1. MULTICRITERIA DECISION WITHIN THE CSR (CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY) STRATEGY OF MACHINE INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES Ing. Katarína Dr ienik ová Prof. Ing. Peter Sakál, CSc. Moscow 20121

2. This article was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. LPP-0384-09: “Koncept HCS modelu 3E vs. koncept Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR).” The paper is also a part of submitted KEGA project No. 037STU-4/2012 “Implementation of the subject “Corporate Social Responsibility Entrepreneurship” into the study programme Industrial management in the second degree at MTF STU Trnava www.scss.sk2

3. „If companies believe they are in business to serve people, to help solve problems, to use and employ the ingenuity of their workers to improve the lives of people around them by learning from the nature that gives us life, we have a chance.“ Paul Hawken 3

4. I. Theory 1 Multicriteria aspect in decision-making process -AHP method 2 Concept of Corporate social responsibility (CSR) 3 Stakeholders 4 Pilot questionnaire II. Project of the thesis 1 The main goal of the thesis 2 Partial goals of the thesis 3 Working hypotheses 4 Structure of the thesis Content 4

5. I.Theory 5

6. 1.1 Multicriteria aspect in decision-making process Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) 6 To find an optimal solution of the problem that sets to more than one defined criteria is the working out of the multicriteria decision task. Analytic Hierarchy Process is the method that simplify and accelerate all process of decision making within complicated situations. It´s the method of decomposition of complicate unstructured situation to elementary components, that creates the hierarchy system. Through subjective evaluation in pairwise comparison, numerical values are given to individual components, which presents their relative importance.

7. 1.1 Analytický hierarchický proces (AHP)  Thomas. L. Saaty (60 th -70 th of 20 th century )  Expert Choice 7 1 Hierarchy 2 Priorities 3 Constistency

8. 1.1 Analytický hierarchický proces HIERARCHIA 8

9. 1.1 Analytický hierarchický proces PRIORITY 9

10. 1.2 The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility 1 Green Paper. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. 200110 „Corporate social responsibility is a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis “ 1.

11. 1.2 The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility CSR by ISO 26 000 (2010) 2 Zodpovednosť organizácie za vplyvy jej rozhodnutí a aktivít na spoločnosť a životné prostredie na základe transparentného a etického správania, ktoré:  prispieva k UR vrátane zdravia a blahobytu v spoločnosti,  zohľadňuje očakávania zúčastnených subjektov,  je v súlade s príslušnou legislatívou a medzinárodnými normami v oblasti správania,  je integrované do celej organizácie a uplatňované v jej vzťahoch. Kritika ISO 26 000 - ani v jednej svojej časti nerieši otázku obohacovania sa nadnárodných spoločností na úkor chudobnejších spoločenských vrstiev, resp. svojich zamestnancov. 2 STN ISO 26000. Usmernenie k spoločenskej zodpovednosti. Bratislava: SÚTN. 2011, 120 s.11

12. 1.3 Stakeholders 12 Those groups without whose support the organization would cease to exist (Stanford Research Institute, 1963) any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization objectives (Freeman, 1984) Any individual, group of individuals or an organization which can affect or be affected by company activities

13. 1.3 Stakeholders Stakeholders engagement to CSR activities 13 PLAN vplyv podniku v ekonomickej, sociálnej a environmentálnej oblasti DO realizácia podnikových záväzkov, rozvoj poslania SZP + implementácia CHECK –monitoring, reporting podnikového výkonu, výkonnostné indikátory, feedback, ACT hodnotenie a zlepšovanie činností, návrhy pre zlepšenie SZP aktivít podniku

14. 1.4 Pilot questionnaire 14 - In nearly 65% of companies the topic of CSR is discussed and nearly 90% of companies solves the problems of local community also. - Companies which strategy is based on SD/CSR say it's because of enhanced brand image and reputation, enhanced relations with employees and local community, effort to sustainable development. - Companies don't use any software in strategic decision making processes, the major decision criteria are following: quality, price, time, region, legislative, flexibility, level of risk, market opportunities,... - At least one third of asked companies use multicriteria optimization methods, they use mainly the method of pairwise comparison, method of decision-making matrix and proportionately index method.

15. 1.4 Pilot questionnaire 15 - More than one half of respondents stated they identify and classify stakeholders (mainly shareholders, employees, customers, competitors and managers). - Only 5 companies have also defined stakeholders goals. - Only 36% respondents stated that the importance of interests of various stakeholders isn't the same, the most important interests due to the business activities have shareholders, managers, customers, state and its institutions and competitors. - Only shareholders and managers are engaged to decision making. - Only 10 companies agree with the statement that stakeholders representative would be glad to be engaged to strategic decision making.

16. II. Project of the thesis 16

17. 17 2.1 The main goal of the thesis The main of my thesis on the basis of theoretical analysis and analysis and mapping of decision making processes in industrial companies to Návrh využitia metódy AHP (Analytický hierarchický proces) v stratégii SZP (spoločensky zodpovedného podnikania) priemyselných podnikov“.

18. 2.2 Partial goals of the thesis 18 1.On the basis of studying literature and other resources is to analyze theoretical outputs and to make complex survey of the following topics: stakeholders concept, concept of corporate social responsibility, multicriteria decision making specifically AHP method. 2.To analyze current state of CSR concept, multicriteria decision methods usage (AHP method) through the research in Slovak (Czech) industrial companies.

19. 19 3. To suggest decision criteria of key stakeholders for the need of the AHP method in context with CSR strategy. 4. To suggest usage of software Expert Choice in decision making process in a company. 5. To evaluate and to verify outputs in selected companies. 2.2 Partial goals of the thesis

20. 20 2.3 Working hypotheses 1.Majority of the companies by implementing CSR principles want to help to SD. 2.Companies don't perceive stakeholders as the part of the concept of corporate social responsibility. 3.Majority of Slovak industrial companies identify stakeholders but don't engage them to decision making. 4.Majority of industrial companies believe the interests of individual stakeholders are equally important to company.

21. 21 5.Companies that don't have effective communication with stakeholders can't engage representatives of key stakeholders to strategic decision making in effective way. 6.Companies that don't engage representatives of stakeholders to strategic decision making are not helpful in sustainable development. 7.Majority of Slovak industrial companies perceive their competitors as an important stakeholder. 2.3 Working hypotheses

22. 22 2.4 Structure of the thesis 1. chapter The main goal, partial goals, working hypotheses of the thesis. 2. chapter Methods used in the thesis.

23. 23 2.4 Methods used in the thesis - system approach - process approach - analysis and synthesis - comparisons - induction and deduction - AHP method - graphical methods - creative thinking methods - statistics - questionnaire

24. 24 4. chapter Analysis of current state of the stakeolders concept in conditions of Slovaka industrial comapanies. Jadrom tejto kapitoly budú výsledky získané prostredníctvom dotazníkového prieskumu v slovenských priemyselných podnikoch, zároveň budú podporené aj výsledkami získanými na základe nepriameho výskumu prostredníctvom dostupných informačných zdrojov. Zároveň v rámci tejto kapitoly potvrdím alebo vyvrátim stanovené pracovné hypotézy. 3. chapter Analysis of the theory related to the topic of stakeholders in response to CSR and multicriteria decision. 2.4 Structure of the thesis

25. 2.4 Tézy a štruktúra DDP 25 6. kapitola Daná kapitola bude zameraná na zosumarizovanie výstupov DDP vzhľadom k stanoveným cieľom a na zhodnotenie prínosov tejto práce nielen z teoretického, ale i praktického hľadiska. 5. kapitola Návrh kritérií rozhodovania kľúčových stakeholderov pre potrebu metódy AHP v kontexte so SZP a návrh využitia softvéru Expert Choice v stratégii SZP priemyselných podnikov

26. Thank You for Your Attention! katarina.drienikova@stuba.sk Student publlications : http://publview.stuba.sk/view_publ.php?dv=1&kd=-2&roh=- 1&a=80764&nz_typ=4http://publview.stuba.sk/view_publ.php?dv=1&kd=-2&roh=- 1&a=80764&nz_typ=4 26

27. Bibliography 1.513/1991 Zb. z., Zákon zo dňa 5. novembra 1991 Obchodný Zákonník. 2.HORÁK, R. Management, Brno: 2008 3.MÁCA, M., LEITNER B. Operačná analýza I. Deterministické metódy operačnej analýzy. 4.SEDLÁK, M. Manažment. Bratislava: IURA EDITION, s.r.o., 2001, 378 5.MAJTÁN, M., a kol. Manažment. Bratislava: SPRINT, 2005, 429 s., 6.SZABO, Ľ. Rozhodovanie v podnikovom manažmente. Bratislava : Vydavateľstvo EKONÓM. 2001, 149S., 7.SEKERA, B. Využitie exaktných metód v EMS priemyselných podnikov. 8.KOLČAVOVÁ, A. Kvantitativní metody v rozhodování. Studijní pomůcka pro distanční studium. 9.FOTR, J. a kol. Manažerské rozhodování : postupy, metody a nástroje. 10.RAMÍK, J. Analytický hierarchický proces (AHP) a jeho využití v malém a středním podnikání. 11.MLYNAROVIČ, V., HOZLÁR, E. Viackriteriálne rozhodovanie. Bratislava: EUBA. 1993, 12.OCELÍKOVÁ, E. Multikriteriálne rozhodovanie. Košice: ALFA, 2004. 87 13.on line. 14.on line 15.GRÜNING, R., KÜHN, R. Successful Decision- making. A systematic Approach to Complex Problems. 16.RAMÍK, J. Analytický hierarchický proces (AHP) a jeho možnosti uplatenění při hodnocení a podpoře rozhodování. 17.ROHÁČOVÁ, I., MARKOVÁ Z. Analýza metódy AHP a jej potenciálne využitie v logistike. 18.BHUSHAN, N., KANWAL, R. Strategic Decision Making 19.RAMÍK, J., PERZINA. Moderní metody hodnocení a rozhodování. 20.OLAWOYIN, R., OYEWOLE, S.A. An Exploration of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and its Utilization for Decision-Making in Energy Resource Management.

28. Bibliography 21.STEIGUER, J.E., DUBERSTEIN, J., LOPES, V. The Analytic Hierarchy Process as a Means for Integrated Watershed Management. 22.CHUDADA, M., TARABOVÁ, Z. Aplikácia AHP metódy pri hodnotení dopravného procesu. 23.A decision support system for supplier selection for Indian textile industry using analytic hierarchy process based on fuzzy simulation. 24.TAM, M.C.Y., TUMMALA, R. V. M. An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. 25.KUMAR, S., PARASHAR, N., HALEEM, A. Analytical Hierarchy Process Applied to Vendor Selection Problem: Small Scale, Medium Scale and Large Scale Industries. application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system. 26.CHAKRABORTY, T., GHOSH, T., K DAN, P. Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Heuristic Algorithm in Solving Vendor Selection Problem. 27. PENG, J. Research on the Optimization of Green Suppliers Based on AHP and GRA. 28.BABAK, D. R., TURAN, E. E. ERP System Selection by AHP Method: Case study from Turkey. 29.WEI, CH. CH., CHIEN, CH. F., WANG, M. J. J. An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. 30.CEBECI, U. Fuzzy AHP-based decision support system for selecting ERP systems in textile industry by using balanced scorecard. 31.DANNER, M., a kol. Integrating patients´views into health technology assessment: Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) as a method to elicit patient preferences. 32.GURUMURTHY, A., KODALI, R. An application of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Selection of a Methodology to Improve the Product Development Process. 33.GHAMSOGAR, M., HAGHYBY, M., MEHRDOUST, F., ARSHAD, N. Multicriteria Decision Making Based on Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in GIS for Tourism. 28

29. Bibliography 34. KRISHNAN, P. V., RAMNATH, V. B., PILLAI, M. K. Mathematical Model Using AHP to optimize the Organizational Financial Performance. 35.HOKEY, M. Evaluating the comparative service quality of supermarkets using the analytic hierarchy process. 36.XIANYONG, M. a kol. The optimization of regional lightning risk assessment based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. 37.Expert Choice – Vícekriteriální výběr z alternativ. Stručný prúvodce programem. 38.HOHNEN, P. Corporate Social Responsibility: An Implementation Guide for Business. 39.BRUNDTLAND, G. H. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987 40.NOVÁČEK, P. Udržitelný rozvoj. 41.CARROLL, A. B. Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct. 42.KAŠPAROVÁ, K. Vývoj CSR a její konkurenční koncepty. 43.Definícia zodpovedného podnikania. [online] 44.Green Paper. Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. 45.STN ISO 26000. Usmernenie k spoločenskej zodpovednosti. Bratislava: SÚTN. 2011, 120 s. 46.Zabezpečiť inteligentný, udržateľný a inkluzívny rast. Piata správa o hospodárskej, sociálnej a územnej súdržnosti. 47.CSR Europe. Enterprise 2020. 48.PRSKAVCOVÁ, M., MARŠÍKOVÁ, K., ŘEHOŘOVÁ, P., ZBRÁNKOVÁ, M. Spoločenská odpovědnost firem, lidský kapitál, rovné příležitosti a environmentální management s využitím zahraničních zkušeností. 49.PRACHAŘ, J., RYŠÁNEK, P., STRAKA, V., ZAJÍC, J. Spoločenská odpovědnost organizací (CSR) - Aplikace a hodnocení. 50.STEINEROVÁ, M., MAKOVSKI, D. Koncept CSR v praxi – průvodce odpovědným podnikáním. [online]. 51.ZELENÝ, J. Orientácia v oblasti systémového inžinierstva – základ úspešného environmentálneho inžiniera II. 29

30. Bibliography 52.PAVLÍK, M., BĚLČÍK, M. a kol. 2010. Společenská odpovědnost organizace. CSR v praxi a jak s ním dál. 53.TRNKOVÁ, J. Společenská odpovědnost firem. Kompletní průvodce tématem a závěry z průzkumu v ČR. 54.PORTER, M., KRAMER, M. Creating Shared Value. 55.SAKÁL, P. Strategický manažment v praxi manažéra. 56.FRIEDMAN, A. L., MILES, S. Stakeholders. Theory and Practice. 57.CHINYIO, E., OLOMAIYE, P. Construction Stakeholder Management. 58.ZELENÝ, J. Environmentálne manažérstvo a spoločenská zodpovednosť (organizácií). 59.MALAJI, A. D. Corporate Social Responsibility. 60.BUSSARD, A., MARČEK, E., MARKUŠ, M., BUNČÁK, M. Spoločenská zodpovednosť podnikania. Prehľad základných princípov a príkladov. 61. ZELENÝ, J. a kol. 2010. Environmentálna politika a manažérstvo organizácií. (6. diel, Environmentálna politika, manažérstvo a stakeholder manažment) 62.RECKLIES, D. 2001. online. [cit 2011-27-07]. http://www.themanager.org/resources/Stakeholder%20Management.htm http://www.themanager.org/resources/Stakeholder%20Management.htm 63.AA 1000 Stakeholder Engagement Standard. Accountability. London. 2011 30