Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byLeslie McNamara Modified over 11 years ago
1
The Neutron Alphabet Exploring the properties of fundamental interactions with cold neutrons Hartmut Abele
2
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 2 The Neutron Alphabet and Symmetries A: P-odd B: P-odd C: P-odd D: T-odd a N R: T-odd Electron Proton Neutrino Neutron Spin A B C
3
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 3 Experimental Groups, Neutron -Decay New experiments are greatly profiting from new sources & techniques Talks at NIST workshop from different groups in 2004:
4
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 4 Facilities Nico, Snow, Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 55 (2005) 55 2.0
5
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 5 Facilities Nico, Snow, Annu Rev Nucl Part Sci 55 (2005) 55
6
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 6 Nuclear and Particle Physics Neutrograph, Radio- and Tomography station
7
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 7 The PERKEO II Setup @ ILL 1. Polarizer 2. Spin Flipper 3. Spectrometer 4. Beam Stop M. Schumann 2006
8
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 8 The new Polarizer: 99.7 % Efficiency Kreuz, Soldner, Pekoutov, Nesvizhevsky, NIM 2006 ILL, HD A new geometry for Beam polarization Towards a perfectly polarized neutron beam Status 2002 Status 2004 98 % 100 % 96 % 100 % 90 % 95 % 94 % 96 % Spin up: reflected Spin down: absorbed Coherent nuclear (strong) and electronic (magnetic) scattering
9
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 9 Rf Spin flipper: 100% efficiency T. Soldner & A. Petoukhov Lab frame Rotating frame
10
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 10 Cold Neutrons For Correlation Coefficient A Measurements… High Flux: = 2 x 10 10 cm -2 s -1 Decay rate of 1 MHz / meter / sec Count rate: 10 6 s -1 Polarized to 98%: 2.5 x 10 5 s -1 Polarized to 99.7%: 1.4 x 10 5 s -1 Pulsed/unpulsed Spectrometer
11
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 11 Experiments
12
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 12 Characteristics of Experiments Using Magnetic Fields PERKEO III
13
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 13 B. Maerkisch, D. Dubbers, H.A. et al. Small systematic errors - background - edge effect - mirror effect PERKEO III 20 October 2006 – 11 April 2007 to beamstop
14
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 14 PERKEO III
15
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 15
16
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 16
17
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 17
18
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 18
19
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 19 Aim: Weak Magnetism form factor f 2 Neutron Decay Transition Matrix: Electron Asymmetry: f 2 Weak Magnetism Form Factor (SM prediction) 2 % additional E dependence of A PERKEO III can deliver the necessary statistics! Talk Marc Schumann at ILL
20
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 20 a Spect, Univ. MZ/TUM Proton spectroscopy
21
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 21 aSPECT is a retardation spectrometer for protons of free neutron decay aSPECT First impression
22
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 22 PNPI Experiment
23
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 23 aCORN Surface barrier detector
24
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 24
25
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 25 D-Coefficient emiT Trine
26
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 26 N ab Electron and neutrino momenta from electron energy cos e from proton momentum and electron energy using 4T 1T TOF between electron and proton
27
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 27 California Institute of Technology R. Carr, B. Filippone, J. Hsiao, R. McKeown, B. Plaster, B. Tipton, J. Yuan Institute Lau-Langevin P. Geltenbort Idaho State University R. Rios, E. Tatar Los Alamos National Laboratory J. Anaya, T. J. Bowles (co-spokesperson), T. Brun, M. Fowler, R. Hill, G. Hogan, T. Ito, K. Kirch, S. Lamoreaux, M. Makela, C. L. Morris, A. Pichlmaier, A. Saunders, S. Seestrom, P. Walstrom North Carolina State University/TUNL H. O. Back, L. Broussard, A. T. Holley, R. K. Jain, R. W. Pattie, K. Sabourov, A. R. Young (co- spokesperson), Y.-P. Xu Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute A. Aldushenkov, A. Kharitonov, I. Krasnoshekova, M. Lasakov, A. P. Serebrov, A. Vasiliev Tohoku University S. Kitagaki University of Kyoto M. Hino, T. Kawai, M. Utsuro University of Washington A. Garcia, S. Hoedl, D. Melconian, A. Sallaska, S. Sjue University of Winnipeg J. Martin Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University R. Mammei, M. Pitt, R. B. Vogelaar UCNA Collaboration
28
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 28 Results: A Electron Neutron Spin A
29
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 29 Results PERKEO II (2006) Spectra Dissertation D. Mund, 2006
30
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 30 Result for A Dissertation D. Mund, 2006
31
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 31 Beamrelated Background Collimation system < 0.15 s -1 Det. 0 Det. 1 Fitregion Electron- Spectrum Beamline BG
32
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 32 2002: result: A = -0.1189(8) = -1.2739(19) 2006: result: A = -0.1198(5) = -1.2762(13)
33
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 33 -1.19(2), PDG (1960) -1.25(2), PDG (1975) -1.261(4), PDG (1990) -1.2594(38), Gatchina (1997) -1.2660(40), M, ILL (1997) -1.2740(30), HD, ILL (1997) -1.2686(47), Gatchina, ILL (2001) -1.2739(19), HD, ILL (2002) -1.2762(13), HD, ILL (2006) a bit history: from neutron -decay Red: PDG 2006
34
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 34
35
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 35 Why ratio = g A / g V from Neutrons? Processes with the same Feynman-Diagram Slide from D. Dubbers
36
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 36 What about the lifetime? PDG: 885.7 ± 0.7 s Serebrov et al.: 878.5 ± 0.7 s Calculate SM Lifetime = 880.5 ± 1.5 s -vs 885.7 ± 0.7 s PDG 2006 -vs 878.5 ± 0.7 s Serebrov et al.
37
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 37 2. Correlation B in neutron -decay Neutrino Asymmetry n p e e Wd ~ (1 + B cos ) d Wd ~ (1 + B cos ) d Neutrino Neutron Spin B Electron Proton Neutrino Neutron Spin A B C
38
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 38 Electron and Proton in same hemisphere Electron and Proton in opposite hemispheres The Neutrino-Asymmetry B Electron Proton Neutron Spin Neutrino Electron Proton Neutrino Neutron Spin Systematically clean method: Integration over two hemispheres
39
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 39 Proton detector C foil on 25 keVScintillator Proton Proton detection: Measure electron energy Wait for proton Convert proton into electron signal Proton detection: Measure electron energy Wait for proton Convert proton into electron signal n-Spin
40
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 40 Proton electron spectrum Dissertation: J. Reich Dissertation J. Reich
41
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 41 Our Result: New mean Value: B mean = 0.9807(30) Result: Asymmetry B Thesis: M. Schumann 9 May 2007 Background B n Displacement B = 0.9802(50) only experiment that measures B in the same hemisphere result is virtually independent from detector calibration result limited by statistics and error in beam position relative to magn. field ( magnetic mirror effect)
42
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 42 Corrections and Errors: Asymmetry B Detector 1Detector 2 Corr. [%]Error [%]Corr. [%]Error [%] Polarization+0.30.1+0.30.1 Flipper-Efficiency0.1 Statistics1.220.36 Coincidence Measurement 0.29 0.07 0.18 0.04 Background0.100.08 Detector0.02 Systematics. Mirror Effect Displacement +0.44 0.10 0.05 0.32 +0.44 +0.10 0.05 0.32 Other 0.13 0.07 0.13 0.07 Other Coefficients0.07 Sum+0.221.28+0.530.52
43
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 43 2. Correlation C in neutron -decay n p e e Proton Neutron Spin C Wd ~ (1 + C cos ) d Wd ~ (1 + C cos ) d Electron Proton Neutron Spin A C
44
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 44 proton emission w.r.t. neutron spin: N, N (coincidence measurement with electrons) use electron spectra and integrate over electron energy E define Proton Asymmetry Problem: Energy threshold for electron detection PERKEO II ( 2004): C = 0.238(11) PhD M. Kreuz, J. Res. NIST. 110 (2005) Proton Asymmetry C Electron Proton Neutron Spin Neutrino Dissertation M. Schumann, 2007
45
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 45 Proton Asymmetry C, Results Thesis: M.Schumann 9 May 2007 1) 1)One-parameter fit 2) 2)Extrapolation 3) 3)Integration proton in spin direction proton against spin direction Our Result: first precision measurement error dominated by extrapolation and detector calibration C is better known than e correlation a agrees with SM value: new SM Tests possible: Q ++ Q + Q C = 0.2377(25) C SM = 0.2392(4)
46
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 46 The future
47
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 47 Aim: Spectra and angular distributions distortion-free on the level of 10 -4, 10x better than achieved today
48
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 48 n-guide: white, continuous n-beam n-velocity selector n-polarizer n-spin flipper n-guide n-chopper gap + dump n-guide + solenoid: field B 0 polarized, monochromatic n-pulse n + γ -beam stop solenoid, field B 1 solenoid, field B 2 p + + e window-frame p + + e beam A clean, bright and versatile source of neutron decay products: Perc
49
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 49 Expected count rates Cont. unpol: After mag. Barrier: Polarized to 98%: Pulsed: Pulsed polarized 99.7% T n ·I s =1.2 10 4 s 1. T n 'I s '=300s 1.
50
Hartmut Abele, University of Heidelberg 50 Table 1: Error budget of PERC in standard configuration. The numbering in this list is the same as in Sections 4.1 to 4.5. SOURCE OF ERRORCOMMENT SIZE OF CORRECT. SIZE OF ERROR: non-uniform n-beam for ΔΦ/Φ = 10 % over 1 cm width 2.5·104 5·10 5 other edge effects on e/p-window for worst case at max. energy 4·10 4 1·104 magn. mirror effect, contin's n- beam 1.4·102 2·104 magn. mirror effect, pulsed n- beam for ΔB/B = 10 % over 8 m length 5·10 5 <10 5 non-adiabatic e/p-transport 5·10 5 background from n-guide }is separately measurable 210 3 1·10 4 background from n-beam stop 2·10 4 1·10 5 backscattering off e/p-window 2·10 5 1·105 backscattering off e/p-beam dump 510 5 110 5 backscatt. off plastic scintillator }for worst case 210 3 4·10 4 ~ same with active e/p-beam dump 1·10 4 neutron polarisation present status 3·10 3 1·10 3 Dubbers, Baessler, Märkisch, Schumann, Soldner, Zimmer, H.A.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.