1. MOBILITY FEES, SMART GROWTH AND FUNDING July 11, 2012

2. Presentation Overview What is the reason? Key concepts Initiatives Around the State Wrap-up 2

3. 3 What is the reason? Change  Is there a reason?  Can we get community buy-in?  Do we have the political desire?

4. 4 What is Clay County’s Reason for Change?  Jobs  Economy  Funding  Tax Base What is the reason?

5. Presentation Overview What is the reason? Key concepts Initiatives Around the State Wrap-up 5

6. Spending flexibility Creating development incentive tools Getting the right development form and location Creating new jobs Multiple revenue sources Optimizing revenues per unit of land use 6 Key Concepts

7. Presentation Overview What is the reason? Key concepts Initiatives Around the State Wrap-up 7

8. City of Oviedo City of Tampa Pasco Plant City Osceola City of Aventura City of Sarasota City of North Port Collier Orange City of Orlando Panama City Alachua City of Destin City of DeLand City of Jacksonville = TOA Working On = TOA Monitoring 8 Initiatives Around the State Mobility Fees and Plans

9. Selected Projects  Pasco County  City of Tampa  Osceola County  City of Orlando 9 Initiatives Around the State

10. Pasco County Mobility Fee Reason for change… …Did not want to continue to be a bedroom community for Hillsborough and Pinellas counties. 10

11. Factors Motivating Pasco: 48% of Pasco County workers employed outside of Pasco County boundaries – Highest % of commuters in Region 12% Unemployment – Highest % in Region 11 Pasco County Mobility Fee

12. Factors Motivating Pasco (Continued): Highest impact fees in Region Unsustainable Growth Patterns Tax Base dependent on residential development (79%) 12 Pasco County Mobility Fee

13. Study Completed 13 Pasco County Mobility Fee

14. “The whole point of the new fees is to do two things: create jobs and redirect growth in a way that’s healthier for the County. …. The idea is to keep the growth in the urban areas, keeping rural areas rural” John Hagen, President and CEO of the Pasco Economic Development Council 14 Pasco County Mobility Fee

15. County Objectives: Vary fees geographically Incentives for job creating land uses Flexibility to spend fees across modes Other revenues subsidize incentives 15 Pasco County Mobility Fee

16. County Objectives Continued: Tolerate greater congestion in urban area Penny for Pasco to be reauthorized in 2014 Expand transit service Earmark funds for state roads Opt in provision for cities 16 Pasco County Mobility Fee

17. County Objectives Continued: Other revenues subsidize/buy-down fees Gas Tax Penny for Pasco Sales Tax New Tax Increment (1/3 of growth county-wide) Required buy-down calculated yearly based on permit issuance 17 Pasco County Mobility Fee

18. Rural Suburban Urban Vary Rate Schedules Geographically 18 Pasco County Mobility Fee

19. Traditional Office Fee Per 1000 SF $2,000 Old Fee = $3,703 $0 $1,000 19 Vary Land Use Rate by Geographic Area Pasco County Mobility Fee

20. TND Office Per 1000 SF $500 Old Fee = $3,703 $0 $250 $2,000 $1,000 20 Pasco County Mobility Fee Vary Land Use Rate by Geographic Area

21. No Fee for TOA in Targeted Overlay Areas TOD All Uses Per 1000 SF Old Fee = N/A N/A $0 21 Pasco County Mobility Fee

22. Summary: Implement comprehensive plan Economic development incentive tool New jobs in Pasco County Right development form, right place, right time Now updating the Land Development Code 22 Pasco County Mobility Fee

23. Selected Projects  Pasco County  City of Tampa  Osceola County  City of Orlando 23 Initiatives Around the State

24. City of Tampa Reason for change… …Wanted to provide a flexible and expedited review process to guide growth and development into targeted areas while protecting neighborhoods and single-use areas. 24

25. Protected Neighborhoods Strategic Vision Protected Areas Stringent Review Requirements Must Meet Concurrency City of Tampa

26. Targeted Growth Districts Pay-and-Go Expedited Review Requirements Redevelopment Districts Westshore DRIs Downtown CRAs Pay and Go Strategic Vision City of Tampa

27. Strategic Vision Targeted Growth Districts Pay-and-Go Expedited Review Requirements Bus Rapid Transit Corridors Streetcar Service Area Transit Centers Bus Transfer Centers Pay & Go City of Tampa

28. Selected Projects  Pasco County  City of Tampa  Osceola County  City of Orlando 28 Initiatives Around the State

29. 29 Reasons for change… Roadway conditions worsening Wanted county-wide transportation system that carried out County conceptual master plans with a long- term capital and operating funding plan Osceola County Transportation Funding Study

30. Revenue Source (Red Sources Currently Used to Fund Transportation) Regional or Countywide SubareaProject Level Gas Taxes (1st Local Option Fuel Tax, Ninth Cent, Constitutional, County, etc.) X Gas Tax (2 nd Local Option 5 cents)X Local Discretionary Sales Surtax (Charter Co.)X Local Infrastructure Sales Surtax – 1%X Ad Valorem TaxesX MSTU / MSBUXX Public Service TaxXX Special Assessment District (SAD)X Community Development DistrictXX Tax Increment Financing (TIF) DistrictXX Community Redevelopment Area (CRA)X Transportation Development Fee (Impact Fee)XX Osceola County Transportation Funding Study

31. BCC Direction (Four Workshops): Improve maintenance conditions Eliminate transportation impact fees No new taxes; think out of the box first Equity and fairness between who pays Enhance current maintenance funding Rebalance projects with existing revenues Must have implementation action plan 31 Osceola County Transportation Funding Study

32. Revenue Source (Red Sources Board Direction to be Used to Fund Transportation) Regional or Countywide SubareaProject Level Gas Taxes (1st Local Option Fuel Tax, Ninth Cent, Constitutional, County, etc.) X Ad Valorem TaxesX Local Infrastructure Sales Surtax – 1%X 1. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) New GrowthXX 2. Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Existing BaseXX 3. Local Discretionary Sales Surtax (Charter Co.)X Gas Tax (2 nd Local Option 5 cents)XX Community Development DistrictXX Special Assessment District (SAD)X MSTU / MSBUXX Public Service TaxXX Osceola County Transportation Funding Study

33. Implementation considerations Develop legal framework and issues for new growth and existing base DAT ordinances Define issues and develop ordinance to repeal transportation impact fee ordinance Define any other issues relating to BCC direction on transportation funding Coordinate with cities Update Comprehensive Plan and Code Osceola County Transportation Funding Study

34. Presentation Overview What is the reason? Key concepts Initiatives Around the State Wrap-up 34

35. Spending flexibility (Pasco and Orlando) Creating development incentive tools (Pasco and Orlando) Getting the right development form and location (Pasco, Orlando, Tampa, Osceola) Creating new jobs (Pasco, Orlando, Osceola) Multiple revenue sources (Pasco and Osceola) Optimizing revenues per unit of land use (Orlando and Osceola) 35 Wrap-up

36. Thank You ! Bob Wallace, P.E., AICP Tindale-Oliver & Associates bwallace@tindaleoliver.com

37. Selected Projects  Pasco County  City of Tampa  Osceola County  City of Orlando 37 Initiatives Around the State

38. City of Orlando Reason for change… …Wanted flexibility to spend funds across alternative modes and incentives for mixed-use and transit-oriented development. 38

39. Key Concepts: Flexibility to spend fees across modes Incentives for transit oriented and mixed-use land uses Existing revenues subsidize incentives City of Orlando Multi-Modal Transportation Fee 39

40. 1 3 2 Initial Planning Areas 40 City of Orlando Multi-Modal Transportation Fee

41. Area 1A: Annual Growth Rate (2010- 2040): Population = 2.18% Employment = 0.75% Area 1B: Annual Growth Rate (2010-2040): Population = 0.36% Employment = 0.49% Area 2: Annual Growth Rate (2010- 2040): Population = 1.75% Employment = 1.77% Area 3: Annual Growth Rate (2010-2040): Population = 4.76% Employment = 9.22% 41 City of Orlando Multi-Modal Transportation Fee

42. Smart Growth Application Legend Mixed Use/TOD A1 A2A3 C2C3 C1 City of Orlando Multi-Modal Transportation Fee

43. C1 C2 C3 Property Tax Revenue per Acre City of Orlando Multi-Modal Transportation Fee

44. 1 st Credit Area 1 City Avg. 2 nd Credit Area 2 Area 3 Currently Adopted Fee Rate City of Orlando Multi-Modal Transportation Fee