1. Classroom-based Training Feedback TECM 5180 Dr. Lam

2. Needs Assessment Area for Improvement:Covered in:Resources Provided: Not asking specific enough questions to complete problem, discrepancy, or innovation model Week 2 Piskurich Chapters 3 and 4 Needs assessment document outline Three examples of needs assessments Annotated instructional design case study

3. Design Area for Improvement:Covered in:Resources Provided: Incomplete or no clear evidence of a task analysis Week 3 and Week 6 Smith and Ragan Ch. 5 Design document specifications Design document tutorial Summary of learning types Annotated Instructional Design Case Study Learning objectives only provided for first-level objectives Week 3 and Week 6 “Practical overview of learning objectives” “Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy” Piskurich Ch. 5 See above No clear assignment of learning types to each piece of the task analysis Week 3 and Week 6 Smith and Ragan Ch. 5 See above Learning activities not clearly based on the learning type. Week 3 and Week 6 “Overview of Gagne’s theory of learning” “Rote vs. Meaningful Learning” “Dick and Carey’s Instructional Strategy” See above Events of learning not clearly represented or well-thought out Week 3 and Week 6 “Dick and Carey’s Instructional Strategy” See above

4. Course Deliverables Area for Improvement:Covered in:Resources Provided: Participant’s guide didn’t promote enough interaction. Week 5 “Dick and Cary’s Instructional Strategy” “Selecting instructional Media” Sample documents Assessments weren’t always appropriate for learning type Week 6 “Assessment instruments” Piskurich pp. 159-181 http://www.utexas.edu/ academic/ctl/assessment /iar/students/plan/meth od/exams.php