1. 2 Training Variation Periodization
C H A P T E R
Training Variation
Periodization
Dan Wathen, Thomas R. Baechle, and Roger W. Earle

2. Chapter Outline Responses to training stress Periodization cycles
Periodization periods
Applying sport seasons to the periodization periods
Undulating (nonlinear) versus linear periodization models
Example of a macrocycle

3. Responses to Training Stress: General Adaptation Syndrome (GAS)
Alarm
Resistance
Exhaustion

4. The General Adaptation Syndrome

5. Periodization Cycles
Macrocycle: typically constitutes an entire training year
Mesocycle: several weeks to several months
Microcycle: typically one week long but could last up to four weeks

6. 
Periodization involves shifting training priorities from non-sport-specific activities of high volume and low intensity to sport-specific activities of low volume and high intensity over a period of many weeks to prevent overtraining and optimize performance.

7. Matveyev’s Model of Periodization
Appropriate for Novice Athletes

8. Modification of Matveyev’s Model of Periodization
Tailored for Advanced Athletes

9. Periodization Periods
Preparatory period
- Hypertrophy/endurance phase: very low to moderate intensity and very high to moderate volume
- Basic strength phase: high intensity and moderate volume
- Strength/power phase: high intensity and low volume
First transition period
- Competition period
- Second transition period (active rest)

10. Applying Sport Seasons to the Periodization Periods
Off-season: the period between the last contest and 6 weeks prior to the first contest of the next year’s season
Preseason: the period leading up to the first contest
In-season: the period that contains all the contests scheduled for that year, including tournament games
Postseason: the period after the final contest and before the start of the next year’s off-season

11. Macrocycle for a Team Sport
V = volume; I = intensity; blue line = emphasis on sport technique training or practice

12. Periodization Models
The traditional model is commonly referred to as linear due to the gradually progressive microcycle increases in intensity over time.
The undulating or nonlinear model involves large daily (i.e., within the week or microcycle) fluctuations in the load and volume assignments for core exercises.

13. Macrocycle Example for Resistance Training Component of Scenario A
Macrocycle Example for Resistance Training Component of Scenario A*: Preseason Mesocycle
Period covers about 3 1/2 months (mid-August until the first game in mid-November).
Goals are to increase the intensity of sport-specific training and the attention given to basketball drills and skills.
The resistance training portion is planned for three times per week and focuses primarily on strength and power outcomes.
*For a description of this athlete, see p. 396 of Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning.

14. Macrocycle Example for Resistance Training Component of Scenario A: In-Season Mesocycle (Competition Period)
Period covers about 20 weeks (November to April).
Goals are to maintain and possibly improve strength, power, flexibility, and anaerobic conditioning.
Resistance training may be limited to 30 min, one to two times per week, consisting of an undulating regime of varying volumes of relatively high intensities due to multiple games each week.

15. Macrocycle Example for Resistance Training Component of Scenario A: Postseason Mesocycle (Active Rest Period)
This transition period lasts a month (April).
Goal is to recuperate physically and psychologically from the long in-season.
All activities are performed at low intensities with low volumes.

16. Macrocycle Example for Resistance Training Component of Scenario A: Off-Season Mesocycle
This preparatory period lasts about 14 weeks (the beginning of May to the beginning of August).
Goal is to establish a base level of conditioning to increase the athlete’s tolerance for more intense training in later phases and periods.
During first week, testing should be performed to determine initial training loads for the exercises in the first microcycle. In later microcycles, when more exercises are added, training loads can be estimated from loads used in similar exercises or determined directly from RM testing.