Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byArabella Chapman Modified over 9 years ago
1
1 Long-Term Memory Introduction STM versus LTM Episodic Memory Semantic Memory Procedural Memory Encoding in Long-Term Memory Depth of Processing (or Levels of Processing) Self Reference Effect Encoding Specificity Principle Emotions, Moods, and Memory
2
2 Long-Term Memory 2 Retrieval in Long-Term Memory Explicit versus Implicit Memory Very Long-Term Memory Expertise Amnesia Autobiographical Memory Flashbulb Memories Schemas & Autobiographical Memory Source Monitoring Eyewitness Testimony
3
3 Tulving’s Memory Model Episodic Semantic Procedural
4
4 Encoding in LTM Levels (depth) of processing Self-Reference Effect Encoding Specificity Principle Emotion and Memory Mood and Memory
5
5 Levels of Processing Framework Craik & Lockhart (1972) Type of Processing Physical Processing > shallow Meaningful Processing > deep Trace byproduct of processing Deeper processing leads to more durable traces
6
6 Levels of Processing Demonstration
7
7 Levels of Processing Demo Picture
8
8 Maintenance Rehearsal vs. Elaborative Rehearsal
9
9 Research on LOP and Similar Themes Tulving (1975) Generation Effect (1978) e.g.lightd_ _ k (generation) vs. lightdark (read) Faces - e.g. Sporer (1991)
10
10 Judge how wide the person’s nose is:
11
11 Picture of Face with Narrow Nose
12
12 Picture of Face with Wide Nose
13
13 Judge how honest this face is
14
14 Explanations Distinctiveness Elaboration
15
15 Self-Reference Effect Rogers, Kuiper, & Kirker (1997) Process list of words: Physical characteristics Acoustic characteristics Semantic characteristics Self - (reference) Robust effect Symons & Johnson (1997) Meta-analysis Explanations
16
16 Rogers, et. al., 1977
17
17 Revisions to LOP Moscovitch & Craik (1975) -Encoding Specificity Principle Bransford & Franks - Transfer Appropriate Processing
18
18 Effects of Context Geiselman & Glenny (1977) Outshining hypothesis
19
19 Effects of Context Baddeley - scuba diving Remembering names - faces as contextual cues Practical Application - imaginary reinstatement
20
20 Geiselman & Glenny (1997) Encoding (Imagined) female voicemale voice Test (Actual Speaker) malefemalemalefemale
21
21 Geiselman & Glenny Results
22
22 How can we use the Encoding Specificity Principle to improve memory for events?
23
23 Mood & Memory Memory for items differing in emotion Pollyanna Principle Mood Congruence - individual differences studies - experimental manipulation of moods Mood-State Dependence - Claudia Ucros (1989) - meta-analysis - other variables
24
24 Study each of the words that appear PictureCommerceMotionVillageVesselWindowNumberReindeer Custom Fellow Advice Dozen Flower Kitchen Bookstore
25
25 Explicit Memory Measures
26
26 Implicit Memory Measures Picture, Commerce, Motion, Village,Vessel,Window, Number, Reindeer, Custom, Fellow, Advice, Dozen, Flower, Kitchen, Bookstore
27
27 Explicit vs Implicit Measures of Memory Explicit memory measures: recall recognition Implicit memory measures: Word fragment completion Stem completion Repetition priming Role of conscious, deliberate recollection
28
28 The Critical Distinction Explicit memory tasks require conscious, deliberate recollection of previous experiences Implicit memory tasks do not require conscious recollection of previous events e.g., b_ _ k
29
29 Research with Amnesics Warrington & Weiskrantz (1970) Tasks explicit - recognition, recall implicit - mutilated word guessing - stem completion - stem completion e.g. st_ _ _ e.g. st_ _ _ Replicated Dissociation
30
30 Dissociation A variable has an effect on one type of test, but little or no effect on another type of test A variable has one type of effect if measured by Test A, but a different effect if measured by Test B
31
31 Research with Normal Adults Levels of processing and the implicit / explicit distincion Picture Superiority Effect Current Status - explanations - applications
32
32 Levels of Processing: Explicit/Implict Tests truck Semantic (pleasant vs unpleasant) Physical, perceptual Task (# syllables or Upper/lower case?) Higher recall, recognition * ___ Higher--or at least equal performance* ___Implicit Memory Test (e.g. t_u_k) Explicit Memory Test
33
33 versus. Elephant Picture Superiority Effect 1. 1.Subjects view a series of pictures or a series of words 2. 2.Subjects recall stimuli by writing down names of items -- recall of pictures is higher than recall of words.
34
34 Weldon & Roediger (1987)
35
35 Weldon & Roediger Graph (1987)
36
36 Explanations No agreed-upon explanation Context & encoding specificity Multiple memory systems e.g. Tulving Neuroscience account
37
37 Applications of implicit / explicit memory research to real life problems?
38
38 Ad for Experimental Psychologists
39
39 Expertise Influence on LTM Definition - consistent superior performance - deliberate practice - deliberate practice - at least 10 years - at least 10 years Domain specific 10-year rule
40
40 Context-Specific Nature of Expertise Skilled memory effect Chess -De Groot -Chase & Simon (1973): 5 second task typical vs. random positions Similar effects in many domains: -basketball-x-rays -circuit diagrams, etc. SF (digits only)
41
41 An Expert Waiter - JC Ericsson (1985) J.C. - 20 tops Comparison of J.C. to college students Critical difference = memory strategies and knowledge Follow-up study (Crutcher, Ericsson, & Bauder)
42
42 Expert Waiters Study: A Trial
43
43 JC’s Strategies
44
44 Characteristics of Experts
45
45 Autobiographical Memory Memory for events and issues related to yourself Naturally occurring events Rapidly growing interest Wide variety of topics High ecological validity
46
46 Topics Flashbulb Memories Brown & Kulik (1977) High level of surprise High level of emotional arousal Recent Research (Weaver, 1993) Schemas & Autobiographical Memory Generalized, abstract knowledge structures Memory for common, ordinary events Variable instantiation False memories Consistency bias Repisodic Memory
47
47 Topics Source Monitoring Origin of a memory Actual versus imagined action Marsh & Colleagues (1997) Henkel & Colleagues (2000)
48
48 Flashbulb Memory Demonstration
49
49 Schematization of Memory
50
50 Eyewitness Testimony The ‘gentleman bandit’ (1979) Identifying faces Recognition accuracy Time and attention Reintz, et al. (1994, p 45) Length of retention interval Intervening info Misleading post-event info
51
51 Misinformation Effect Caused by misleading information given after viewing an earlier event RI = retroactive inhibition or interference Classic experiment - Loftus (1978)
52
52 Loftus (1978)
53
53 Loftus (1978) Results
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.