Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAdela Porter Modified over 9 years ago
1
Thermodynamics of Dielectric Relaxations in Complex Systems TUTORIAL 3
2
Static dipoles It is necessary to found the Relation between microscopic polarizability and macroscopic permittivity. It is necessary to found the Relation between microscopic polarizability and macroscopic permittivity. From the phenomenological point of view, it is necessary to know the kinetic of the Polarization. From the phenomenological point of view, it is necessary to know the kinetic of the Polarization. From molecular one it’s required the knowledge of the effective Electric field at which the dipole is subjected. From molecular one it’s required the knowledge of the effective Electric field at which the dipole is subjected. 4 different ways are proposed to evaluate the molecular: 4 different ways are proposed to evaluate the molecular: –Claussius – Mossotti –Debye –Onsager –Fouss – Kirkwood
3
The basic idea is to consider a a spherical zone containing the dipole under study, immersed in the dielectric. The sphere is small in comparison with the dimension of the condenser, but large compared with the molecular dimensions. We treat the properties of the sphere at the microscopic level as containing many molecules, but the material outside of the sphere is considered a continuum. The field acting at the center of the sphere where the dipole is placed arises from the field due to (1) the charges on the condenser plates (2) the polarization charges on the spherical surface, and (3) the molecular dipoles in the spherical region. Lorentz local field
4
EoEo + + + + + + -- - - - - dd
5
Claussius – Mossotti equation valid for nonpolar gases at low pressure. This expression is also valid for high frequency limit. The remaining problem to be solved is the calculation of the dipolar contribution to the polarizability.
6
Debye, extended the Claussius – Mossotti equation adding a new term in the polarization (orientational polarization). By this way the dipolar contribution it’s taking into account Debye equation for the static permittivity
7
Onsager, generalize the Debye equation taking into account the effect of the if the permanent dipole moment of a molecule by the polarization of the environment. Onsager, generalize the Debye equation taking into account the effect of the if the permanent dipole moment of a molecule by the polarization of the environment. 1 – The cavity field, G, (the field produced in the empty cavity by the external field.) 1 – The cavity field, G, (the field produced in the empty cavity by the external field.) 2 - The reaction field, R (the field produced in the cavity by the polarization induced by the surrounding dipoles). 2 - The reaction field, R (the field produced in the cavity by the polarization induced by the surrounding dipoles).
8
Onsager treatment of the cavity differs from Lorentz’s because the cavity is assumed to be filled with a dielectric material having a macroscopic dielectric permittivity. Onsager treatment of the cavity differs from Lorentz’s because the cavity is assumed to be filled with a dielectric material having a macroscopic dielectric permittivity. Also Onsager studies the dipolar reorientation polarizability on statistical grounds as Debye does. Also Onsager studies the dipolar reorientation polarizability on statistical grounds as Debye does. The remaining problem is to take into account the interaction between dipoles The remaining problem is to take into account the interaction between dipoles Kirkwood and Fröhlich develop a fully statistical argument to determine the short – range dipole – dipole interaction. Kirkwood and Fröhlich develop a fully statistical argument to determine the short – range dipole – dipole interaction.
9
g will be different from 1 when there is correlation between the orientations of neighboring molecules. g will be different from 1 when there is correlation between the orientations of neighboring molecules. When the molecules tend to direct themselves with parallel dipole moments, will be positive and g>1. When the molecules tend to direct themselves with parallel dipole moments, will be positive and g>1. When the molecules prefer an ordering withanti-parallel dipoles, g<1 When the molecules prefer an ordering with anti-parallel dipoles, g<1. g =1 in the case of no dipolar correlation between neighboring molecules, or equivalently a dipole does not influence the position and orientations of the neighboring ones. g =1 in the case of no dipolar correlation between neighboring molecules, or equivalently a dipole does not influence the position and orientations of the neighboring ones. g depends on the structure of the material, and for this reason it is a parameter that fives information about the forces of local type. g depends on the structure of the material, and for this reason it is a parameter that fives information about the forces of local type.
10
From Kremer – Schonhals book
12
Claussius – Mossotti: Only valid for non polar gases, at low pressure Debye: Include the distortional polarization. Onsager: Include the orientational polarization, but neglected the interaction between dipoles. describe the dielectric behavior on non-interacting dipolar fluids Kirkwood: include correlation factor (interaction dipole-dipole) Fröhlich – Kirkwood – Onsager
13
Orientational polarization ( ) Induced polarization E(t) ss Dynamic theory
14
Debye equation First order kinetic: First order kinetic: Decay function: Decay function: In frequency domain In frequency domain 1,14
15
Debye equation doesn’t represent in a good way the experimental data. Debye equation doesn’t represent in a good way the experimental data. Some modifications in the decay function was proposed by Williams – Watt, ussing a previously Kolraush equation. Some modifications in the decay function was proposed by Williams – Watt, ussing a previously Kolraush equation. Advantages: represent better the experimental data. Advantages: represent better the experimental data. Disadvantages: the parameter it’s an artificial parameter and no molecular relation for this parameter have been yet found Disadvantages: the parameter it’s an artificial parameter and no molecular relation for this parameter have been yet found
18
DISPERSION RELATIONS The real and imaginary part of the complex permittivity are, respectively, the cosine and sine Fourier transforms of the same function, that is, ( ). As a consequence, ’ and " are no independent. The real and imaginary part of the complex permittivity are, respectively, the cosine and sine Fourier transforms of the same function, that is, ( ). As a consequence, ’ and " are no independent. Kramer-Kronigs relationships
20
Thermodynamics Thermodynamics appear in the XIX century because of the necessity of describe the thermal machines. Thermodynamics appear in the XIX century because of the necessity of describe the thermal machines. It is based in postulates, without mathematical demonstration, and as the mechanics and electromagnetic postulates, establish the basic physic laws. It is based in postulates, without mathematical demonstration, and as the mechanics and electromagnetic postulates, establish the basic physic laws.
21
Thermodynamic FUNCTIONS FUNCTIONS Enthalpy (H) Enthalpy (H) Entropy (S) Entropy (S) Internal Energy (U) Internal Energy (U) Free Energy (G) Free Energy (G) VARIABLES VARIABLES Temperature Temperature Density or volume Density or volume Pressure Pressure Characteristic properties of materials Calorific capacity Expansion coefficient Electric Permittivity
22
Thermodynamic postulates Thermodynamic are based in 4 fundamentals laws: Thermodynamic are based in 4 fundamentals laws: U= Q-W (First law) (Energy balance) U= Q-W (First law) (Energy balance) S iso ≥ 0(Second law) S iso ≥ 0(Second law) Thermal equilibrium (Zero law): 2 systems in equilibrium with one 3 rd are in equilibrium between them. Thermal equilibrium (Zero law): 2 systems in equilibrium with one 3 rd are in equilibrium between them. Perfect Crystals at 0 K, define 0 entropy. (Third law) Perfect Crystals at 0 K, define 0 entropy. (Third law)
23
Thermodynamics relates the properties of macroscopic systems. Thermodynamics relates the properties of macroscopic systems. The macroscopic properties are originated in the statistical average properties of microscopic properties. The macroscopic properties are originated in the statistical average properties of microscopic properties. Thermodynamic point of view Microscopic property Statistical average Thermodynamic property
24
Thermodynamics is usually concerned with very specific systems at equilibrium. In nature, the processes are mainly irreversible. Their description requires going beyond equilibrium.
25
THERMODYNAMICS OF IRREVERSIBLE PROCESSES The four main postulates of the theory are: 1 - The local and instantaneous relations between thermal and mechanical properties of a physical system are the same as for a uniform system at equilibrium. This is the so-called local equilibrium hypothesis. 2 - The internal entropy arising from irreversible phenomena inside a volume element is always a non-negative quantity. This is a local formulation of the second law of thermodynamics 3 - The internal entropy has a very simple character. It is a sum of terms, each being the product of a flux and a thermodynamic force 4 - The phenomenological description relating irreversible fluxes to thermodynamic forces are assumed to be linear.
26
MAXWELL EQUATIONS where c is the velocity of light. The total charge density, , and the total current density, J are taken as the sources of the field If the magnetization is assumed to be zero, for a polarizable fluid, the Current will correspond to free charges and the polarization rate. And the charge density correspond to the free and polarization density J total current, J f electric current of free charges, f density of free charges, p density of polarization charges, and P/ t polarization current
27
Taking into account the relations between the electric displacement and the electric field, we can obtain a different version of the Maxwell equation can be written as:
28
Conservation equations Mass: Mass: In the absence of chemical reactions, the rate of change in mass within a volume V can be written as the flux through the surface dS according to: , and v are, respectively, the mass density and velocity. Charge: free charges Charge: free charges Polarization charges
29
Conservation equations Linear momentum: The equation indicates that the force exerted by the electromagnetic field on the material within the volume V is equal to the rate of decrease in electromagnetic momentum within V plus the rate at which electromagnetic momentum is transferred into V across the surface V. is the momentum density is the density of the Lorentz force identified with the body forces =ED + HB - ½ (E·D + H·B)I is the Maxwell stress tensor; can be interpreted as the moment flux density.
30
Conservation equations Energy: Energy: The Poynting vector determines the density and direction of this flux at each point of the surface. Poynting vector electromagnetic energy flux through the surface. work per time unit spent in production of conduction currents. time rate of change in the field energy within the region
31
Internal Energy Equation The total energy can be expressed as Potential energy Kinetic energy Electromagnetic energy
32
ENTROPY EQUATION For a single component system the corresponding Gibbs equation is Internal energy polarization charge density
33
RELAXATION EQUATION Using the entropy and energy balance equation, it is possible to express the relationship between the polarization rate and the thermodynamics functions if T o is constant and q= dJ/dt=0, Eq (3.6.1) reduces to the well-known Debye equation: Debye equation predict instantaneous propagation of the perturbation
34
The Debye equations derived do not adequately represent the experimental behavior of polymers. Instead of a symmetric semicircular arc, an asymmetric and skewed arc is observed. To represent in a more accurate way the actual behavior, some modifications to the former theory must be made. A more general relationship between forces and fluxes as follows where the operator D 1 represents the fractional derivatives of order (0< <1).
35
Fractional derivatives were introduced in the theory of viscoelastic relaxations to give account of the deviations of the experimental data from those predicted by classical linear models, such as Maxwell and Kelvin-Voigt models, which are combinations of springs and dashpots In terms of decay equation, the fractional derivatives it’s equivalent to stretch the decay function instead of the exponent. In terms of decay equation, the fractional derivatives it’s equivalent to stretch the decay function instead of the exponent. Or which is the same, to chose a kinetic order different to 1(0< <1). Or which is the same, to chose a kinetic order different to 1(0< <1).
36
Under some considerations, the Laplace transform of the fractional derivative equation leads to the Havriliak Negammi empirical equation This equation, contrary to the Debye equation, adequately predicts the shape of the actual dielectric data in the relaxation zones
38
Advantages: Advantages: It’s possible to fit experimental data with HN equation. It’s possible to fit experimental data with HN equation. Disadvantages: Disadvantages: It’s based on phenomenological point of view. It’s not possible to relate the exponents with the molecular structure. (no physical meaning) It’s based on phenomenological point of view. It’s not possible to relate the exponents with the molecular structure. (no physical meaning)
39
Summary From thermodynamic point of view it is also possible to obtain the relaxation equations. From thermodynamic point of view it is also possible to obtain the relaxation equations. The use of thermodynamics in dielectric materials relate the macroscopic properties with microscopic ones. The use of thermodynamics in dielectric materials relate the macroscopic properties with microscopic ones.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.