1. Proposal for Synergistic Name Extraction from Historical Text Documents

2. Synergistic Name Extraction System operation – Shift burden to the system to the extent possible – Smoothly ranges from fully manual to fully automatic – Full control over level of automation Expectations – Immediate improvement (click to fill-in form ready for tech transfer) Accuracy can be as good as manual extraction (can guarantee) Time to extract reduced (likely significantly; potential reduction to 0) – Can use while still being studied and initially developed Green Interaction – Improves with use – Learns from observation and being corrected – Can be bootstrapped from scratch (needed for new language) Synergy: The interaction of two or more agents or forces so that their combined effect is greater than the sum of their individual effects.

3. Levels of Automation Manual – Type in all info of interest, both stated and inferred – Is the church’s current extraction system (except using DEG’s form-based interface) Manual minimal – Click-only form fill-in of stated information – Reasoner provides inferred information – Manual check all info of interest displayed correction option through manual editing Synergistic – Initial automatic form fill-in of info, both stated and inferred – Manual check and edit Automatic with auditing – Automatic form fill-in for a batch of names – Auditor samples and checks accuracy If accuracy deemed sufficient, accept If insufficient, redo synergistically Automatic without auditing – Fully automatic extraction and linking to the FamilySearch tree – Patrons notified when viewing information extracted automatically Patrons can view source and extraction & inference results Patrons can, indeed have the responsibility to, make corrections

4. Obituaries Project Demo with the synergistic system in mind Demo – 1998 system demo – Korean & French demo – FROntIER demo Includes extraction and inference caution: knowledge engineering not complete – Synergistic (mock-up of editing) – Manual click-only demo – NewsBank ?? Can we strike a deal now based on click-only? Should we first run a pilot experiment to provide numbers for decision making? – Fully manual to establish baseline – Manual-minimal to see if we’re enough better than the baseline to commit now – Do knowledge engineering for FROntIER obit extraction to see if we can either: » Develop and use automated synergistic system » Accept the accuracy levels to go fully automatic

5. Scanned Book Project Alter envisioned experiment (slightly) – New objective: investigate accuracy & cost wrt levels of automation – Only a slight change – should be acceptable to all Missionary task changes – Single form with fields for all info of interest – Two modes of operation (with different groups of missionaries) Type all Click-only (& let FROntIER get inferred info) Thesis experiment changes – No change to the experiment we’re planning – Additional follow-on experimental work Using the OntologyEditor, display and check results (as directed by low precision & recall) Edit by hand and rerun to get improved precision & recall results What we can learn by the slightly altered experiment – Type-in missionaries establish baseline – Click-only missionaries yield estimated results for manual-minimal level – Knowledge-engineering experiment: Estimates the cost and expertise of knowledge engineering (as originally planned) Establishes the potential for the fully automatic level (as originally planned) Roughly estimates accuracy & cost for the synergistic level (i.e., with added fix)