1. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 1 Case Study: Kłodnica catchment, (Odra river basin) Poland Janusz Krupanek Institut for Ecology of Industrial Areas

2. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 2 Introduction case study: Kłodnica Kłodnica catchment area 1125,8 km² (Odra river basin) Flow rate: around 20 m 3 /s at the mouth of the river Population of 1 mln. inhabitants (Upper Silesia region) Land use: agriculture 50 %, Urban and Industrial 30%, forest 20% Industry (coal mining, energy sector, metallurgy, metal production, mechanical sector, chemical industry) Functions: receptor for anthropogenic water, water retention, recreation, source of water for industry, ecological protection Impact: WWTP, industry, contaminated land, wastes, air deposition PAH, Hg, Cd as relevant contaminants (representative for coal and heavy industries)

3. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 3 Introduction case study: Kłodnica Kłodnica catchment - Highly Modified Water Body located in urbanized and industrialized region –chemical water quality goals to be achieved by 2015 –ecological good status (not defined yet) Water Management Plan (Odra/Kłodnica) under public consultation (no specifications on priority pollutants) Monitoring system under national revision – to be improved Priorities for water management defined (priority pollutants not explicitly indicated) Environmental spending in priority pollutants related sectors (WWTP, waste management, industry) 700 mln Euro (years 2005 – 2015)

4. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 4

5. 5 Specific challenges Limited knowledge and understanding (data extent and reliability) –relatively easy to identify point sources of discharge. –difficult to make the evaluation on the emission (detection limit, way of reporting) –difficult to assess ecological response of the water system High importance of autonomous developments (baseline scenario): –ongoing socio-economical activities and changes –undertaken and planned investments in water protection infrastructure –impact of EU policies and opportunities arising

6. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 6 Specific challenges The institutional issue: –Complex management pattern and decision making process – the division of competences and responsibilities between local, regional and national administration e.g. mining issue as governmental problem –Data provision: water quality monitoring integration, practices of emissions reporting –Efficiency of law execution e.g. not controlled emissions The political issue: –low policy relevance of priority pollutants Public awareness, interest and perception

7. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 7 Lessons learned from case study Strong interaction with stakeholders helps in better understanding of the existing and future problems and to define the main challenges for the catchment Problem definition depends highly on quality of accessible information concerning water, chemical and ecological status Uncetainty evaluation and understanding is very important – establishing level of data reliability required for decision making in river quality management Institutional aspect is very important to be included in the decision making process along with technical and socio- economic aspects

8. Final Conference June 24 - 25 Maastricht, The Netherlands 8 Lessons learned from case study It is important to take into account co-benefits and multi goal approaches related to various basic actions and policies underataken or planned in the catchment. For substance oriented additional measures, the cost benefit ratio can be expected much higher The management cycle as defined in WFD is very important allowing for step by step approach in complex situations and gradual improvement of the river quality (derogations) DSS application currently (2009 –2013) is limited due to existing relevant management conditions DSS can be effectively used within second round of management 2015 – 2021