2. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin

3. Job-Order, Process, and Hybrid Cost Systems Chapter 12

4. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job-Order Costing Process Costing Job-Order Cost Systems  Product costs are traced to individual inventory items.  Products are manufactured to order.  Cost records must be maintained for each distinct product or job.

5. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Typical job-order cost applications:  Special-order printing  Building construction Also used in service industry  Hospitals  Law firms Job-Order Costing Process Costing Job-Order Cost Systems

6. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job-Order Costing Process Costing  Used for production of small, identical, low cost items.  Costs cannot be directly traced to each unit of product.  Costs are evenly distributed across total production by dividing total product cost by the number of units produced. Process Cost Systems

7. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Typical process cost applications:  Petrochemical refinery  Paint manufacturer  Paper mill Job-Order Costing Process Costing Process Cost Systems

8. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Schedule jobs Begin production Receive orders from customers Order materials Job-Order Cost Flow

9. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job-Order Cost Flow THE JOB Direct material Traced directly to each job Direct labor Traced directly to each job Manufacturing overhead (OH) Applied to each job using a predetermined rate

10. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Manufacturing Overhead Job No. 1 Job No. 2 Job No. 3 Charge direct material and direct labor costs to each job as work is performed. Direct Materials Direct Labor Job-Order Cost Flow

11. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Apply overhead to each job using a predeter- mined rate. Direct Materials Direct Labor Job No. 1 Job No. 2 Job No. 3 Manufacturing Overhead Job-Order Cost Flow

12. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System The primary document for tracking the costs associated with a given job is the job cost sheet. Let’s investigate

13. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

14. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Let’s see one A materials requisition form is used to authorize the use of materials on a job. Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

15. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Will E. Delite Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

16. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Will E. Delite Type, quantity, and total cost of material charged to job A-143. Cost of material is charged to job A-143. Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

17. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

18. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Workers use time tickets to record the time spent on each job. Let’s see one Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

19. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

20. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

21. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Apply manufacturing overhead to jobs using a predetermined overhead rate of $4 per direct labor hour (DLH). Let’s do it Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

22. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

23. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Let’s summarize the document flow we have been discussing in a job-order costing system. Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

24. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job Cost Sheets Materials Requisition Direct material s Indirect materials Manufacturing Overhead Account Materials used may be either direct or indirect. Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

25. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job Cost Sheets Employee Time Ticket Manufacturing Overhead Account Direct Labor Indirect Labor An employee’s time may be either direct or indirect. Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

26. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Employee Time Ticket Materials Requisition Indirect Material Indirect Labor Applied Overhead Manufacturing Overhead Account Other Actual OH Charges Job Cost Sheets Documentation in a Job-Order Cost System

27. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Let’s return to WoodCo and see what we will do if actual and applied overhead are not equal. Job-Order Cost Flow

28. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin SOLUTION Applied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labor Hours Applied Overhead = $4.00 per DLH × 170,000 DLH = $680,000 WoodCo’s actual overhead for the year was $650,000 for a total of 170,000 direct labor hours. How much total overhead was applied to WoodCo’s jobs during the year? Use WoodCo’s predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per direct labor hour. Job-Order Cost Flow

29. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin WoodCo’s actual overhead for the year was $650,000 for a total of 170,000 direct labor hours. How much total overhead was applied to WoodCo’s jobs during the year? Use WoodCo’s predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per direct labor hour. SOLUTION Applied Overhead = POHR × Actual Direct Labor Hours Applied Overhead = $4.00 per DLH × 170,000 DLH = $680,000 WoodCo has overapplied overhead for the year by $30,000. What will WoodCo do? Job-Order Cost Flow

30. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin $30,000 may be allocated to these accounts. $30,000 may be closed directly to cost of goods sold. WoodCo’s Method OR Work in Process Finished Goods Cost of Goods Sold Job-Order Cost Flow

31. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin WoodCo’s Mfg. Overhead Actual overhead costs $650,000 $30,000 overapplied WoodCo’s Cost of Goods Sold Unadjusted Balance $30,000 Adjusted Balance Overhead Applied to jobs $680,000 Job-Order Cost Flow

32. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin WoodCo’s Method Job-Order Cost Flow

33. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is a. $50,000 overapplied. b. $50,000 underapplied. c. $60,000 overapplied. d. $60,000 underapplied. Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is a. $50,000 overapplied. b. $50,000 underapplied. c. $60,000 overapplied. d. $60,000 underapplied. Job-Order Cost Flow

34. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is a. $50,000 overapplied. b. $50,000 underapplied. c. $60,000 overapplied. d. $60,000 underapplied. Tiger, Inc. had actual manufacturing overhead costs of $1,210,000 and a predetermined overhead rate of $4.00 per machine hour. Tiger, Inc. worked 290,000 machine hours during the period. Tiger’s manufacturing overhead is a. $50,000 overapplied. b. $50,000 underapplied. c. $60,000 overapplied. d. $60,000 underapplied. Overhead Applied $4.00 per hour × 290,000 hours = $1,160,000 Underapplied Overhead $1,210,000 - $1,160,000 = $50,000 Job-Order Cost Flow

35. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000. a. True b. False Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000. a. True b. False Job-Order Cost Flow

36. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000. a. True b. False Assume that Tiger’s overhead was $60,000 underapplied. This amount would result in an adjustment that would decrease cost of goods sold by $60,000. a. True b. False If overhead is underapplied, cost of goods sold is understated. The adjustment will increase cost of goods sold. Job-Order Cost Flow

37. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Let’s turn our attention to process cost systems. Process Costing

38. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Job-order costing  Costs accumulated by the job.  Work in process has a job-cost sheet for each job.  Many unique, high cost jobs.  Jobs built to customer order. Process costing  Costs accumulated by department or process.  Work in process has a production report for each batch of products.  A few identical, low cost products.  Units continuously produced for inventory. Comparison of Job-Order Costing and Process Costing

39. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Direct Material Finished Goods Cost of Goods Sold Direct Labor Manufacturing Overhead Jobs The work-in-process account consists of individual jobs in a job-order cost system. Differences Between Job-Order and Process Costing

40. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Direct Material Finished Goods Cost of Goods Sold Direct Labor Manufacturing Overhead Products Differences Between Job-Order and Process Costing The work-in-process account consists of batches of products in a process cost system.

41. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Equivalent Units: A Key Concept  Costs are accumulated for a period of time for products in work-in-process inventory.  Products in work-in-process inventory at the beginning and end of the period are only partially complete.  Equivalent units is a concept expressing these partially completed products as a smaller number of fully completed products.  Costs are accumulated for a period of time for products in work-in-process inventory.  Products in work-in-process inventory at the beginning and end of the period are only partially complete.  Equivalent units is a concept expressing these partially completed products as a smaller number of fully completed products.

42. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Two one-half completed products are equivalent to one completed product. + So, 10,000 units 70 percent complete are equivalent to 7,000 complete units. Equivalent Units: A Key Concept = 1

43. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period? a. 10,000 b. 11,500 c. 13,500 d. 15,000 Equivalent Units

44. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin For the current period, Jones started 15,000 units and completed 10,000 units, leaving 5,000 units in process 30 percent complete. How many equivalent units of production did Jones have for the period? a. 10,000 b. 11,500 c. 13,500 d. 15,000 10,000 units + (5,000 units ×.30) = 11,500 equivalent units Equivalent Units

45. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Calculating and Using Equivalent Units of Production To calculate the cost per equivalent unit for the period: Cost per equivalent unit = Costs for the period Equivalent units for the period

46. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin If Jones incurred $27,600 in production costs for the 11,500 equivalent units. What was Jones’s cost per equivalent unit for the period? a.$1.84 b.$2.40 c.$2.76 d.$2.90 Equivalent Units

47. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin If Jones incurred $27,600 in production costs for the 11,500 equivalent units. What was Jones’s cost per equivalent unit for the period? a.$1.84 b.$2.40 c.$2.76 d.$2.90 $27,600 ÷ 11,500 equivalent units = $2.40 per equivalent unit $27,600 ÷ 11,500 equivalent units = $2.40 per equivalent unit Equivalent Units

48. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Cost of Production Report  Computation of equivalent units.  Determination of cost per equivalent unit.  Allocation of total cost to goods transferred and ending WIP inventory.

49. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Equivalent Units of Production – Weighted-Average Method The weighted-average method... Makes no distinction between work done in the prior period and work done in the current period. Blends together units and costs from the prior period and the current period. The FIFO method is a more complex method and is rarely used in practice.

50. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin At this point, we need to look at an example to illustrate the departmental cost of production report. Cost of Production Report

51. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Process Costing Illustrated TigerCo makes toy tigers in three departments, Cutting, Stitching, and Stuffing. TigerCo uses the weighted-average cost procedure. Using the following information for the month of March, let’s prepare a cost of production report for the Cutting Department. TigerCo makes toy tigers in three departments, Cutting, Stitching, and Stuffing. TigerCo uses the weighted-average cost procedure. Using the following information for the month of March, let’s prepare a cost of production report for the Cutting Department.

52. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Work in Process, March 1, 30% complete: 20,000 units Cost of March 1 Work in Process: $ 22,000 Units started into production in June: 30,000 units Units completed and transferred out in June: 40,000 units Work in process, March 31, 40% complete: 10,000 units Costs incurred during March Materials $ 88,000 Labor 44,000 Overhead 132,000 Process Costing Illustrated TigerCo March Cutting Department Information

53. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Process Costing Illustrated Beginning inventory % is not used in weighted-average method. 40% of 10,000 units  Computation of Equivalent Units for March

54. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Production Report Example  Determination of Cost per Equivalent Unit for March.

55. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Production Report Example All costs accounted for  Allocation of Costs

56. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Hybrid Costing Hybrid costing employs some aspects of both job-order and process costing. Job-order Hybrid Costing Process Costing (Products produced in batches) Costing Labor and overhead costs assigned to batches as in process costing. Material Costs Charged to batches as in job-order costing.

57. © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2003 McGraw-Hill/Irwin I’m ready to process some leisure time. End of Chapter 12