1. Chapter 7 Altruism, Kin Selection, and Parenting

2. (Basic) Altruism Cost to self for the benefit of another Evolutionary interpretation doesn’t require intent Kin selection

3. Fitness Direct and indirect fitness Together make inclusive fitness Coefficient of relatedness, r Explains issues of kin selection

4. Kin Selection Selection that operates on an individual in any way that effects the frequency of genes shared by common descent in relatives Hamilton’s rule: rb>c

5. Proximate or Ultimate Levels of causation Altruistic act Proximate level: altruistic –Consider the individual as the active unit/agent –Donor loses out, but recipient gains Ultimate level: selfish –Consider the genes as the active units/agents –Donor loses direct fitness, but gains enough indirect fitness to offset loss in long run

6. Domestic Violence High proportion of murders –Approximately 25% Conflict with fitness accounts? Maybe not… –Approximately 4/5 domestic murders are relatives by marriage –Only 1 in 5 are relatives by blood

7. Risk Relative Risk of Homocide 43214321 Spouses Other Nonrelative OffspringParent Other relatives

8. Alliances Mothers and sons –Ally against father Oedipus complex –Sexual competition between fathers and sons Evolutionary interpretation –Successful polygamist –Resources –Mother’s interest coincides with son’s

9. Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitane King of England 1154-1189 Married 1152 –Eleanor 12 years older –Henry unfaithful 5 sons, 3 daughters –Richard the Lionhearted, John I –Division of lands Rebellion in 1173 –Eleanor sides with sons –Imprisoned until 1189

10. Kin Selection and Kin Conflict Doesn’t predict altruism must occur Just that altruism is more likely to occur, all else being equal Costs and benefits –If benefits high enough, kin can be sacrificed –Altruism shifts to selfishness

11. Take Home Message Biological kinship is important –Discriminate in favour of kin –E.g., Shavit et al. (1994), air raid shelters –E.g., Burnstein et al. (1994), hypothetical life/death situations and the giving of aid But, favourable kinship discrimination is not inviolable –Kinship is only one factor in behaviour determination Inclusive vs. direct fitness

12. Adoption Violation of kin selection? –Hamilton’s rule –rB > C Maladaptive, neutral, adaptive? Who? When? Why? EEA? Silk’s (1990) work on South Pacific society Chimpanzee aunts

13. Step Parenting One biological parent, one non-biological Conflict Resources, energy, reproduction

14. Lions Females stay with pride, young males leave Dominant male displaced New male needs to impregnate females quickly –Systematic killing of predecessor’s cubs Effects of nursing –Reduction in ovulation --> reduced probability of conception –Selected for through evolution –Lactation stops, ovulation returns to normal --> increases male lion’s direct fitness Similar pattern of behaviour seen in primates (e.g., langurs) and birds

15. Human Condition Martin Daly and Margo Wilson Step-children stand an increased risk of maltreatment from their step-parent Canadian step children –60 times more likely to suffer fatal abuse by step-parent than children living with genetic parents Step-parent investment –Sacrifice of reproductive success

16. Resource Limitation Finite parental resources Examples –Homeless adolescents in New York –In Britain, genetic and step parent have lower educational aspirations for stepchild –In USA, stepchildren in university receive less financial help from parents

17. Human Complexity Network of: –Connections –Obligations Step-child and step parent Parent and step parent Half-siblings

18. Trends Severity/incidence of child maltreatment decreases with age of child –Disagrees with non-evolutionary theory Wide range of abuse types Abuse decreases as mother’s age increases Type of fatal abuse –Step-parent: bludgeoned, kicked, battered –Genetic parent: “less assaultive”; murder-suicide

19. Cross Cultural USA, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, Finland, Japan, Korea, Nigeria, Hong Kong, Trinidad Not identical, but similar patterns

20. An Adapted Trait? Sexually selected infanticide –Currently non-adaptive or maladaptive in humans –Humans aren’t lions or langurs Reciprocity –Risky –e.g., child abusers in prison

21. Parental Considerations Present and future survivorship Future fertility Personal genetic fitness Gain from reproduction vs. loss from change in life cycle Environmental constraints

22. Having Multiple Offspring Insurance hypothesis Opportunism hypothesis –Resource dependent

23. Infanticide Non-normative behaviour Cross-cultural Last resort

24. Optimization Decisions Abandonment of young and/or old Personal vs. offspring survival Survive to reproduce another day –RV

25. Limited Parental Resources Abandonment –Personal parental survival ranked above offspring survival –Live to reproduce another day Abortion –Age dependent

26. Foetal Fitness: Spontaneous Abortions 30-75% Low quality embryo –Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) Signal’s embryo’s fitness --> progesterone Mother’s ability –Environmental constraints –Genotype

27. Poor Infant Quality Physical and/or mental disability –Investment cost vs. genetic pay-off Disabilities may be relatively minor –Phenotypic signals of genotype e.g., breech birth correlated with SIDS

28. Sex Ratios Fisher’s principle –Male births infrequent --> male finds many mates Parents that produce more males will get more grandchildren Male-producing gene spreads Males outnumber females –Now, female births infrenquent --> female can pick mate Selection favours female-producing genes Feedback loop ---> 50/50 sex ratio

29. Trivers-Willard Effect Slight modification of Fisher’s principle Not equal numbers of each sex Preference for children of a particular sex Biased sex ratio Investment in each sex balanced against the sex’s reproductive potential Which sex is going to be more reproductively successful?

30. Trivers-Willard Reasoning Large, healthy males mate more than small males; almost all females mate Healthiest females produce healthiest offspring, which grow into largest adults Therefore: –healthy females should produce more males than females –less healthy females should produce more females than males

31. Factors In utero differentiation –Maternal stress --> higher male fetal mortality Infanticide –Intentional and unintentional Adult sex ratio –Sex ratio at birth –Differences in male/female maturation times –Differential male/female mortality

32. Local Resource Enhancement Offspring of one sex provide greater assistance to parents –Increase parents’ reproductive output –Greater investment in this sex –Helpers-at-the-nest model Local resource competition

33. Teen Pregnancy Ignorance or unintended Deliberate attempt to gain resources –Social security and/or husband Adaptive reproductive strategy?

34. Female Shared Childrearing Lower socio-economic women –Poor job and marriage prospects –May improve with age Have child at about 15 Over three generations –Mother: age 15 (reproductive) –Grandmother: age 35 (worker) –Great grandmother: age 50 (childcare)

35. Cost/Benefit Mother sacrifices resource acquisition (RA), gains personal reproductive fitness (PRF) Grandmother sacrifices PRF, gains inclusive fitness (IF), gains RA Great grandmother sacrifices RA and PRF, gains IF

36. Evidence: Trinidadian Study Only one reproductive female per household Daughters only become pregnant after their mother’s last child is 4+ years old Mother-daughter conflict –Greatest if daughter of childbearing age and mother still reproducing Correlational

37. Issues How is reproduction regulated? Multi-daughter families? Historical evidence? Cross-cultural? Correlational results –Interesting, but...