1. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Preliminary Heat Shield Design for nEDM

2. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Heat Shield Design Choices Meets Physics requirement for experiment Limits heat load to inner volumes Reliable design; no leaks or failures Manufacturability, Serviceability and Cost Support scheme that addresses movement Number of heat shield and temperatures LN2 shield or not Cool down requirements

3. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Layout

4. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Heat Shield Material Choices OFHC copper for outermost shield if it meets experiment requirements (MIT recommendation) Aluminum alloy for inner shields only if required Support scheme and materials that limit heat load Copy support designs from SRF community

5. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 OFHC Copper as heat shield Proven in most SRF cavities worldwide. Jlab, SNS, Cern, and Desy Does it meet Physics requirements ??? Braze with Sil-fos or other lower temperature alloy Lower CTE than Aluminum Alloys Very reliable Thermal Conductivity Copper vs. Aluminum At 40K, 5 times better ( 2000 W/ cm-K) At 80K, 2 times better ( 600 W/cm-K)

6. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Aluminum Heat Shields Thermal Conductivity Comparison

7. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Aluminum Heat Shields Material Comparison Aluminum 5083 Aluminum, Al 92.4 - 95.6 % Chromium, Cr 0.0500 - 0.250 % Copper, Cu <= 0.100 % Iron, Fe <= 0.400 % Magnesium, Mg 4.00 - 4.90 % Manganese, Mn 0.400 - 1.00 % Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si <= 0.400 % Titanium, Ti <= 0.150 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.250 % Aluminum 1100 Aluminum, Al >=99% Beryllium, Be <= 0.000800 % Copper, Cu <= 0.05 % Manganese, Mn <= 0.05% Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si <= 0.95 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.10 % Aluminum 6061 Aluminum, Al 95.8 - 98.6 % Chromium, Cr 0.0400 - 0.350 % Copper, Cu 0.150 - 0.400 % Iron, Fe <= 0.700 % Magnesium, Mg 0.800 - 1.20 % Manganese, Mn <= 0.150 % Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si 0.400 - 0.800 % Titanium, Ti <= 0.150 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.250 % Aluminum 3003 Aluminum, Al 96.7 - 99.0 % Copper, Cu 0.0500 - 0.200 % Iron, Fe <= 0.700 % Manganese, Mn 1.00 - 1.50 % Other, each <= 0.0500 % Other, total <= 0.150 % Silicon, Si <= 0.600 % Zinc, Zn <= 0.100 %

8. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Aluminum Fabrication Issues Need to narrow alloy choices for fabrication tests Try all in small 1 foot square tests Try different tubing attachment processes Clamp (Poor thermal contact) MIG or TIG weld (hard) Braze (vacuum braze) 1100 Aluminum best choice

9. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Heat Shield Temperature and Load

10. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Heat Shield Design Parameters Outer Cryostat - 6061 Aluminum, emissivity =.2 50K shield - OFHC Copper emissivity =.07(polished copper) 3 mm thick (.118) 22.2 mm tubing (1.0 mm thick) Initial design 40 Square meters 1000 kg. 4.5K shield - 1100 aluminum with brazed tubing 9.5 mm thick 400 kg.3-.5K Central Volume – Composite emissivity = 1.00 Vacuum better than 5 x 10e-5 torr Double Aluminized Mylar (DAM) 25 microns Polyester 75 micron spacer Emissivity =.035

11. Ernie Ihloff 21 May 08 Summary Use proven designs as guidance, Mostly Jlab Suggest use of OFHC copper outer shield Use 1100 Aluminum where necessary Tasks to complete concepual design Finish hand calculations (June 08) Not ready to release today Do FEA on heat transfer and structure (June-July) Work with Jan on supports (thermal and mechanical)