1. Next Generation 3D Imaging Models SEG Research Committee (modeling sub-committee) Bill Abriel Lewis Bartel Bee Bednar Biondo Biondi Joakim Blanch Arthur Cheng Richard Day Gregory Elbring Mike Fehler Leigh House Stewart Levin Matthias Imhof Neill Simon

2. Cooperative Motivation Shared numerical models have been advantageous (e.g. Marmousi, SEG 3D subsalt) New problems worth working on are of a size and cost not likely to be born by any one organization 3-D AVO analysis elastic inversion fracture detection prestack geometric attribute analysis shear wave splitting reservoir characterization OBC acquisition, illumination, and analysis multi-component data processing converted wave velocity analysis and imaging polarization filtering Q compensation 3-D prestack migration in rugged topography

3. Window of opportunity for cooperative project Computational Cost Years 2005200620072008 Too expensive 3-D two-ways acoustic 3-D two-ways elastic ? 3-D one-way elastic 2.5-D two-ways elastic No need of cooperative project

4. Window of opportunity for cooperative project Computational Cost Years 2005200620072008 Too expensive 3-D two-ways acoustic 3-D two-ways elastic ? 3-D one-way elastic 2.5-D two-ways elastic No need of cooperative project 3-D two-ways elastic

5. Modeling Project Evolution Discussions among motivated colleagues (Stanford SEP etc.) 2004 Ad-hoc meeting at SEG 2004 Denver (including EAGE) –Biondi, Abriel, House, Bednar (and many others – names available) –Recognized rapid advancement in the past 10 years in sophistication of geophysical problems, modeling codes, compute speed, knowledge of properties and physics –Concluded there is significant momentum for modeling project –Recognized need for many models and many years to accomplish things in a step- wise fashion (e.g. elastic follows acoustic) –Proposed a consortium driven by SEG research committee SEG research committee meeting 2005 –Agrees to be project “owner” –Suggest major role for long term project manager (Bee Bednar nominated) –Requests administrative assistance from SEG HQ

6. SEG executive committee meeting May 2005 Request is to become non-profit SEG “project” with cost recovery. Run by project manager, responsible to consortium members, but under SEG legal controls. Why the SEG ?? A Cooperative activity –Less conflicts of interest than being driven by a university or an oil company –Consistent with SEG charter to advance profession SEG can provide mechanism for contractual and fiscal controls SEG “ownership” provides evergreen intellectual interest –Catalyst for geophysical progress and collaboration –SEG can provide free data for educational purposes (donate to student sections, utility in SEG courses) –opportunity for collaboration with AAPG/SPE in modeling geophysical response of important geology and fluid flow

7. Business proposal to be developed for distribution Operational structure –Fees $30-$50k / yr (initial 2 yr commitment) –Data exclusive for paying members 2 years –Data can be distributed to educational and non-profit organizations with consensus of paying members – Open access after 2 years (recover copy and storage costs) –SEG fiscal and contractual controls –Project manager for planning, operations, communication and coordination Plans for modeling (2-5 years) –Coordinate with Delft 3D physical model (subsalt) –Expand numerical options in acquisition (Marine patch 3D, 3D VSP etc..) –Build numerous small models to grow expertise in properties (anisotropy, elastic propagation, 4D production effects, complex stratigraphy ….) –Tests and benchmarks of modeling codes and compute resources Start-up planned for Fall 2005 (at or prior to SEG convention)

8. Operator (SEG) Tax-free status Legal, fiscal and contractual controls Executive Committee Participants (voting) + SEG officer SEG Research chair EAGE advisor Bi-annual Funding Technical program approval Funding approvals Project Manager Model design working group Numerical modeling and software working group Model execution (contract ?) Data distribution and archive (contract ) Analysis working group

9. Start-up plan (Summer 2005) Goal: Gather momentum before and at SEG convention to secure wide support for the project (e.g. sign up 20-25 paying companies). Before SEG –Sign-up 6-8 Majors (Major = Major oil company and Large contractor) => Funding Members –Assemble a “model design working group” collecting model components from Funding Members »The Model Design Group should produce a conceptual design of the geological model before SEG. »The group should meet 2-3 times before SEG (first tentative meeting on July 12th at CSM). –Assemble a “numerical algorithm and software” working group to identify candidate for computations At SEG –Present project during already scheduled SEG Post-Convention Workshop –Involve SPE and AAPG in the process by inviting representative to SEG workshop After SEG –Finalize contractual and legal framework –Sign-up medium-size companies –Try to get Grid-vendors (e.g. IBM, Sun) to support project –START

10. Ziggy physical 3D subsalt Numerical equivalent With enhancements Ziggy physical 3D subsalt Acquisition data sets 1.3D VSP 2.Multi –azimuth 3.… Small scale properties (e.g. velocity) Complex elastic parameters Specific stratigraphy 1 st Q 2006 2 nd Q 2006 1st Q 2007 (?) Etc…………