1. Resource Slides “Future Talk” with County Councils Extension to Communities

2. Governor’s Strategic Planning Council 2010 Goals 1.Iowa Welcomes a Diverse Population 2.Electronically Connected to Each Other and the World 3.Life Sciences Capital of the World 4.A Great Place to Visit and to Live 5.Higher Wages and Income 6.Education for a Lifetime 7.Protecting and Preserving Our Natural Resources 8.Smart Government Works for Iowans

4. Prepared by Census Services Iowa State University Extension to Communities with support from Iowa PROfiles and Department of Economics ISU Census Services Trends in Montgomery County April 2001

5. 1900195020002020 0 5 10 15 20 Thousands Projected Population Montgomery County ISU Census Services Source: Woods & Poole Economics, Inc., 2000

6. Population Coburg 19001020304050607080902000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 ISU Census Services

7. Population Elliott 19001020304050607080902000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 ISU Census Services

8. Population Grant 19001020304050607080902000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 ISU Census Services

9. Population Red Oak 19001020304050607080902000 0 2 4 6 8 10 Thousands ISU Census Services

10. Population Stanton 19001020304050607080902000 0 200 400 600 800 1000 ISU Census Services

11. Population Villisca 19001020304050607080902000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 ISU Census Services

12. Births and Deaths Montgomery County 1940195019601970198019902000 0 100 200 300 400 Births Deaths ISU Census Services

13. Natural Change* by Decade Montgomery County 1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s 0 1 2 3 -2 -3 Thousands ISU Census Services * Births minus deaths

14. Net Migration by Decade Montgomery County 1940s1950s1960s1970s1980s1990s 0 1 2 3 -2 -3 Thousands ISU Census Services

15. Certified and Projected K-12 Enrollment* Montgomery County 199519971999200020022004 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 2400 Certified Projected * Includes only public schools ISU Census Services

16. 1978808284868890929496982000 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% *Minority includes Hispanic, Black, Asian American, and American Indian students State Montgomery County Percent Minority* K - 12 Students ISU Census Services

17. 1970197519801985199019952000 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 Thousands State Montgomery County Per Capita Income ISU Census Services

18. 1970197519801985199019952000 $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 Thousands State Montgomery County Adjusted Per Capita Income (1998 dollars) ISU Census Services

19. 198919911993199519971999 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Based on October public and nonpublic school enrollment State Montgomery County Percent of Students Receiving Free or Reduced-Price School Meals ISU Census Services

20. Population Under 5 and 75 or Older Montgomery County 1940195019601970198019902000 0 500 1000 1500 2000 ISU Census Services Under 5 75 or older

21. Population 2000 Montgomery County 85+ 80 - 84 75 - 79 70 - 74 65 - 69 60 - 64 55 - 69 50 - 54 45 - 49 40 - 44 35 - 39 30 - 34 25 - 29 20 - 24 15 - 19 10 - 14 5 - 9 0 - 4 0%1%2%3%4%5%6%0%1%2%3%4%5%6% Male Female ISU Census Services

22. Population 1980 Montgomery County 85+ 80 - 84 75 - 79 70 - 74 65 - 69 60 - 64 55 - 69 50 - 54 45 - 49 40 - 44 35 - 39 30 - 34 25 - 29 20 - 24 15 - 19 10 - 14 5 - 9 0 - 4 0%1%2%3%4%5%6%0%1%2%3%4%5%6% Male Female ISU Census Services

23. Surplus or Leakage of Retail Sales An indicator of the economic health of the county’s retail sector A positive number means there is a net inflow (surplus) of retail sales into the county A negative number means there is a net outflow of retail sales (leakage)

24. 1980 Iowa County Retail Sales Surplus or Leakage Counties with surplus (n=25) Counties with leakage (n=74) Note: Rounded to nearest whole number.

25. 2000 Iowa County Retail Sales Surplus or Leakage Counties with surplus (n=18) Counties with leakage (n=81) Note: Rounded to nearest whole number.

26. Montgomery County Surplus or Leakage for Total Taxable Retail Sales

27. Montgomery County Surplus or Leakage by Merchandise Category, 2000 NA means data not available.

28. Net outflow: payroll exceeds reported earnings (i.e., non-county residents are commuting into the county for work). Net inflow: reported earnings exceeds reported payroll (i.e., county residents commuting out of county for work). “Balanced”: earnings and reported payroll relatively equal.

29. Net Earnings, 1999 Map created by the Rural Data Project Data Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis Net outflow "Balanced" Net inflow