as a Rich User Interface. Flash MX does have some accessibility built in. –Flash Player 6 now uses the Microsoft Active Accessibility (MSAA) API to exchange information with a web browser that supports MSAA, which channels information to and from assistive technologies that support MSAA.Microsoft Active Accessibility (MSAA) API –Today, the only screen reader that allows users to interact with Flash content is Windows-Eyes from GW Micro. Objects that can’t be currently made accessible include: –invisible buttons and some specific form components: combo boxes, list boxes, and scroll bars.

27 27 Recommendations and Resources Web Sites –http://www.webstandards.orghttp://www.webstandards.org –http://www.alistapart.comhttp://www.alistapart.com –http://www.glish.comhttp://www.glish.com FuseBox4 –http://beta.fusebox.orghttp://beta.fusebox.org 508 –http://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/index.htmhttp://www.access-board.gov/sec508/guide/index.htm Bobby –http://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsphttp://bobby.watchfire.com/bobby/html/en/index.jsp

28 28 Recommendations and Resources Discovering Fusebox 4 (September 2003) –Publisher - Techspedition –Authors: John Quarto von- Tividar, Sandy Clark, Brian LeRoux, Perry Woodin Constructing Accessible Web Sites –Publisher – Glasshaus –Author: Jim Thatcher Cascading Style Sheets: Separating Content from Presentation –Publisher – Glasshaus –Author: Owen Briggs Core CSS –Publisher Prentice Hall –Author: Keith Schengili - Roberts


Download ppt "Accessibility and 508 easily with ColdFusion and FuseBox4 xml Sandra Clark"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google