1. European Quality Assurance in Higher Education after the London ministerial meeting: moving towards 2010 (and beyond) Sofia, 9 November Emmi Helle Secretary General ENQA

2. ENQA
network in 2000; association in 2004
umbrella NGO for European QA agencies
35 Full members, 10 Candidate members
associates and affiliates since 2006: 12+2
structure: Board, General Assembly, Secretariat
from Helsinki to Brussels in 2008
external reviews of ENQA member agencies by 2010
co-operation within E4 (EUA, ESU, EURASHE)

3. European standards and guidelines (ESG)
drafted by ENQA in consultation with EUA, EURASHE and ESIB
approved by the Bologna ministerial conference in Bergen in 2005
consist of
ESG for internal QA within HEIs (Part 1)
ESG for the external QA of higher education (Part 2)
ESG for external QA agencies (Part 3)

4. London Communiqué: extracts on QA (1)
[…ESG] have been a powerful driver of change in
relation to QA. All countries have started to
implement them and some have made substantial
progress. External QA in particular is much better
developed than before […] student involvement at
all levels has increased […] Since the main
responsibility for quality lies with HEIs, they
should continue to develop their systems of QA. We
acknowledge the progress made with regard to
mutual recognition of accreditation and quality
assurance decisions, and encourage continued
international cooperation amongst QA agencies.

5. London Communiqué: extracts on QA (2)
The first European Quality Assurance
Forum, jointly organised by EUA, ENQA,
EURASHE and ESU/ESIB (the E4 Group) in
2006 provided an opportunity to discuss
European developments in QA. We
encourage the four organisations to
continue to organise European QA Fora
on an annual basis, to facilitate the
sharing of good practice and ensure that
quality in the EHEA continues to improve.

6. London Communiqué: extracts on QA (3)
We thank the E4 Group for responding to our request to further
develop the practicalities of setting up a Register of
European Higher Education Quality Assurance Agencies.
The purpose […] is […] open access to objective information
about trustworthy QA agencies that are working in line with
the ESG. It will therefore enhance confidence in higher
education […] and facilitate the mutual recognition of QA
and accreditation decisions. We welcome the establishment of a
register by the E4 group […] The register will be voluntary,
self-financing, independent and transparent. Applications
for inclusion on the register should be evaluated on the basis of
substantial compliance with the ESG, evidenced through an
independent review process endorsed by national
authorities […] We ask the E4 group to report progress to us
regularly through BFUG, and to ensure that after two years of
operation, the register is evaluated externally […]

7. The Register – progress to date
after the ministerial endorsement, a Register working group set up by E4
Project Manager appointed, with EC funding
name and acronym: European Quality Assurance Register in Higher Education, EQAR
website under construction, will be launched in December 2007:
will be founded as an association under Belgian Law -> statutes and structure need to conform with that law
founding GA meeting on 4 March 2008
envisaged first applications in June 2008

8. EQAR in practise (1) Register Committee
11 members in their individual capacity
5 government observers
Appeals Committee
3 members
Approval based on nominations
Election
General Assembly
Founding Members E4 Group
Social Partners BE and EI
Governmental Members EHEA Governments, CoE, CEPES
Executive Board: 4 members (elected on proposal of the E4)
Secretariat: Director (1 FTE) + Administrative assistant (0.5 FTE)

9. EQAR in practise (2): membership
non-governmental members:
founding members (the E4 organisations)
social partner members (EI, BE)
governmental members
all parties to the European Cultural Convention
intergovernmental organisations that are consultative members of the BFUG (CoE, UNESCO-CEPES)
members not to be confused with the agencies listed in the Register
members pay annual membership fees, agencies pay fees of application and annual fees (to stay listed)

10. EQAR in practise (3)

11. EQAR in practise (4)
promotes student mobility by providing a basis for the increase of trust among the HEIs;
reduces opportunities for “accreditation mills” to gain credibility;
provides a basis for governments to authorise HEIs to choose any agency from the Register, if that is compatible with national arrangements;
provides a means for the HEIs to choose between different agencies, if that is compatible with national arrangements;
serves as an instrument to improve the quality of the quality assurance agencies and to promote mutual trust among them.

12. EQAR in practise (5) – how will it look like?
will be an easily accessible, publicly available, web-based information tool consisting in a list of QA agencies operating in Europe
available at
contains basic information, such as:
agency’s name and contact information
QA services provided by the agency
ENQA membership
country where the agency is established
countries in which the agency operates

13. Relationship between ENQA and EQAR
EQAR will be an information tool on trustworthy agencies, a list on the internet
will not organise events, publish reports, share good practise or conduct (research) projects
ENQA is an umbrella organisation for QA agencies, a membership organisation
organises events, publishes reports, shares good practise, conducts different (research) projects
represents the interests of its members in the EHEA and internationally

14. Relationship between ENQA and EQAR
ENQA will be a (founding) member of the EQAR association
ENQA will nominate two representatives for the Register Committee
ENQA will nominate one of the four members of the Executive Board and thereby be involved in the day-to-day management of the EQAR

15. Challenges related with EQAR
funding and sustainable financial strategy? Self-financing?
putting the ESG in practise?
duplication with ENQA membership?
different decisions from ENQA?
complexity of structure?

16. Bologna Process: priorities for 2009
mobility
social dimension
data collection
employability
EHEA in a global context
stocktaking
degree system and employability of graduates
recognition of degrees and study periods
implementation of all aspects of QA in line with the ESG
national qualifications frameworks, learning outcomes and credits, lifelong learning, and the recognition of prior learning

17. Bologna Process: 2010 and beyond
will go on in some format: BFUG will report to the Leuven/La Neuve ministerial meeting in 2009 on the possible further development and support structures
possible reformulation of the EHEA vision?
an independent assessment in 2010 of the Bologna Process

18. Feedback from members at the Oslo GA – ENQA priorities for short term
strengthen the internal communication within ENQA;
clarify the relationship between ENQA and EQAR;
create standards, supplementary to the ESG, on transnational themes such as the quality of e-learning;
play a major role in the Bologna Process as an overarching “political” organisation providing frameworks for the evolution of QA agencies;
continue to be open to all agencies and, as a learning organisation, enable agencies to develop continuously;
develop a lead role in representing the interests of its member agencies at European and international levels.

19. European quality assurance agency? European think-thank?
ENQA in the future
European quality assurance agency?
European think-thank?
inclusiveness / exclusiveness?
compact association or going back to loose network?
the ‘political’ role after the establishment of EQAR?
the future of the ESG?
wider international role for ENQA?
radical rethinking of quality assurance?