Download presentation
1
Modeling of semiconductor nanowires
V.G. Dubrovskii St. Petersburg Academic University & Ioffe Physical Technical Institute RAS, St.-Petersburg, Russia Plan: Introduction Growth modeling Crystal structure of III-V nanowires Strain induced by lattice mismatch Self-induced GaN nanowires Self-regulated pulsed nucleation in VLS nanowires Repino, 14 July 2013, Lecture # 2
2
Books Monograph “Theory of formation of epitaxial nanostructures”
By V.G. Dubrovskii Moscow, Fizmatlit 2009 352 p. New book (2013): V.G. Dubrovskii “Nucleation theory and growth of nanostructures” Springer
3
Selected papers on NWs 4 13 5
4
8 12
5
Papers on nucleation theory
Nucleation and growth: 3 Ostwald ripening: Linear peptide chains:
6
Modern NWs and their applications
GaN/AlN, Ioffe & LPN CNRS GaAs, MBE, e-beam (Ioffe & LPN CNRS) InAs/InP, Lund U InAs, MOCVD, nanoimprint (Lund U) Nanosensors Nanophotonics Nanoelectronics
7
Modern nanowires and their importance
Nano Lett. 10, 1529 (2010) Where is the killer application? Nanowire based single cell endoscopy Exponential increase in the number of publications: Biological probe for endoscopy, spot delivery and sensing within a single living cell 2) Nanowires for direct solar to fuel conversion 3) Integrated nanophotonics 1 – solar cells, 2 – LEDs/lasers, 3 – nanoribbons, 4 – photonic bandgap NW arrays, 5 – sample analysis chambers, 7- photodetectors, - microfluidic systems 4) fundamental physics: growth and properties
8
Advantages of nanowire based optoelectronics
Easy to fabricate uniform arrays by organizing seeds before growth Smallest LEDs / lasers of any kind (10s nm in diameter, a few microns in length) (Potentially) high efficiency (electronic active medium and optical waveguide being identical: large confinement factor) Vertical cavity and surface emitting Easy to realize single photon emission Much less restricted by lattice mismatch => III-Vs on Si substrates, coherent strained heterostructures in NWs Wurtzite phase of ZB III-Vs (C. Chang-Hasnain group, UC Berkeley APL 2007)
9
Nanowire heterostructures
10
Au-assisted VLS growth: the first wires
Au-assisted CVD of Si “whiskers” on Si(111) at T~1000 0C (Wagner & Ellis, 1964) Fundamental aspects of VLS growth: Givargizov, in “Highly anisotropic crystals”, 1975 Alloy at equilibrium with solid Liquid Vapor Au catalyst Si is transferred from vapor to solid through liquid drop on the wire top (Tm=363 0C) Liquid drop acts as a chemical catalyst: pyrolysis rate > 0 at the drop surface and = 0 at the substrate surface Simple phase diagram of Au-Si alloy: no Au in the wire? Si wires
11
Au-assisted VLS growth of III-V nanowires by MBE
12
Kinetic processes driving nanowire growth
1 – direct impingement 2 – desorption from the drop 3 – diffusion from the sidewalls 4 – desorption from the sidewalls 5 – diffusion from the substrate to the sidewalls, 6 – diffusion from the substrate to the drop 7 – surface nucleation Nucleation-mediated wire growth resulting in the vertical growth rate Supersaturation of gaseous phase to the solid (= to equilibrium alloy with concentration Ceq) Supersaturation of (liquid) alloy in the drop to the solid V.G.Dubrovskii et al., PRE 2004, PRB 2005, PRE 2006, PRB 2008, PRB 2009; PRB 2010, APL 2011 W.Seifert et al., JCG 272, 211 (2004), L.Schubert et al., APL 84, 4968 (2004)….
13
Model of diffusion-induced NW growth
Stationary growth with R = const Direct impingement Adatom diffusion, substrate and sidewalls GT effect in the drop Surface adatoms (s): Sidewall adatoms (f): Four boundary conditions: ω = 1 in MOCVD and 1/π in MBE Constant concentration far away from the wire Continuity of chemical potential at the wire base Continuity of flux at the wire base Continuity of chemical potential at the wire top V.G.Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2005, 2009, PRE 2006
14
Growth kinetics Due to GT effect, coefficients
A, B and C can be of either signs ! Direct impingement, Surface growth Sidewall adatoms Surface α β J Sa B=0, C=0 (no diffusion): dl/dh=A, Classical Givargizov-Chernov case Generally: DI growth:
15
Theoretical L(t) curves
@ RGT=3.5 nm Au-assisted MBE of GaAs NWs L(t) curves are essentially non-linear !!! V.G. Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2009
16
Narrowing size distribution of <110> Ge NWs
nm Initial stage: Infinite growth: Limited growth: Dubrovskii et al., PRL 2012
17
Role of surface energies in NW polytypism
Hexagonal cross-section: 1-st approximation for lateral surface energy:
18
Surface energies: summary
Surface energy ratio WZ to ZB Facet type Surface energy, J/m2 Transition 1.73 0.75 1.50 0.867 1.30 1 Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2008; Phys. Solid State 2010
19
Role of nucleation F.Glas et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 2007, V.G. Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2008, J. Johansson et al, Cryst. Growth & design 2009 … At lower surface energy of NW sidewalls, WZ phase can form only when nucleation takes place at the triple phase line (TL) In a mononuclear mode, the structure is dictated by the monolayer island orientation Two conditions of WZ phase formation: Condition for TL nucleation (straight sidewalls): LV surface energy should not be too high! High enough supersaturation to create a stacking fault G2< G1 Nucleation barriers
20
Theoretical conclusions
Surface energy of relevant WZ sidewalls is indeed lower than of ZB ones TL nucleation can be suppressed by a lower surface energy catalyst Structure retains to bulk ZB at large R because the ring of critical size dissapears (Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2008) Growth and phase diagrams: CUB – blue curves HEX – red curves 0.83 0.875 τ=0.95 0.91 GaAs, R=20 nm
21
Two step growth with temperature ramping
1 nm Au layer deposited on GaAs(111)B surface Sample A grown at 6300C from the beginning => no NW growth Growth at 5300C for tLT; growth temperature ramped from 530 to 6300C within 2 min, Ga and As4 fluxes maintained; growth at 6300C, V=0.2 nm/s Sample B: tLT=1.5 min, NO NW growth Sample C: tLT=15 min, NW GROW longer than 2 nm V.G. Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2009 Riber 32 (LPN) Complex NW shape: Branching, tapering Continuing growth Sample A: tLT=0 Sample B: tLT=1.5 min Sample C: tLT=15 min
22
Two step growth with temperature ramping
- 0.4 nm Au layer deposited on GaAs(111)B surface - Samples 1 grown at 6300 C from the beginning => no NW growth Growth at 5500 C with V=0.3 nm/s for tLT - Growth temperature ramped from 530 to 630 0C, - Growth at 6300 C for 48 min, V=0.15 nm/s, V/III=4. Sample 2: tLT =2 min, NO NW growth - Sample 3: tLT =12 min, NW GROW longer than 10 microns EP1203 (Ioffe) More regular shape Sample 3 before and after high temperature growth step
23
Control of crystal structure: stacking fault free GaAs NWs grown with two T steps via scenario IV
High resolution TEM studies of a NW detached from sample C: 200 nm 40 nm Pure WZ Pure ZB Transition region
24
Optical properties of WZ and WZ/ZB GaAs NWs:
Pure WZ NWs B.V. Novikov et al., PSS RRL 2010: WZ/ZB heterostructures D. Spikoska et al., PRB 2009: Type II band structure: Predominantly ZB NWs Pure WZ NWs Band alignment and the first e and h levels v thickness PL spectra: 1.51 to 1.43 eV shift for different proportions of WZ EZB-EWZ=41 meV, redshift opposite to InP
25
Control of crystal phase by growth catalyst: Ga-catalyzed GaAs NWs
Dubrovskii et al., PRB 2010, Nano Letters 2011 TPL nucleation condition: 1.3 J/m2 J/m2 J/m2 for Au-Ga (at 40% Ga percentage) = to J/m2 for contact angles from 110 to 1250 A=drop B=WZ C=WZ-ZB mix-up D=ZB all the way For pure liquid Ga at the growth temperature: = 0.08 to 0.16 J/m2
26
Strain relaxation and critical dimensions in freestanding nanowires
Because of free lateral surfaces strain relaxation is expected to be much more efficient than in 2D layers and even QDs Model - linear isotropic elasticity - same elastic parameters E, n Barton J. Appl. Mech. (1941) Elastic modulus Poisson ratio
27
Strain maps ezz /e0 axis outer surface E = 90 GPa, ε0 = 0.46, ν = 0.3
28
Heterostructured nanowires (QDs in NW)
Because of free lateral surfaces strain relaxation much more efficient than in 2D layers and even QDs !!! InAs QDs in InP NWs: Axial or radial heterostructures Lund University
29
Relaxation of elastic stress in NS grown on a lattice mismatched substrate: existing models
Major asymptotic properties: Simple: Elastic energy of 2D layer (per atom) Ratsch-Zangwill: Aspect ratio: Glas: Gill-Cocks:
30
Results for elastic energy relaxation
Elastic constants of a cubic material Solid lines – calculations for different geometries Dashed lines - fits Relative strain energy for cylinders 5.5 (cone), 8 (truncated cone 700), 15 (cylinder) and 50 (reverse cone 1100)
31
Critical thickness for plastic relaxation
Energy per of a dislocation pair (Glas, PRB 2007): z r h 2R if if b is the core cutoff parameter for elastic stress, θ is the angle between the Burgers vector and dislocation line Elastic energy: a = 1 for cylinder and 0 for cone
32
Critical thickness for plastic relaxation
The excess energy of dislocation pair with respect to a fully coherent state is: Pure edge dislocations: 600 dislocations: Coherent state is stable Dislocations Critical thickness for dislocation formation
33
Critical thickness for plastic relaxation
600 dislocations in cylinder geometry: Critical thickness tends to infinity at certain critical radius which depends on lattice mismatch and NS geometry! 4% - GaAs/Si, 8.1% - InP/Si, 11.6% - InAs/Si
34
Critical dimension for plastic deformation
, therefore the equation for critical dimension is given by Critical radius v mismatch for different geometries: Dots showing MOCVD and MBE experimental data
35
III-V NWs on Si substrates: MOCVD
a – InAs with 20 nm Au on Si(111) b – InP with 20 nm Au c – InP with 60 nm Au d – InP with 120 nm Au e – TEM of 17 nm diameter InAs NW Critical diameter for the growth of epitaxial NWs on the lattice mismatched substrates (C. Chang-Hasnain group, APL 2007) WZ phase !!!
36
III-V NWs on Si substrates: MBE
Cirlin et al., PSS RRL 2010
37
Problems with VLS nanowires
Unwanted Au contamination Uncontrolled zincblende-wurtzite polytypism Use catalyst-free NN formation (GaAs on Si or sapphire) Use self-catalyzed growth (Ga instead of Au in the case of GaAs NWs) Au distribution in Au-seeded Si NWs (by P. Pareige, Rouen University, France)
38
Au contamination of Si and Ge NWs grown by MBE
Nanoscale RL
39
Self-induced GaN NWs on Si: new growth mechanism
No Ga drops are detected on top => not VLS mechanism GaN never nucleates as NW, nanoislands of different shapes are formed in the beginning (different shapes on an amorphous SixN interlayer or on mismatching AlN layer) Even on AlN, misfit dislocations are formed before NW formation; NWs are relaxed from the very beginning MBE of self-induced GaN NWs employs specific growth conditions: high N flux and high temperature are required Surface diffusion plays a crucial role in NW growth GaN NWs usually grow in both vertical and radial directions GaN NWs are hexahedral, restricted by 6 equivalent low energy m-planes
40
Self-induced GaN NWs on Si(111): radial growth !
Histograms showing diameter distributions: Growth mechanism: Length-diameter dependence: No drops are seen on NW tops NWs growing in vertical and radial direction
41
Nucleation on lattice mismatched AlN layer
MBE on Si(111) substrates 5 nm thick AlN buffer layer GaN growth at T=800 C, N/Ga fluxes ratio =10 HR TEM images: RHEED patterns: 2 min, AlN buffer 10 min, GaN islands 17 min, GaN NWs RHEED and HRTEM studies show misfit dislocations in islands! a – SC islands; b – truncated pyramids c – full pyramids, d – NWs, island to NW transition at ~ nm radius
42
Role of misfit dislocations
Height v radius for different structures: dislocation
43
GaN NWs are relaxed from the beginning!
Model suggesting a series of shape transformations to relax elastic stress, NW is already relaxed: Plastic relaxation in islands is also shown in: O. Landre, C. Bougerol, H. Renevier, and B. Daudin. Nanotechnology 20, (2009)
44
Nucleation on an amorphous interlayer
Si(111) substrate 5 min exposure to active N to form SixNy amorphous layer GaN growth at T=780 C, N/Ga fluxes ratio =6.2 Epitaxial constraint should be weak! HR TEM: RHEED patterns: r0=5 nm Incubation Transition SC NWs
45
Scaling model for nucleation and growth of GaN NWs
J. Tersoff, R.M. Tromp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2782 (1993) Assumptions: No strain-induced contributions, directly applicable on an amorphous interlayer Anisotropy of surface (and edge) energy as the dominant driving force Growth anisotropy: superlinear length-radius dependence of GaN NWs ! Compare surface energy of isotropic island and anisotropic NW at given volume Illustration of the model: Surface energy of isotropic island: In SC geometry: Island volume: In SC geometry: NW volume: Surface energy of NW:
46
Scaling model for h(r) Superlinear dependence of NW length on radius with a>1 for all t With this dependence, from Using this in previous equations, the driving force for island to NW shape transformation is obtained in the form sidewalls edges in-plane Results of statistical analysis of TEM and SEM data remarkably follows the scaling dependence at: and
47
General condition for anisotropic growth
NW anisotropic growth is energetically preferred NW growth is suppressed No edge contributions between where are positive roots of cubic equation Interesting NW case relates to NW sidewall energy should be much smaller and in-plane energy compared to surface energy of the island ! 0.088
48
Parameters of GaN spherical caps and NWs
Boxy hexahedral islands with constant aspect ratio h/r = 0.088 5 nm from experimental data 3.4 nm from growth law In view of small prefactor and larger contact angle of NWs 130 meV/A2 known 137 meV/A2 Assume 100 meV/A2 meV/A2 (was 40 meV/A2 by analogy with Si/SiO2) 230 meV/A2 (was meV/A2 from Young’s eq.) 0.088
49
Scaling in GaN NW growth: kinetic model
Elongation: Tip SW surface Top facet Radial growth: Schematics of possible growth scenarios: Yellow – NW surface contributing to elongation Magenta – desorption area Grey – NW surface contributing to radial growth Blue – overgrown shells SW collection a – no radial growth, R=const b – R~t c – tapered shape d – cylindrical shape, SCALING! Neglect c, adopt model d with
50
Scaling in GaN NW growth: L(t), R(t)
V=0.045 nm/s; a=65 nm R(t0)=17 nm, L(t0)= 140 nm d=2.46: Condition for super-linear NW growth:
51
Timescale hierarchy and self-regulated pulsed nucleation in catalyzed nanowire growth
V.G. Dubrovskii St. Petersburg Academic University & Ioffe Institute RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia Plan: Nucleation statistics Oscillating morphology of growth interface Sharp nucleation probability: impact on length uniformity Nucleation theory applied to monolayer growth cycle Timescale hierarchy Au-catalyzed GaAs nanowires Conclusions V. G. Dubrovskii Phys. Rev. B. 87, (2013) Lecture 3, Repino , 14 July
52
Usual assumptions Droplet is liquid
Supersaturation in the droplet is constant during growth. Liquid-solid growth interface is planar From Dubrovskii & Sibirev JCG 2007: From Glas et al. PRL 2007:
53
Nucleation statistics in InPAs nanowires
Post-growth study of compositional modulated InPxAs1-x wires: Au-catalyzed MBE – HAADF STEM image showing composition oscillations, related to a given time interval (b) – measured L(t) fitted by the diffusion growth model Experimental determination of nucleation statistics – Length of successive nucleations, dashed line is the mean height and solid line is the mean length (b) – Histogram of nucleation events per osilattion Blue line – Poissonian; Red line – model of Glas Std deviation v length:
54
Periodically changing morphology of the growth interface in catalyzed Si, Ge and GaP nanowires
If a truncated facet is stable: Sawtooth
55
Cyclic supersaturation in Au-catalyzed Ge nanowire growth
2011
56
Impact on the length distribution of nanowires
Regular NW arrays with L=const: if droplets are organized before growth, then the wires have a narrow distribution over L L=const for R=const! Probability to observe a NW with m MLs at time t Au-seeded InAs, MOCVD, nanoimprint Au-seeded GaAs, MBE, e-beam Hypothetical growth from identical droplets, starting simultaneously at t=0, with average growth rate V (in ML/s), and RANDOM nucleation: Poissonian length distribution
57
Evolution of length distribution with growth time
Why this unwanted Poissonian broadening is not observed experimentally?
58
Material balance within 1 ML growth cycle
Consider an element that limits nucleation (Si in Au-Si or As in Au-Ga-As). Supersaturation: Perfect alloy approx. Atomic concentration of As in the droplet Droplet volume Linear scaling: Model system: Formation of 1 ML removes As atoms from the droplet Refill time: Deposition rate Effective diffusion length on NW sidewalls
59
Nucleation and growth of 2D island
The probability density of island nucleation: Re-normalized Zeldovich nucleation rate Island growth rate: Maximum suoersaturation Material balance (in absence of desorption): Atoms dissolved in the droplet Number of atoms In 2D island Total number of atoms arrived to the droplet by time t Analytical solutions: !!! Probability density Nucleation probability
60
Time scale hierarchy Island growth time = Maximum supersaturation
Analysis for Au-catalyzed GaAs: Nucleation to refill: Growth to nucleation: 0.045 nm3 0.326 nm 450 to 600 C, 0.35 J/m2 0.005 Island growth << Nucleation interval << Refill R=25 nm
61
Radius dependence Same parameters of GaAs NWs
Non-overlapping probabilities: narrow nucleation pulses, anti-correlation, uniform L Overlapping probabilities: random Poissonian Pulsed nucleation requires (i) modest growth rate; (ii) fast diffusion in the liquid; (iii) small enough radius
62
Impact of truncated edge on crystal structure
When main facet does not meet the trijunction, islands do not nucleate at the trijunction! Wetting VLS growth predicted in Experimental verification of wetting: C. García Núñez et al. J. Cryst. Growth 372, 205 (2013) Wetting without or with a truncated facet has a very similar impact on the crystal structure:
63
Thank you very much
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.