Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Performance Metric Achievement Log. % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal GOAL.

Published bySophia Quinn Modified over 9 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Performance Metric Achievement Log. % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal GOAL."— Presentation transcript:

1 Performance Metric Achievement Log

2 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal GOAL EXCEEDED! 84% Max Score 84% Max Score

3 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates $ Not Earned Yet, Overbudget Performance Metric Achievement Log

4 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Accepted as Finalists!!, First Main Functionality Achieved, $ Earned Performance Metric Achievement Log

5 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Winter Break Performance Metric Achievement Log

6 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Realized Significant Limitations In Original Design Performance Metric Achievement Log

7 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Realized Significant Limitations In Original Design Performance Metric Achievement Log Redesigning for New Sensor System, Temporary Loss of Functionality

8 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Realized Significant Limitations In Original Design Performance Metric Achievement Log Redesigning for New Sensor System, Temporary Loss of Functionality New Sensor Systems Work! (Mostly) Significant Performance Jump

9 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Project Completed!, but… Testing Proves Under Target % Max Performance Goal Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal

10 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Optional Functionality Added, Retest with Feature Tweaks Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal

11 % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal GOAL EXCEEDED! 84% Max Score 84% Max Score

12

13 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix

14 * Full matrix with attribute values available in Appendix D of repot Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption 3Commincation Rate 1Weight 2Footprint 3Ease of Use 4Assoc. Programming Req. 4Ease of Calibration 2Availability 4Noise Sensitivity 3Accuracy 5Precision 3Cost Total Weighted Score

15 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix * Full matrix with attribute values available in Appendix D of repot Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption 3Commincation Rate 1Weight 2Footprint 3Ease of Use 4Assoc. Programming Req. 4Ease of Calibration 2Availability 4Noise Sensitivity 3Accuracy 5Precision 3Cost Total Weighted Score Sensor Component Specific Attributes Sensor Attributes directly related to Key Performance Metrics

16 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix * Full matrix with attribute values available in Appendix D of repot Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption 3Commincation Rate 1Weight 2Footprint 3Ease of Use 4Assoc. Programming Req. 4Ease of Calibration 2Availability 4Noise Sensitivity 3Accuracy 5Precision 3Cost Total Weighted Score Key Attributes

17 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption2520102010 3Commincation Rate91215 9 1Weight12523 2Footprint46846 3Ease of Use15129915 4Assoc. Programming Req.2012 16 4Ease of Calibration816121612 2Availability882610 4Noise Sensitivity12820 12 3Accuracy9612 9 5Precision1020 2515 3Cost12 999 Total Weighted Score133134 154126 “Mixed Bag” of Pros & Cons

18 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption2520102010 3Commincation Rate91215 9 1Weight12523 2Footprint46846 3Ease of Use15129915 4Assoc. Programming Req.2012 16 4Ease of Calibration816121612 2Availability882610 4Noise Sensitivity12820 12 3Accuracy9612 9 5Precision1020 2515 3Cost12 999 Total Weighted Score133134 154126 Good in Performance Metrics but Implementation Issues

19 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption2520102010 3Commincation Rate91215 9 1Weight12523 2Footprint46846 3Ease of Use15129915 4Assoc. Programming Req.2012 16 4Ease of Calibration816121612 2Availability882610 4Noise Sensitivity12820 12 3Accuracy9612 9 5Precision1020 2515 3Cost12 999 Total Weighted Score133134 154126 In-House Experience & Availability, but Lacking Performance

20 Main Sensor Selection Decision Matrix * Full matrix with attribute values available in Appendix D of repot Wt.Attributes Popular Sensor 1 Popular Sensor 2 Unusual Find Reliable Company Likely Audience Favorite 5Power Consumption2520102010 3Commincation Rate91215 9 1Weight12523 2Footprint46846 3Ease of Use15129915 4Assoc. Programming Req.2012 16 4Ease of Calibration816121612 2Availability882610 4Noise Sensitivity12820 12 3Accuracy9612 9 5Precision1020 2515 3Cost12 999 Total Weighted Score133134 154126 Overall Winner w/ Great Performance & Good Implementation

Download ppt "Performance Metric Achievement Log. % of Maximum Performance Metric Score Achieved Milestone Review Dates Performance Metric Achievement Log Goal GOAL."

Similar presentations

Program Assessment Briefing (PAB) Instructions Chart 1: Overview Provide a narrative mission description – Self explanatory Provide executive level program.

Program Assessment Briefing (PAB) Instructions Chart 1: Overview Provide a narrative mission description – Self explanatory Provide executive level program.
University of Kentucky Supply Cabinet Quote Analysis Date: 12/21/2009.

University of Kentucky Supply Cabinet Quote Analysis Date: 12/21/2009.
Radford Surveys + Consulting Preparing for An IPO – A Total Compensation Approach N.A.C.D. September 27, 2005 Ed Speidel 508-460-2038.

Radford Surveys + Consulting Preparing for An IPO – A Total Compensation Approach N.A.C.D. September 27, 2005 Ed Speidel
Event management from a geographic perspective. EVENT MANAGEMENT FROM A GEOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE Geography is the study of people and their interaction.

Event management from a geographic perspective. EVENT MANAGEMENT FROM A GEOGRAPHIC PERSPECTIVE Geography is the study of people and their interaction.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported LicenseCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY). Project Management.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported LicenseCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY). Project Management.
Chapter 4 Return and Risks.

Chapter 4 Return and Risks.
Open Source Software Wrap-Up By Lance Faxon. Open Source General History Definitions Patents Cathedral and Bazaar Business Microsoft Models Open v. Proprietary.

Open Source Software Wrap-Up By Lance Faxon. Open Source General History Definitions Patents Cathedral and Bazaar Business Microsoft Models Open v. Proprietary.
SPACE MOUSE.

SPACE MOUSE.
Teaching materials to accompany:

Teaching materials to accompany:
Product Design L6- Ch7: Concept selection

Product Design L6- Ch7: Concept selection
IE673Session 4 - Customer Relationships1 Customer Relationships (The Voice of the Customer)

IE673Session 4 - Customer Relationships1 Customer Relationships (The Voice of the Customer)
Minimum Error Rate Training in Statistical Machine Translation By: Franz Och, 2003 Presented By: Anna Tinnemore, 2006.

Minimum Error Rate Training in Statistical Machine Translation By: Franz Och, 2003 Presented By: Anna Tinnemore, 2006.
Semi-supervised protein classification using cluster kernels Jason Weston, Christina Leslie, Eugene Ie, Dengyong Zhou, Andre Elisseeff and William Stafford.

Semi-supervised protein classification using cluster kernels Jason Weston, Christina Leslie, Eugene Ie, Dengyong Zhou, Andre Elisseeff and William Stafford.
Canada Feature Film Fund. 2 Key changes to the 2005-2006 Guidelines Implementation of modular guidelines, with distinct components or modules for each.

Canada Feature Film Fund. 2 Key changes to the Guidelines Implementation of modular guidelines, with distinct components or modules for each.
Nearest Neighbor Classifiers other names: –instance-based learning –case-based learning (CBL) –non-parametric learning –model-free learning.

Nearest Neighbor Classifiers other names: –instance-based learning –case-based learning (CBL) –non-parametric learning –model-free learning.
Development of a Precision Tilt Sensor for a Cryogenic Torsion Balance Experiment Micah Koller Carleton College INT REU Program 2011 University of Washington.

Development of a Precision Tilt Sensor for a Cryogenic Torsion Balance Experiment Micah Koller Carleton College INT REU Program 2011 University of Washington.
55:148 Digital Image Processing Chapter 11 3D Vision, Geometry Topics: Basics of projective geometry Points and hyperplanes in projective space Homography.

55:148 Digital Image Processing Chapter 11 3D Vision, Geometry Topics: Basics of projective geometry Points and hyperplanes in projective space Homography.
Sample Presentation Title. Agenda (Required)  Background Information  User Impact (Who?)  Status  Accomplishment / Completed Milestones  Metrics.

Sample Presentation Title. Agenda (Required)  Background Information  User Impact (Who?)  Status  Accomplishment / Completed Milestones  Metrics.
Improving Multiplication and Division Skills Integrated Algebra.

Improving Multiplication and Division Skills Integrated Algebra.
Break-Even Analysis Further Uses

Break-Even Analysis Further Uses

Similar presentations

Ads by Google