Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Stellar content of visibly obscured HII Regions Paul Crowther (Sheffield) James Furness (Sheffield), Pat Morris (CalTech), Peter Conti (JILA), Bob Blum.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Stellar content of visibly obscured HII Regions Paul Crowther (Sheffield) James Furness (Sheffield), Pat Morris (CalTech), Peter Conti (JILA), Bob Blum."— Presentation transcript:

1 Stellar content of visibly obscured HII Regions Paul Crowther (Sheffield) James Furness (Sheffield), Pat Morris (CalTech), Peter Conti (JILA), Bob Blum (NOAO), Augusto Damineli (IAG- USP), Cassio Barbosa (UNIVAP), Schuyler van Dyk (CalTech) W31 G23.96+0.1 5

2 Outline Direct & indirect stellar signatures in obscured compact HII regions Role of mid-IR fine structure lines G23.96+0.15 (UCHII) & W31 (giant HII) Calibration of UCHII regions? Relevance to starbursts

3 Direct stellar signatures If A V ~few, O star spectral types (T eff ) are obtained from blue visual spectra e.g. HeI 4471/HeII 4542 (Walborn 1971) If A V ~20-30 mag, near-IR spectral lines may be used instead, e.g. HeII 1.692  m/HeI 1.700  m (Hanson et al. 1998; Lenorzer et al. 2004) Conti & Alschuler 1971 Fit to dwarfs (  ) from Hanson et al. (2005) Conti & Frost 1977

4 Indirect stellar signatures For high A V, need to rely upon indirect methods using the ionized gas, e.g. thermal bremsstrahlung emission Radio continuum flux provides estimate of N(LyC), yet without any information on the hardness (T eff ) of the EUV radiation field. Reliable, unless dust absorbs a significant fraction of Lyman continuum photons, and/or free-free emission is not optically thin at observed. Mid-IR fine structure lines (e.g. [NeII] 12.8  m/[NeIII] 15.5  m) together with photo- ionization models (CLOUDY) should allow estimate of T eff for the ionizing star(s).

5 U T eff Problems? Predicted nebular fine- structure line ratios depend sensitively upon T eff and…. Martin-Hernandez et al. 2002 30kK 35kK 40kK Simon-Diaz & Stasinska 2008 Ne + S 2+ metallicity; stellar atmosphere models. n e or U (= N LyC /(4  R S 2 n e c) ); Metal rich Metal poor

6 Metallicity dependence Martin-Hernandez et al. 2002 Metal-poor; high ionization Metal-rich; low ionization GC Orion 30 Dor

7 G29.96-0.02 (UCHII) T eff =32-35kK (late O) from CMFGEN + nebular analysis of ([NeIII]/[NeII]; Martin- Hernandez et al. 2002; Morisset et al. 2002) T eff =41  2 kK (O4-5V) from an analysis of near-IR spectrum (Hanson et al. 2005 IAUS 227), feasible since A K ~2 mag Need more cases, but typically compact clusters lie within HII regions. Ionizing stars of UCHII regions rarely seen in near-IR.

8 G23.96+0.15 (UCHII) One exception is G23.96+0.15 (UCHII). 2’=3pc@5kpc VLT ISAAC spectroscopy reveals T~38  1 kK (O7.5V) confirming subtype from low res data (Hanson et al. 2002). Hanson et al. 2005 (atlas) 2MASS JHK 10” (0.25 pc @ 5kpc) ISAAC 2.2  m

9 Stellar Cluster W31 (GHII) K-band spectroscopy from Blum, Damineli & Conti (2001) revealed a young stellar cluster within W31 (G10.2- 0.3) at d~3kpc, comprising “naked” O stars & massive YSO’s Ghosh et al. (1989) also identify a number of UCHII regions. 1 arcmin (1 pc @ 3.3 kpc)

10 Near- & mid-IR spectroscopy Refined spectral types for 5 W31 cluster members from VLT/ISAAC O3-5.5V for 4 “naked” O stars (~30-55 M o ) with  ~1.5 Myr, plus O6V for a massive YSO (source 26). Spitzer/IRS reveals highest [NeIII]/[NeII] ratios for “naked” stars (highest mass, quickest to shed dust cocoon?) Greatly expanded sample with mid-IR nebular plus near-IR stellar datasets.

11 Mid-IR diagnostics U dependence separated from T eff using U T eff Significant differences between empirical mid-IR line ratios & metal- rich CMFGEN + CLOUDY models predictions If n e known,

12 Calibration of UCHII regions? Ground-based mid- IR spectroscopy limited to [SIV]/[NeII]. In this case, systematic offset between observation and prediction. For metal-rich HII regions calibration may be possible.

13 G49.49-0.37 (W51A) N-band imaging of ~30 UCHII regions often reveals multiple (dust) continuum sources Spectral types of individual stars may be extracted from [SIV]/[NeII] ratios First attempted in this context by Okamoto et al. (2003) for G70.29+1.60 8 arcsec = 0.2 pc (@ 5.5kpc) [SIV]/[NeII]~0.1 Gemini Michelle IR S 2E W51d1 OKYM2 IRS2W [SIV]/[NeII]~0.5

14 Extragalactic HII regions Relevant to interpretation of mid-IR data for starburst regions e.g. IC4662 (Gilbert & Vacca 2008)

15 Starbursts [NeIII]/[NeII] ratio is used to deduce stellar content/IMF/age of starbursts (e.g. Thornley et al. 2000). Essential to ensure photoionization models are well calibrated.

16 Summary In principle, ratios of mid-IR fine structure lines offer means of establishing Sp Types (T eff ) of ionizing stars in obscured HII regions; We provide an increased sample of HII regions, associated with individual O stars, for which both mid-IR nebular diagnostics & spectral types are known (G23.96+0.15, W31); In practice, disappointing agreement between observed [NeII-III], [SIII-IV] ratios & expectations from photo-ionization models; Nevertheless, [SIV]/[NeII] ratio does have the potential to serve as a diagnostic for HII regions within the inner Milky Way.

17 Mid-IR diagnostics Simon-Diaz & Stasinska (2008) appeared to (nearly) resolve stellar/nebular discrepancy for G29.96- 0.02 Unfortunately agreement is lost for solar grid, once U has its usual definition N LyC /(4  R S 2 n e c). 35 40 45 -3 -2 U=N LyC /(4  R 0 2 n e c).

18 From comparison with ISO observations of HII regions, Morisset et al (2004) concluded: -CoStar too hard at high energies (approximate treatment of blanketing) -TLUSTY & Kurucz too soft at high energies (due to neglect of stellar winds) -CMFGEN & WM-basic in “reasonable agreement” with observations (although they fared no better than a blackbody! SED) Stellar atmosphere models?


Download ppt "Stellar content of visibly obscured HII Regions Paul Crowther (Sheffield) James Furness (Sheffield), Pat Morris (CalTech), Peter Conti (JILA), Bob Blum."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google