1. 1 Evaluating the Vulnerability of Network Mechanisms to Sophisticated DDoS Attacks Udi Ben-Porat Tel-Aviv University, Israel Anat Bremler-Barr IDC Herzliya, Israel Hanoch Levy ETH Zurich, Switzerland

2. 2 Study Objective Propose a DDoS Vulnerability performance metric  Vulnerability Measure  To be used in addition to traditional system performance metrics Understanding the vulnerability of different systems to sophisticated attacks This Talk Describe DDoS Vulnerability performance metric Demonstrate Metric impact  Hash Table: Very Common in networking  Performance (traditional) : OPEN equivalent CLOSED  Vulnerability analysis: OPEN << CLOSED!!

3. 3 Distributed Denial of Service ( DDoS ) Attacker adds more regular users Loading the server - degrades the performance Server Performance Server Attacker Normal DDoS S. DDoS

4. 4 Sophisticated DDoS Normal DDoS S. DDoS Server Performance Server Attacker Attacker adds sophisticated malicious users Each user creates maximal damage (per attack budget)

5. 5 Sophisticated Attacks Examples  Simple example: Database server Make hard queries Goal: consume CPU time  Sophisticated attacks in the research: Reduction of Quality (RoQ) Attacks on Internet End-Systems Mina Guirguis, Azer Bestavros, Ibrahim Matta and Yuting Zhang INFOCOM 2005 Low-Rate TCP-Targeted Denial of Service Attacks A. Kuzmanovic and E.W.Knightly Sigcomm 2003 Denial of Service via Algorithmic Complexity Attacks Scott A. Crosby and Dan S. Wallach Usenix 2003

6. 6 Our goal Proposing a Vulnerability measurement for all sophisticated DDoS attack  Vulnerability Measurement Understanding the vulnerability of different systems to sophisticated attacks  Later: Hash Tables and Queuing

7. 7 Vulnerability Factor Definition Vulnerability= v means: Malicious user degrades the server performance v -times more than regular user Performance Degradation Scales (st = Malicious Strategy)

8. 8 Vulnerability Factor Definition Performance After adding (budget =c) After adding (budget=c) Normal DDoS S. DDoS

9. 9 Demonstration of Vulnerability metric: Attack on Hash Tables Central component in networks Hash table is a data structure based on Hash function and an array of buckets. Operations: Insert, Search and Delete of elements according to their keys. key Insert (element) Buckets Hash(key) User Server

10. 10 Hash Tables Bucket = one element Collision-> the array is repeatedly probed until an empty bucket is found Bucket = list of elements that were hashed to that bucket Open Hash Closed Hash

11. 11 Performance Factors In Attack  While attack is on: Attacker’s operations are CPU intensive  CPU loaded Post Attack:  Loaded Table  insert/delete/search op’s suffer Vulnerability: OPEN vs. CLOSED Traditional Performance: OPEN = CLOSED* What about Vulnerability? OPEN = CLOSED ? ( * when the buckets array of closed hash is twice bigger)

12. 12 Attacker strategy (InsStrategy) Strategy:  Insert k elements (cost=budget=k) where all elements hash into the same bucket ( )  Theorem: InsStrategy is Optimal For both performance factors Closed Hash: Cluster Open Hash: One long list of elements Attack Results

13. 13 In Attack: Resource Consumption V = Analytic results: Open Hash: Closed Hash: In every malicious insertion, the server has to traverse all previous inserted elements (+ some existing elements) Open Hash Closed Hash V =

14. 14 Post Attack: Operation Complexity Open Hash Closed Hash Open Hash: Vulnerability =1 No Post Attack degradation in Open Hash (Only small chance to traverse the malicious list) Closed Hash: Big chance the operation has to traverse part of the big cluster

15. 15 Post Attack: account for queuing Requests for the server are queued up Vulnerability of the (post attack) Waiting Time? Hash Table Server

16. 16 Post Attack Waiting Time Open Hash: Vulnerable !! While in the model of Post Attack Operation Complexity the Open Hash is not Vulnerable ! Closed Hash: Drastically more vulnerable resulting: clusters increase the second moment of the hash operation times No longer stable for Load>48% Stability Point

17. 17 Conclusions Closed Hash is much more vulnerable than the Open Hash to DDoS, even though the two systems are considered to be equivalent via traditional performance evaluation. After the attack has ended, regular users still suffer from performance degradation Application using Hash in the Internet, where there is a queue before the hash, has high vulnerability.

18. 18 Related Work The alternative measure: Potency [RoQ]  Was defined only to RoQ  Only count the performance degradation of a specific attack  Vulnerability measures the system  Meaningless without additional numbers  Vulnerability is meaningful information based on this number alone Analyzing Hash: Comparing Closed to Open Hash, also analyzing the post attack performance degradation (Denial of Service via Algorithmic Complexity Attacks Scott A. Crosby and Dan S. Wallach Usenix 2003)

19. 19 Questions?