Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMichael Lee Modified over 9 years ago
1
LOGO Sequential versus triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-lable, randomised trial 杨 天 1311210631 Epidemiology and Biostatistics March 31, 2014
2
LOGO Contents Introduction Methods Procedures Statistical analysis Results Discussion
3
LOGO Introduction Sequential treatment a proton-pump inhibitor and amoxicillin for the first 5 days ; proton-pump inhibitor plus clarithroycin and metronidazole (or tinidazole) for another 5 days. Triple therapy 7 days or 10 days
4
LOGO Concerns Susceptibility tests; Generalised to other countries; Few studies, contradictory results, reasons unknown; The effectiveness of extending the duration of sequential treatment from 10 days to 14 days.
5
LOGO Concerns Re-treat the patients who fail sequential treatment; To choose the best regimen on the basis of the prevalence of antibiotic resistance in different geographical areas;
6
LOGO A randomised controlled trial The efficacy of sequential treatment for 10 days and 14 days with triple therapy for 14 daysin firstline treatment; Eradication rates; The efficacy of the modified sequential treatment; The efficacies of three regimens in the sensitivity analysis.
7
LOGO Methods : Study design and participants Gastroenterology clinics in six medical centres in Taiwan. Aged 20 years or older; Documented H pylory infection.
8
LOGO The criteria of exclusion of the study Previous eradication treatment for H pylory; History of gastrectomy; Contraindication or previous allergic reactions to the study drugs; Pregnant or lactating women Use of antibiotics within the previous 4 weeks; Severe concurrent diseases or malignancy.
9
LOGO Randomisation and masking A permuted block randomisation; An independent research assistant; The computerised random number sequence; An opaque envelop All investigators were masked. T-14 lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg for 14 days. S-10 lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 5 days, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg for another 5 days. S-14 lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 7 days, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg for another 7 days. Procedures for the first-line treatment.
10
LOGO Procedures Before enrolment Post-treatment H pylori status Patients with positive results: rapid urease test, histology, culture, and serology. Asymptomatic individuals who underwent screening: positive C urea breath test. TC urea breath test (C-UBT): stop treatment with proton-pump inhibitor and histamin-2 blocker for at least 2 weeks. Primary endpoint: H pylori eradication rates in first-line treatment. Secondary endpoints: the frequency of adverse events and compliance.
11
LOGO Figure 1. Trial profile ITT=intention-to-treat. PP=per-protocol. MS-14=modified sequential treatment containing levofloxacin. S-10=sequential treatment for 10 days. S-14=sequential treatment for 14 days. T14=triple therapy for 14 days.
12
LOGO Statistical analysis Sample size: 300 individuals in each group Power: 90% Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test Student's t test Multiple logistic regression analyses A decision model Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
13
LOGO Table1: Baseline characteristics
14
LOGO Table 2: Helicobacter pylory eradication in first-line and second-line treatments
15
LOGO Figure 2: Efficacies of first-line and second-line Helicobacter pylory treatments
16
LOGO Table 3: Adverse events in first-line and second-line treatment
17
LOGO Table 4: Factors affecting eradication first-line treatment
18
LOGO Appendix
19
LOGO
20
Discussion: Novel findings Sequential treatment for 14 days is better than triple therapy for 14 days as first-line treatment; Clarithromycin resistance decreased the efficacies of both sequential and triple treatments; Metronidazole resistance decreased the efficacy of sequential treatment;
21
LOGO Novel findings H pylory eradication rates are not affected by host CYP2C19 polymorphisms nor bacterial virulence factors; Modified sequential treatment containing levofloxacin is effective for patients who failed from either sequential or triple therapy.
22
LOGO Strengths Large sample size; Comparison of three treatment groups; Factors that might affect treatment efficacy; The efficacy of their recue treatment; The sensitivity analysis according to the prevalence of antibiotic resistance.
23
LOGO Limitations Selection bias; The difference in the overall efficacy after first-line and second- line treatment; The precision in the efficacy estimate of MS-14 was constrained;
24
LOGO Limitations The complexity of sequential treatment might reduce patients' compliance outside clinical trials; The allocation concealment; The differences between S-14 and S-10 and between S-10 and T-14 were not statisticaly significant.
25
LOGO Summary All the findings lend support to the use of sequential treatment as the standard first-line treatment for H pylori infection. They also lend support to the idea that the best eradication regimen should be chosen on the basis of the prevalence of antibiotic- resistant H pylori in the region.
26
LOGO
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.