Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byMelvyn Holland Modified over 9 years ago
1
Rainfall Runoff Prediction Designed and presented by George Limpert in association with CARES and Chris Barnett Mentor: Dr. Neil Fox
2
Project Goals ● The prediction of rainfall runoff has useful applications to agriculture ● Prediction depends on terrain, soil type, and rainfall amounts ● Terrain and soil type information is already available via existing GIS systems ● Provide rainfall amounts in a form that can be read by existing GIS software ● Create a product that can be used to assist in the prediction of runoff
3
Precipitation Estimates ● Precipitation estimates are provided by radar estimates ● Over 100 WSR-88D doppler radar sites throughout the country ● Precipitation estimation algorithm takes into account terrain and reflectivity to produce an accurate estimate ● Several precipitation estimates are distributed as level III data
4
Level III Data ● Four precipitation estimate products – Digital precipitation array – One hour precipitation estimate – Three hour precipitation estimate – Storm total precipitation estimate ● Tradeoff between various products
5
One Hour Precipitation Estimate ● Radial data ● Resolution of 1 degree x 2 kilometers ● 16 levels ● Good resolution but poor precision ● Provides a range for possible precipitation total
6
Digital Precipitation Array ● Provides precipitation totals for the past hour ● 256 levels ● Approximately 4 km resolution ● Gridded data ● Good precision but mediocre resolution ● Provides an actual estimate for total precipitation
7
Level III Data ● Freely available from NWS ftp server ● Available only in a poorly documented format ● Few third party tools for decoding level III data ● NWS ftp server has limited resources and provides slow downloads
8
Requirements ● Cover the entire state of Missouri if possible ● Nine radar sites needed – Saint Louis – Pleasant Hill – Springfield – Paducah – Memphis – Tulsa – Omaha – Quad Cities – Des Moines
9
Requirements ● Produce an accurate decoding of the data ● Convert the data into a format which is readable by GIS systems ● Provide the data at reasonable intervals ● System should run automatically if possible ● Some faults should be tolerated, particularly radar downtime and network outages
10
System Structure ● Three modules organized in a linear fashion – First module downloads appropriate data for radar sites from NWS ftp servers – Second module decodes the data and converts it to a format which can be read by GIS systems – Third module uploads data to a computer with GIS software installed
11
System Structure ● Second module is the most complex and can be further broken down ● Organized into input modules, a core, and output modules ● Input modules responsible for reading in level III data ● Core selects an appropriate input and output module ● Output module produces readable data in a different format
12
Development Tools ● Cygwin provides a UNIX-like environment on a computer running Windows ● Compiler of choice is gcc ● Output graphics produced by libpng ● Output to shapefiles produced by shapelib
13
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
14
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
15
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
16
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
17
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
18
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
19
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
20
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
21
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
22
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
23
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
24
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
25
Demonstration ● March 22, 2005 ● One hour precipitation total ● Tallahassee, FL
26
Demonstration ● March 8, 2005 ● Near Montgomery, AL ● One hour precipitation total
27
Verification ● March 8, 2005 ● Near Montgomery, AL ● One hour precipitation total ● Image generated by the NWS
28
Demonstration ● March 9, 2005 ● Melbourne, FL ● Base reflectivity
29
Verification ● March 9, 2005 ● Melbourne, FL ● Base reflectivity ● Image generated by the NWS
30
Licensing ● Support free and open exchange of data and ideas ● Private weather industry wants to restrict the ability of NOAA to disseminate data to the public ● Open source software, by definition, cannot place licensing restrictions to prevent commercial use ● Therefore, this product will not be released as open source software
31
Development Status ● Core functionality of decoding level III data is completed and has been tested ● Converting data to GIS readable format has not been tested ● Automatic downloading, conversion, and uploading of data has not been tested ● Data from this project has not yet been integrated into the CARES website
32
Future Development ● Radar coverage may be improved if NWS places a WSR-88D in Mid-Missouri or north central Missouri ● Make use of actual observed rainfall totals to calibrate precipitation estimates ● Generate precipitation estimates from raw level II data ● Make use of less advanced radar to improve estimates in areas with poor radar coverage
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.