Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byChad Fowler Modified over 9 years ago
1
Air Quality and Transport Study of the Los Angeles Basin Bo Tan M.S Student Department of Atmospheric sciences University of Nevada Reno – Desert Research Institute
2
CO NO x SO x Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) Total Organic gas PM2.5 486.6 96.7 15.9 102.7 218.1 26.3 Tons per day (2010)1987 http://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/fcemssumcat_query.php 9796 889.5 113.5 2429
3
Air Quality City Smog –Industrial Emission (point source) VOC: Volatile Organic Compounds SO x : Sulfur oxides [Na 2 CO 3 (s)]: soda ash –Exhaust Emission (mobile source) CO: Carbon Monoxide [NO 2 (g)]: Nitrogen oxides [O 3 (g)]: Ozone
4
VOC production
5
Size Distribution Number of particles in Red Area of particles in dashed lines Volume of particles in dotted lines Claremont, California, August 1987
6
PM2.5
7
Health Impact with PM2.5 Sensitive Areas –Near freeway / high traffic area –Airport / harbor –Downwind from industry Sensitive Groups –Asthma / other lung diseases –Children / Older adults –Chronicle outdoor workers
8
Don’t live near freeways!!
9
2007 Statistics 6.5k premature death 1.3million school absence days 2.8million working days 1.7 million asthma patients 9000 hospitalized related to respiratory illness
10
Los Angeles Air Quality Index
11
2002 AQI
12
Current LA Emissions vs. World Emissions SOx 2002 Data is in (ug/m^3), 150 ug/m^3 per column In many countries, the Sulfur content is highly restricted fuel, and power production restrictuions Many cities stopped monitoring sulfur concentration Bottom city Guiyang, China Top City Nice, France
13
Current LA Emissions vs. World Emissions NOx 60 ug/m3 pre column Bottom city Kiev Ukraine Top city Porto, Portugal
14
Current LA Emissions vs. World Emissions O 3 200(ug/M^3) pre column L.A O 3 concentration Riverside O 3 concentration
15
Current Monitors EPA –CO –NOx –SOx – O 3 –PM 2.5 –PM 10 –Lead –Facility monitoring www.epa.gov/air/data/geosel.html AQMD –Collaboration from multi-agencies –Local –National –forecast maps –current conditions www.airnow.gov/index.cfm?action =airnow.fcsummary
16
Geography
17
L.A Ozone trend
18
Azusa Ozone trend
19
Upland Ozone trend
20
sixteen year projection with national standard
21
L.A Geography
22
Local Meteorology Initial stage Initial Mixing Development Stabilization
23
Initial Stage Stratified Atmosphere Diminishing Land breeze Start Valley breeze LAX WHIT ANAH ONT 8AM Time
24
Initial Mixing After morning traffic Initial sea breeze LAX WHIT ANAH ONT 12PM
25
Development Marine Layer propagation Max temperature contrast LAX WHIT ANAH ONT 3PM Time
26
Stabilization Marine Layer propagation Return Flow LAX WHIT ANAH ONT 5PM Time
27
Effects Wind Speed Soil Moisture Temperatures
28
Soil Moisture NGEs: Normalized gross errors, NG: normalized biases,
29
Soil Moisture Low Soil Moisture Destabilize BL Increase Mixing Decrease Pollutants Concentration High Soil Moisture Stabilize BL Decrease Mixing Increase Pollutants Concentration
30
Soil Effect Base Simulation 15% Soil Moisture 23% Soil Moisture
31
O 3 Concentration
32
Geography Hawthorne
33
CO NO x SO x Reactive Organic Gases (ROG) Total Organic gas PM2.5 486.6 96.7 15.9 102.7 218.1 26.3 Tons per day (2010)1987 http://www.arb.ca.gov/app/emsinv/fcemssumcat_query.php 9796 889.5 113.5 2429
34
Transport
36
Increasing secondary pollutants
37
Weekend Effect
38
Summary L.A air quality –Chemistry –Health effect –Historical trend –Compare to the world –Future projection L.A meteorology –Dinural evolution –Effects of primary and secondary pollutants –“ The Weekend Effect”
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.