1. AR-07-01 Status Report Doug Nebert U.S. Geological Survey Task POC

2. AR-07-01 Status Subtasks: –Registries deployment –Strategic and Tactical Guidance documents –Standards and Interoperability Forum (SIF) –IP3 subtask

3. AR-07-01: Registries Define and deploy GEOSS Registries –Component and Service Registry: operational –Standards and Special Arrangements Registry: operational –Online capabilities referenced in Tactical Guidance, as of May 2008, Tactical Guidance document is still not visible on the GEO Website –Connection points between Requirements Registry and other Registries being identified (Feb 2008) User Requirements Registry prototype online for testing by UIC, published draft May 2008 Best Practices Wiki, online April 2008

4. IOC and review of component registry Per Task plan: –May 2007: IOC online, completed June 2007 –September 2007: Review and refinement (September 2007, Continued updating, maintenance contract in place with Registry developers) –January 2008: Redundant hosting of Component and Service Registry, completed May 2008 –January 2008: Integration with the Standards and Interoperability Registry, to be completed late May-June 2008

5. GEOSS Components GEOSS Standards GEOSS Special Arrangements expose may become nominate GEO Members and Participating Organizations offer U.S.A. IEEE UDDIebRS OGC CSW Z39.50/ SRU Web UI SIF External Standards Bodies Subject Matter Experts JAXR Z39.50/ SRU GEOSS Component and Service Registry GEOSS Services GEOSS Standards Registry Registries Interaction reference

6. GEOSS Standards & Special Arrangements Registry Users GEOSS Common Infrastructure GEONETCast GEO Main Web Site GEOSS Common Infrastructure GEOSS Component Registry Service Registry GEOSS Clearinghouse GEOSS Clearinghouse GEOSS Clearinghouse GEO Web Portal Requirements Registry Best Practices Wiki External Resources Catalogue Services Websites/ Web portals Documents RSS GEOSS Registered Components Catalogue Services Websites/ Web portals Documents RSS references links access accesses searches links Accesses all Registered Community Resources Links to Other Community Resources External Resources Access Clearinghouse All Common Components support external search and retrieval interfaces searches

8. User Requirements Registry Need to formalize UIC commitment for the operation and interaction with the registry – significant governance issue Web-form upload by privileged individuals anticipated Batch upload from existing requirements systems also anticipated Architectural tie-points exist between the “observations” (observable parameters) and the Services and Standards Registries Continued web services and database support to be offered by this Task to UIC during IOC

9. AR-07-01: ADC Standards and Interoperability Forum Status Report ADC Co-Chair Meeting 19 May 2008 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa

10. Recent Meetings Regular meetings by WebEx, approx. every 2 weeks in 2008 –Jan 10 th (12 participants) –Jan 24 th (7 participants) –Feb 19 th (9 participants) –March 6 th (10 participants) –March 20 th (8 participants) –April 4 th, (11 participants) –April 17 th (10 participants) –May 9 th (10 participants) In addition, 2 special meetings with NASA ECHO representative M. Burnett –to discuss ECHO entries in the service and standard registries

11. Focus of Activities Correcting and evaluating entries for standard and special arrangement (SA) Process for promotion of SA to GEOSS-registered standard SIF task workflow process –how SIF tasks get assigned, worked, approved, tracked, and made publicly available –SA entry will automatically create SIF task Establishing Subject Matter Expert (SME) database Oral presentation at ISPRS Beijing by Zhang –Paper at: http://cires.colorado.edu/~khalsa/SIF_ISPRS_Beijing.htm

12. Formation of Regional Teams European team has a funded initiative, GIGAS, to contribute to GEOSS –Question of whether it will participate in routine SIF work Japanese team? Patricia Alvarez is forming the South American team Participants in N. America team have been identified Someone to head an Indian regional team? African participants team-up with the European team for the moment, until their membership gets going

13. SIF Future Plans Monitoring of new entries into Components & Services Registry –Not a SIF responsibility –Who will check whether declared standards and SAs are used as stated? Survey of all existing and proposed GEO Tasks for issues related to standards SIF workflow management system Interaction with Best Practices Registry Meeting RT leads

14. AR-07-01: The Interoperability Process Pilot Projects (IP3) Stefano Nativi nativi@imaa.cnr.it GEO Architecture & Data Committee 23 May 2008

15. Content Origins and goals 2007 accomplishments 2008 activities & evolution of IP3 framework The Model Web Schedule Summary & Conclusions

16. EGU GA 4/08 # 16 Origins and Goals of the IP3 In 2006 the GEO Architecture and Data Committee produced a document outlining the “Process for reaching interoperability arrangements” The “Interoperability Process Pilot Project” (IP3) was conceived as a way to begin implementing the GEOSS infrastructure and testing the GEOSS interoperability process A series of projects involving several initially identified GEOSS components was initiated, with the aim of producing a suite of demonstrations for the GEO Summit in November.

17. Sources The ADC identified four areas as sources for the pilot projects. This selection was based on –the desire to involve diverse disciplines –commitments of representatives from the disciplines to actively support the process Recommendations for additional communities to participate are welcome

18. Interoperability Process Pilot Project (IP3) Status Report on 2007 IP3 activities now available Plan for IP3-2008 submitted as Position Paper to Architecture Workshop under Biodiversity area –But will involve other disciplines as well

19. EGU GA 4/08 # 19 The Challenge Utilization of earth observation data for cross- disciplinary basic and applied research requires infrastructure that supports diverse data sources The key to GEOSS’ utility and effectiveness is the implementation of interoperability process for integrating data and information systems Interoperability must be addressed not only through conceptual solutions but through prototypes and demonstration of functionality

20. EGU GA 4/08 # 20 FDSN Exotic event catalog Surface melt, ice velocity Seismic Trigger Precip, soil moisture (TIGGE) IPCC model data (NCAR) Species data Precip (TIGGE), Land Use 2007 IP3 Scenarios and Data Flows CEOP centers Seismic Events from Ice Sheet Disintegration Scenario Landslide Risk Scenario Meningitis Early Warning System Seismic Events from Ice Sheet Disintegration Scenario Species Response to Climate Change Scenario GBIF WHO NSIDC WIS WGISS Test Facility

21. EGU GA 4/08 # 21 Evolution of IP3 Framework We will develop additional multi-disciplinary use cases where 1.Users interact with a Geo-portal to submit queries 2.Query is passed to Catalog service able to distribute the query against the following standard resource types: International Standard (OGC CS-W, WMS, WCS) Community Standards (THREDDS/OPeNDAP, GBIF, MerSea SeaDataNet CDI) 3.The discovered and downloaded datasets are ingested into a model server 4.The model server generates output which is served through a standard resource server (becoming searchable)

22. Dataset resource Provider …. OGC Access Standards THREDDS /OPeNDAP Arrangements CSW/ ebRIM. CIM Catalog server (GI-cat) Distribution Mediation Services: - Distribution ˗ Message Mangmnt; ˗ Messaging; ˗ Persistence ˗ Mediation... Other International Standards GEO Portal users 1 1 2 2 3 3 4a Processing Component Discipline …. Model Server.... Discipline …. Model Server Other Discipline Model Servers Climate Change Model Server Climate Change Model Server ENM Server ENM Server Model Resource Provider Processing Component workflow Component 4b workflow Component GEOSS Components CSW/ ISO CS-W Appl. Profiles GBIF Arrangements Other specific Arrangements GEOSS Components

23. The Multidisciplinary Interoperability Process Registering a new disciplinary component: 1.Resource provider registers component which instantiates well-known services (standard / best practice) 2.The infrastructure catalog component discovers the new service instance and associates specific mediation and access capabilities with it 3.The infrastructure catalog register is updated adding the new registered resource and the new mediation functionalities -where needed

24. Service Registry Service Registry Interoperability Process International Standard / Special Interoperability Arrangement Registry Distributed catalog Earth System Science Community PROCESS Component Registry Information Communities 1 1 2 2 3 3

25. EGU GA 4/08 # 25 Model Interoperability Simulation models are generally built in isolation and do not easily interoperate with others Result: lost opportunities to address important questions Barriers to interoperability are both technical and cultural For IP3 we will develop and register model interoperability arrangements along with specific mediation solutions and possibly recommendations for new standards.

26. April 2008 The Model Web initiative or Improve existing models Create new models Increase model interoperability Model Web Model A Model B Model C Dataset 1 Dataset 2 Model D Model E Model F Dataset 3 Dataset 4 Model G Gary Geller NASA JPL California Institute of Technology

27. Distributed network of interoperating models (and datasets and sensors) Using Service-Oriented Architecture Data format and terminology issues resolved Multi-disciplinary scope Grows organically within framework of broad goals and data exchange standards Models and datasets maintained, operated, and served independently Web access provided to researchers, managers, public… Model Web: 5-10+ Year Vision

28. CC and Species Distribution Global Climate Model Regional Climate Model Fire Model Landscape Model Species distribution As the climate changes, can rare species X still exist within my park in 2057? TOPS Species Distribution Model

29. Human Health Global Climate Model Regional Climate Model Infection Rate Model Human Population Density and Distribution Model Vector Niche Model Infection Rates How will CC affect infection rate of dengue fever in Vietnam? Socioeconomic Fossil Fuel Use Model Deforestation/ Disturbance Model Observational Data (environment & vector distribution)

30. Schedule July 2008 - Initial prototype September 2008 – Report to ADC November 2008 – Demonstration to GEO Plenary

31. Successes Component registration forms completed for FDSN, CEOP, WIS In addition to WIS, forms also completed for these subsystems: –World Weather Watch Global Observing System - GOS –Global Atmosphere Watch - GAW –World Hydrological Cycle Observing System - WHYCOS –World Climate Programme - WCP –Global Climate Observing System - GCOS –Global Ocean Observing System - GOOS –Global Terrestrial Observing System - GTOS

32. Other Successes Document Successful Data Integration Projects –CEOP presentation to follow GEOSS Standards Register created –Web query form functional –ISO 29350 interface shortly Also pending –Collection of service information from the candidate systems awaits availability of prototype service registry.

33. Meeting, Presentation, Workshop At the European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly 2007 Vienna, Austria –IP3 Meeting: Monday, 15 April 2007, 10:30 – 12:00, Room SM4 –IP3 Paper: Session US10, Thursday, 19 April 2007, 11:30, Lecture Room 29 on At the International Symposium on Geosciences and Remote Sensing (IGARSS) 2007 Barcelona, Spain –GEOSS Workshop: Sunday 22 July 2007, 08:30 – 18:30 –The User and the GEOSS Architecture XIV, Topic: GEOSS Interoperability and Applications to Biodiversity

34. Meeting, Presentation, Workshop At the American Geophysics Union (AGU) Fall Meeting, 2007 San Francisco, USA –Processes for Achieving Interoperability in GEOSS, Thursday 13 December 2007, 13:30 – 15:30 At the European Geosciences Union (EGU) General Assembly 2008 Vienna, Austria –IP3 Paper: Session ESSI10, Wednesday, 17 April 2008, 14:00 - 18:00 The manuscript “Predicting the Impact of Climate Change on Biodiversity – a GEOSS scenario” was published on the Full Picture book (GEO editor) The manuscript “The GEOSS Interoperability Process Pilot Project (IP3)” was submitted to IEEE TGRS

35. Summary & Conclusions The Interoperability Process Pilot Projects are performing a vital function in GEOSS development by exercising the core GEOSS components and processes Possible only through the efforts of individuals contributing their time and expertise to the process. Input and participation from other GEO committees invited Innovative information technologies are required to fully realize potential of contributions to GEOSS The IP3 is demonstrating the benefits of engaging diverse disciplinary communities in the building of infrastructure to support interoperability

36. Extended model for Distributed Catalog service (federated architecture) –Extended functionalities Extended General Model for distribution & mediation Stateful behavior Transaction Asynchronous interaction CachingFederation of new service instances Mapping heterogeneous service modesl to the federation one Distributed Catalog Service

37. Distributed Catalog Service CSW/ISO server CSW/ISO server CSW/ebRIM FGDC server CSW/ebRIM FGDC server CSW/ebRIM CIM server CSW/ebRIM CIM server THREDDS server THREDDS server WMS server WMS server GBIF server GBIF server WCS server WCS server Resource Access CDI catalog server CDI catalog server WMS AccessWCS AccessCSW/ebRIM AccessCSW/ISO AccessTHREDDS AccessGBIF Access CDI Access