Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMargaret Gaines Modified over 9 years ago
1
VRE SYSTEM PLAN WEBINAR October 9, 2013 Christine Hoeffner, VRE Foster Nichols, Parsons Brinckerhoff
2
Webinar Overview Introduction of presenters Format of webinar Participant questions 2
3
SYSTEM PLAN OVERVIEW 3
4
4 What is a System Plan? Re-set the vision for VRE’s future Evaluate alternative future scenarios Ridership growth Capacity needs Capital project requirements Funding and partnership strategies Develop decision-making framework
5
5 What is a System Plan? The VRE System Plan will not Be prescriptive Develop fully-designed capital projects Guarantee funding availability Compel other entities to act Be a regional transportation plan
6
VRE’S ROLE IN REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 6
7
Sustained Ridership Growth Total Ridership has tripled since inception and doubled in last decade 7 System Total Fredericksburg Manassas 6,260 5,250 11,510 7,370 6,590 13,950 9,780 9,100 18,880 15-year trend: +8% per year
8
VRE Ridership Market Share Fredericksburg Line to Core Fredericksburg – Brooke >50% Quantico – Woodbridge 10%-50% Lorton <10% Manassas Line to Core Broad Run – Manassas Park 10%-50% Burke Centre – Backlick Rd. <10% Future growth in VRE ridership will result from: Population growth in the Outer Zone Increased service in the Inner Zone Middle Zone Markets Inner Zone Markets Core Markets Outer Zone Markets 8
9
PROPOSED SYSTEM PLAN INITIATIVES 9
10
Group C Implement Regional Rail Service Concepts Group B Expand Service in Core VRE Territory Group A Maximize Service Within Existing Operating Capacity & Agreements Potential VRE Service Initiatives 10
11
11 Definitions “Group” A set of “initiatives” that share similar characteristics and level of complexity The differences among groups are not entirely hard and fast The System Plan is likely to combine ideas from all three groups “Initiative” A VRE service concept Composed of a set of capital projects that enable the service May require changes to railroad operating agreements or other agreements “Project” The building block of initiatives, such as additional track, station parking or train storage capacity
12
8 car trains (ultimately 10 cars) Increase size of fleet Increase station and yard capacity Group A: Longer Trains 12 Mid-Week PM Peak Passenger Loads and Seating Capacity by Train, 2013 Fredericksburg Line Manassas Line Passengers at Peak Capacity with Train Lengthened to 10 cars
13
13 Group A: Additional Peak Trains 2 Available 2 16 VRE Daily train slots per MOU: VRE Manassas Trains VRE Fredericksburg Trains Virginia Intercity Trains Available Unused Slots Limited opportunities to grow Cap on daily trains Constrained train storage 1-2 additional round trips on each line Relieve overcrowding on existing trains 2 14 VRE
14
14 Group A Initiatives Potential core system expansion projects Additional station parking Station access improvements Longer station platforms Additional rolling stock Increased train storage capacity
15
Group B: Increase Peak Period VRE Service More weekday peak trains (AM inbound, PM outbound) Service options 20 minute headways Outer zone express service Expand peak service windows 15
16
Haymarket Gainesville Sudley Manor 16 Group B: Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Within existing VRE service area Provides I-66 congestion relief Potential multi-modal hubs and reverse commute opportunities
17
Group B: Reverse Commute Service New travel market for VRE Smaller market but locally significant More efficient use of trains and DC mid-day storage Requires additional system capacity Operating slots Additional track Second platforms at stations 17
18
Group B: Off-Peak Service Mid-day, Evening, and/or Weekends Provides flexible travel for commuters and others Taps additional markets Requirements similar to Reverse-Commute service 18
19
Group B: All-Day Bi-Directional Service Maximizes VRE ridership potential Supports efficient operations Provides regional transportation benefits “Whole is greater than the sum of the parts” 19 M M M M M
20
20 Group B Initiatives Additional core system investments beyond Group A Second platforms at VRE stations Railroad infrastructure to support bi-directional passenger operations Long Bridge/Alexandria to DC rail corridor Additional triple-tracking on Fredericksburg Line Manassas-Haymarket rail line capacity
21
Group C: Regional Rail Concepts VRE run through to MARC Camden and Brunswick Lines Service to Silver Spring, Rockville, College Park, Savage (Ft. Meade) and Baltimore Potential mid-day storage opportunities 21
22
Group C: Regional Rail Concepts MARC run through to Alexandria Significant travel market MARC trains supplement or replace VRE service Requires station and yard improvements in Virginia 22
23
Group C: Regional Rail Concepts Combined VRE & MARC run through service Reverse-commute service as Initial Step Ultimate Potential Fully-integrated regional rail network Frequent service between Union Station and Alexandria 23
24
24 Package C Initiatives Basic capital needs similar to Group B Rolling Stock and Station Platforms Initial step can use existing VRE and MARC fleets Ultimate potential realized with a uniform fleet Station platform considerations for ADA compliance Washington Union Terminal Run through service reduces train storage needs Investment to increase capacity for through service (TBD) Expanded operating agreements
25
NEXT STEPS 25
26
Next Steps Analysis of Improvement Initiatives Ridership market impact Capital cost and incremental operating costs Benefits and implementation considerations Adoption by VRE Operations Board – December 2013 Priority projects included in VRE annual budget and CIP Ongoing stakeholder and interagency outreach 26
27
QUESTIONS 27
28
Thank You! Additional information about the System Plan http://www.vre.org/about/strategic/strategic_plan.htm http://www.vre.org/about/strategic/strategic_plan.htm Submit questions about the System Plan VRESystemPlan@vre.org 28
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.