Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAbigail Burke Modified over 9 years ago
1
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with Multiple-access Interference Ankit Misra Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur ankitm@iitk.ac.in Advisor: Dr. Harlan Russell
2
Presentation Outline Background New Network Model Simulation Results Conclusion SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI
3
Background Ad Hoc Networks Scheduling Protocols Energy to Interference-Noise Ratio (EINR) Multiple-access Interference (MAI) SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI
4
Background Ad Hoc Networks No Infrastructure Required Self-configuring Temporary Useful in Disaster Management, Military Conflicts etc. SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI
5
Background Scheduling Protocols Assigns Transmission Slots on Wireless Channel Fairness Adaptive Collision-Free
6
Background Multiple-access Interference - EINR vs. Unit Disk Model SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI TransmitterInterfererReceiver dTdT dIdI Unit Disk Model EINR based Model d I > d C EINR > β dCdC dCdC
7
Background Multiple-access Interference - EINR vs. Unit Disk Model SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI TransmitterInterfererReceiver dTdT dIdI Unit Disk Model EINR based Model d I > d C
8
Background Multiple-access Interference - EINR vs. Unit Disk Model SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI TransmitterInterfererReceiver dTdT dIdI Unit Disk Model EINR based Model d I > d C
9
New Network Model Multiple-access Interference - EINR vs. Unit Disk Model SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI TransmitterInterferer Receiver dTdT dIdI Unit Disk Model Transmission will Fail EINR based Model Transmission will Succeed d T = 0.25d C d I = 0.50d C Better Utilization using EINR based Scheduling
10
New Network Model Multiple-access Interference - EINR vs. Unit Disk Model SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI TransmitterInterfererReceiver dTdT dIdI Unit Disk Model Transmission will Succeed EINR based Model Transmission will Fail d T = 0.90d C d I = 1.50d C Collisions may occur in Unit Disk based Scheduling
11
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI New Network Model 1 32 56 7489 Unit-Disk based ScheduleEINR based Schedule
12
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI New Network Model Transmission Scheduling Protocol based on EINR model Link Status depends on MAI Scheduling Constraints based on Instantaneous Link Status Adaptive Protocol for Updating Link Status
13
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI Simulation Results Performance Metrics
14
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI Simulation Results
15
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI Simulation Results
16
SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI Conclusion Unit-Disk based Schedule is not collision-free. Unit-Disk assumption lowers the re-usage of channel. EINR based Schedule more Realistic and collision-free. EINR based Scheduling Protocol has Better Utilization.
17
Questions ? SURE 2006 Transmission Scheduling for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks with MAI
18
Thank You Acknowledgements
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.