Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

An Integrated Perspective on the Southeast 17 Corridor Presenters: Lothar Wiwjorra, Senior Urban Designer Xia Zhang, Planner/Urban Designer Naveed Butt,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "An Integrated Perspective on the Southeast 17 Corridor Presenters: Lothar Wiwjorra, Senior Urban Designer Xia Zhang, Planner/Urban Designer Naveed Butt,"— Presentation transcript:

1 An Integrated Perspective on the Southeast 17 Corridor Presenters: Lothar Wiwjorra, Senior Urban Designer Xia Zhang, Planner/Urban Designer Naveed Butt, Manager/Design, Transportation Planning Neil Mckendrick, Manager/Transit Planning, Calgary Transit Land Use Planning & Policy Transportation Planning Calgary Transit The City of Calgary

2  Visionary Plan  Collaborative Process  Community Engagement  Implementation Framework Key Messages

3 “The heart and soul of multicultural East Calgary” Downtown Calgary and Inglewood Community to the West Regionally, Town of Chestermere to the East Plan Area

4 “International Avenue” Multi-cultural Characters Community Partners Poor Infrastructure Existing Conditions Area stats 3,000 residents and over 4,000 jobs build-out 30+ years: 13,000 more people and 9,000 more jobs

5 To Transition an established community with existing infrastructure into a transit-focused, liveable and distinctive mixed-use community:  Core of the Greater Forest Lawn Community  Multi-modal boulevard  Shopping avenue  Showcase for the cultural diversity of the area  Job hub and place to live  Safe place  Green and walkable Vision

6 Policy Alignment MDP (Municipal Development Plan)  Identifies the Plan Area as an Urban Corridor Typology with emphasis on a multi-modal boulevard fronted by a mix of higher intensity residential and business uses that foster a vibrant street environment.  Establishes a minimum intensity threshold of 200 jobs and population per gross developable hectare. CTP (Calgary Transportation Plan)  Identifies 17 Avenue SE as an Urban Boulevard where highest priority should be given to walking, cycling and transit  Where the “Complete Street” policies should be implemented.

7 5 Planning Overlays Character Zones Western Gateway Central Boulevard Eastern Parkway Overlay 1 Building Height Village-scale Medium-rise Medium-high High-rise Overlay 4 Public Realm Transit Hub Urban Plaza Pocket Park Street Park Linear Park Overlay 5 Overlay 2 Streetscape Roadway Roadside Building Interface Land Use Types Corridor Mixed-use General Mixed-use Special Mixed-use Main Street Retail Multi-Residential Overlay 3

8 5 Planning Overlays Character Zones Western Gateway Central Boulevard Eastern Parkway

9 5 Planning Overlays Streetscape Roadway Roadside Building Interface

10 5 Planning Overlays Land Use Types Corridor Mixed-use General Mixed-use Special Mixed-use Main Street Retail Multi-Residential

11 5 Planning Overlays Building Height Village-scale Medium-rise Medium-high High-rise

12 5 Planning Overlays Public Realm Transit Hub Urban Plaza Pocket Park Street Park Linear Park

13 Interdisciplinary Collaboration  Urban Design as a tool for effective public engagement and community buy-in  Urban Design as part of the interdisciplinary team  Urban Design concept triggers attention and inspires all to get things implemented over time This is definitely NOT our case!!!

14 Design Concept  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

15 Design Concept  Pedestrian priority  Mixed-use, medium/high density development  Retail frontages  Corner sites with active retail edges and corner plazas  Underground parking preferred at nodes  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

16 Design Concept  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development  Development Nodes  Main Street  Cultural Commercial Nodes  Open-air Malls  Urban Plazas  Pocket Parks  Linear Parks  Street Parks (known as “SPARKs”)  Local Landmarks

17 Design Concept  On-Street Parking  Street Pocket Parking  Green Surface Parking Lots  Underground Parking  Rooftop Parking  Concentrated Parking Structure  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

18 Design Concept  Green residential courtyards  Commercial courtyards  Double retail frontages  Combination of hard and soft landscaping  Ample sun access to the courtyards  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

19 Design Concept  Clear zones  Tree boulevards  On-street parking  On-street bike lanes  Curb cuts, curb extensions  Decorative pavement  Continuous “Street Wall” of 1-2 storey retail frontages  Corner recesses  Canopies, patios  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development Building Interface Zone Street Interface Zone P.L

20 Design Concept  Front setbacks of 0-3 metres  Larger setbacks for publicly accessible private open spaces  Design treatments for setback areas  Corner setbacks  A “street wall” envelope of 1 metre in depth  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

21 Design Concept  Minimum lot depth of 33m to accommodate efficient parking  For large unsubdivided blocks, new streets, lanes, amenity spaces and building blocks may be comprehensively considered  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

22 Design Concept  Public Green Space  Private amenity green space  Green parking lots  Double line of trees (public + private)  Enhancing Pedestrian Connections  Regulating Building Setbacks  Comprehensive Development of Large Blocks  Maximizing Green Space and Trees  Forming Development Nodes  Creating Special Places  Providing Multiple Parking Solutions  Encouraging Courtyard Development

23 Land Developability  Parking Layout Efficiency Parking Efficiency is expressed in square feet/metre of construction per parking space. Parking efficiency directly correlates with the construction cost per space. Build less structure per space and the cost per space drops.  PARKING EFFICIENCY MAKES A BIG DIFFERENCE – EXAMPLE 360 sf / space X 500 spaces X $45 / sf = $8,100,000 330 sf / space X 500 spaces X $45 / sf = $7,425,000 A difference of $675,000 or $1,350 per space!  Parking Layout Efficiency Lot Size (m)Number of Levels Number of Stalls Per Level Square Metres Per Stall 88m by 38m412427 Typical ranges of parking structure efficiencies are: Short Span Structural System = 330 to 390 Square Feet (30 to 36 Square Metre) per Space Long Span Structural System = 300 to 340 Square Feet (28-31 Square Metre) per Space Mixed Use Developments with retail, Residential and Parking can be as high as 400 + Square Feet per Space

24 Land Developability  Desirable Lot Widths and Depths Lot Width (m)Lot Depth (m)Number of Stalls Per 2 Split Levels Square Metres Per Stall 30333033 Built FormSetbacksNumber of Stalls Required Number of parking levels required FAR Lower 2 levels retail + Upper 6 levels residential Retail: 0m front & 3m rear & 0m side Residential: 3m front & 3m rear &3m side Retail 51 Residential: 36 35.75  Desirable Lot Depths should be minimum 33m (36-38m).  Desirable Lot Width should be minimum 30m or more up to the width of a block

25 Land Developability  Street Design/Delineate private space from public domain  Land Use Bylaw Setback Table Amendments  Corporate Properties Land Acquisition Strategy  Land Assembly along the corridor including moving lanes  Implications for Decision Making


Download ppt "An Integrated Perspective on the Southeast 17 Corridor Presenters: Lothar Wiwjorra, Senior Urban Designer Xia Zhang, Planner/Urban Designer Naveed Butt,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google