Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEvangeline Arnold Modified over 9 years ago
1
The Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission The 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2007 1
2
City of Columbus Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG) Central Ohio Transit Authority 2
3
Columbus Pedestrian Thoroughfare Plan Review of MAG Latent Demand Model MORPC’s Modification Results Conclusions 3
4
Columbus Pedestrian Thoroughfare Plan Review of MAG Latent Demand Model MORPC’s Modification Results Conclusions 4
5
Identify major pedestrian network Recognize pedestrian travel needs Promote pedestrian activities 5
6
Columbus Pedestrian Thoroughfare Plan Review of MAG Latent Demand Model MORPC’s Modification Results Conclusions 6
7
“Gravity-based” Model Non-linked vs. Linked Latent Demand Score (LDS): 0~100% Relative levels of potential pedestrian travel demand among a given network 7
8
Both ends of walk trips Attraction Production 8 P PPP P PPP A A
9
9 Distance matters Source: MAG Pedestrian 2000-Technical Appendix, Dec 1999
10
P PPP P PPP Spatial queries Buffer 10 A A
11
11 Attractor-base queries Segment-based queries
12
12 Attractor-base queries Segment-based queries
13
Non-linked trips: entire trip made by foot ◦ Work (college/University) ◦ Shopping and Errands ◦ School ◦ Recreational Linked trips: partial trip made by foot (most of the trip made by auto/other motorized modes) 13
14
LDS - normalization 0 ~ 100% ◦ Non-linked ◦ Linked Combine non-linked and linked trips “Composite” LDS=MAX(non-linked LDS, Linked LDS) 14
15
Columbus Pedestrian Thoroughfare Plan Review of MAG Latent Demand Model MORPC’s Modification Results Conclusions 15
16
Grid System vs. TAZ Impact of Transit Service Additional Pedestrian “Attractors” 16
17
Regional Connections 17 TAZGrid
18
MAG linked pedestrian trips Linked LDS = E/A E=total employment within the buffer A=total area within the buffer Attraction (employment) end vs. production (residence) end Auto vs. Transit 18
19
Revised linked pedestrian trips Linked LDS = (P b%+E)/A P=total population within the buffer b%=transit share of trips by the population E=total employment within the buffer A=total area within the buffer 19
20
Transit Share – b% ◦ Mode split information at Block Group (BG) level from Census 2000 SF3 data ◦ Mode split information at Grid level? ◦ Transit Service Frequency by Route at Grid level from Central Ohio Transit Authority (COTA) Stops in the Grid Headways 20
21
Transit Share – b% (cont’d) b%=M% (f / F) M%= max. BG transit share within the entire region considered. f= transit service frequency within Grid/its buffer. F=max. transit service frequency within Grid/its buffer. 21
22
Government buildings, sport arena, museum, libraries, theaters, etc. Four Categories ◦ Service area (local vs. regional) ◦ Service type (general vs. special) 22
23
Service Area LocalRegional Service Type GeneralLibraryMuseum SpecialBMVFairground 23 Four Categories
24
24 Weight Score Service Area LocalRegional Service Type General32 Special21
25
Example of weighting factor ◦ Library and Fairground in the buffer of a segment with LDS = 80% Weight score = 3+1=4 Weighting factor = 1.04 (multiplicative) New LDS = 80% 1.04= 83.2% 25
26
Columbus Pedestrian Thoroughfare Plan Review of MAG Latent Demand Model MORPC’s Modification Results Conclusions 26
27
27
28
28
29
29
30
30
31
Columbus Pedestrian Thoroughfare Plan Review of MAG Latent Demand Model MORPC’s Modification Results Conclusions 31
32
Understanding pedestrian travel demand Evaluating existing sidewalk system (ongoing) Prioritizing pedestrian facility improvements in a consistent way Future work: refine methodologies and update the results periodically 32
33
Ahmad Al-Akhras alakhras@morpc.orgalakhras@morpc.org Chris Gawronski cgawronski@morpc.orgcgawronski@morpc.org Anthony Hull ahull@morpc.orgahull@morpc.org Zhuojun Jiang zjiang@morpc.orgzjiang@morpc.org 33
34
34 Questions ? Please use the Microphone.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.