Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
YOUR LOGO March 9, 2015 Lead Partner Mid Year Update Presentation – PPSD School Board
2
YOUR LOGO
3
Important Considerations AMO Changes Change in metrics from NECAP to STAR Transition from Paper Pencil to Technology Assessments ELA Curriculum Change to Springboard Competing Needs for Technology Hardware
4
YOUR LOGO Current Data-Driven Conclusions (2014-2015) ALL ON TRACK STAR Math Scores Math 1 st Time Credit Acquisition Accelerated Math Intervention Instructional Practices MIXED RESULTS STAR ELA Scores ELA 1 st Time Credit Acquisition Reading Plus Instructional Practices
5
YOUR LOGO
6
CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Oct. 2011: Actual Baseline Oct. 2012: Actual Oct. 2013: Actual NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 50.548.455.9 NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 243442 NECAP Math Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 3.81.95.8 MOUNT PLEASANT HIGH SCHOOL Oct. 2011: Actual Baseline Oct. 2012: Actual Oct. 2013: Actual NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 3444.944.5 NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 121424 NECAP Math Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 5.310.97.3 JSEC HIGH SCHOOL Oct. 2011: Actual Baseline Oct. 2012: Actual Oct. 2013: Actual NECAP ELA Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 42.441.751.2 NECAP Writing Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 313440 NECAP Math Proficiency Overall (11 th grade; teaching year) 6.92.35.6
7
YOUR LOGO MPHS Reading Plus The average comprehension rate for the 9 th grade is 81% The average comprehension rate for the 10 th grade is 83% 62% (142 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers 51 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading thus far this school year 35.8 is the average number of See Readers completed per student
8
YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Reading Data (Proficiency)
9
YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Reading Data MPHS Performance Measures 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual Change* STAR Reading % Below Benchmark N/A BOY: 89% MOY: 87% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 87% 2% reduction Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 86% EOY: 86% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 88% MOY: 87% 1% reduction Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 90% MOY: 85% EOY: 85% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 91% MOY: 88% 3% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 92% MOY: 90% EOY: 90% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 88% MOY: 83% 5% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 86% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 90% MOY: 88% 1% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
![YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Reading Data MPHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual Change* STAR Reading % Below Benchmark N/A BOY: 89% MOY: 87% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 87% 2% reduction Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 86% EOY: 86% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 88% MOY: 87% 1% reduction Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 90% MOY: 85% EOY: 85% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 91% MOY: 88% 3% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 92% MOY: 90% EOY: 90% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 88% MOY: 83% 5% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 86% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 90% MOY: 88% 1% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_9.jpg "YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Reading Data MPHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual Change* STAR Reading % Below Benchmark N/A BOY: 89% MOY: 87% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 87% 2% reduction Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 86% EOY: 86% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 88% MOY: 87% 1% reduction Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 90% MOY: 85% EOY: 85% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 91% MOY: 88% 3% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 92% MOY: 90% EOY: 90% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 88% MOY: 83% 5% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 86% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 90% MOY: 88% 1% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.")
10
YOUR LOGO JSEC Reading Plus The average comprehension rate for the 9 th grade is 73% The average comprehension rate for the 10 th grade is 80% 37% (89 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers 51 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading 16.6 is the average number of See Readers completed per student
11
YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Reading Data
12
YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Reading Data JSEC Performance Measures 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 N/A BOY: 89% MOY: 89% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 89% No Change Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 90% EOY: 85% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 91% MOY: 93% 2% increase Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 88% EOY: 81% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 88% 1% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 86% MOY: 89% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 86% MOY: 86% No Change Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 93% MOY: 87% EOY: 94% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 91% MOY: 90% 1% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
![YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Reading Data JSEC Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 N/A BOY: 89% MOY: 89% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 89% No Change Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 90% EOY: 85% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 91% MOY: 93% 2% increase Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 88% EOY: 81% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 88% 1% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 86% MOY: 89% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 86% MOY: 86% No Change Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 93% MOY: 87% EOY: 94% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 91% MOY: 90% 1% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_12.jpg "YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Reading Data JSEC Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 N/A BOY: 89% MOY: 89% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 89% No Change Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 90% EOY: 85% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 91% MOY: 93% 2% increase Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 88% EOY: 81% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 89% MOY: 88% 1% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 86% MOY: 89% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 86% MOY: 86% No Change Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 93% MOY: 87% EOY: 94% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 91% MOY: 90% 1% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.")
13
YOUR LOGO Central Reading Plus Data The average comprehension rate for the 9 th grade is 77% The average comprehension rate for the 10 th grade is 83% 37% (166 students) of student are currently meeting their weekly goals of completing two See Readers 230 students have already made at least 1 level gain (increased by one grade level) in their reading 38 is the average number of See Readers completed per student
14
YOUR LOGO Central STAR Reading Data
15
YOUR LOGO CHS STAR Reading Data CHS Performance Measures 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 N/A BOY: 87% MOY: 87% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 91% MOY: 87% 4% reduction Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 88% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 93% MOY: 89% 4% reduction Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 90% MOY: 90% EOY: 86% BOY – EOY: 4% reduction BOY: 90% MOY: 86% 4% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 84% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 90% MOY: 88% 2% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 83% MOY: 83% EOY: 84% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 91% MOY: 87% 4% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
![YOUR LOGO CHS STAR Reading Data CHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 N/A BOY: 87% MOY: 87% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 91% MOY: 87% 4% reduction Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 88% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 93% MOY: 89% 4% reduction Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 90% MOY: 90% EOY: 86% BOY – EOY: 4% reduction BOY: 90% MOY: 86% 4% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 84% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 90% MOY: 88% 2% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 83% MOY: 83% EOY: 84% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 91% MOY: 87% 4% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_15.jpg "YOUR LOGO CHS STAR Reading Data CHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 N/A BOY: 87% MOY: 87% EOY: 87% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 91% MOY: 87% 4% reduction Ninth GradeN/A BOY: 87% MOY: 88% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 93% MOY: 89% 4% reduction Tenth GradeN/A BOY: 90% MOY: 90% EOY: 86% BOY – EOY: 4% reduction BOY: 90% MOY: 86% 4% reduction Eleventh GradeN/A BOY: 88% MOY: 84% EOY: 88% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 90% MOY: 88% 2% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 83% MOY: 83% EOY: 84% BOY – EOY: 1% increase BOY: 91% MOY: 87% 4% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.")
16
YOUR LOGO MPHS Accelerated Math Intervention
17
YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Math Data
18
YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Math Data MPHS Performance Measures 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 66% BOY: 70% MOY: 62% EOY: 55% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 66% MOY: 62% 4% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 69% EOY: 68% BOY: 80% MOY: 72% EOY: 63% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 74% MOY: 66% 8% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 66% BOY: 64% MOY: 59% EOY: 45% BOY – EOY: 19% reduction BOY: 76% MOY: 76% No Change Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 72% EOY: 64% BOY: 68% MOY: 59% EOY: 52% BOY – EOY: 16% reduction BOY: 60% MOY: 59% 1% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 65% MOY: 55% EOY: 60% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 61% MOY: 57% 4% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
![YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Math Data MPHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 66% BOY: 70% MOY: 62% EOY: 55% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 66% MOY: 62% 4% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 69% EOY: 68% BOY: 80% MOY: 72% EOY: 63% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 74% MOY: 66% 8% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 66% BOY: 64% MOY: 59% EOY: 45% BOY – EOY: 19% reduction BOY: 76% MOY: 76% No Change Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 72% EOY: 64% BOY: 68% MOY: 59% EOY: 52% BOY – EOY: 16% reduction BOY: 60% MOY: 59% 1% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 65% MOY: 55% EOY: 60% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 61% MOY: 57% 4% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_18.jpg "YOUR LOGO MPHS STAR Math Data MPHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 66% BOY: 70% MOY: 62% EOY: 55% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 66% MOY: 62% 4% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 69% EOY: 68% BOY: 80% MOY: 72% EOY: 63% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 74% MOY: 66% 8% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 66% BOY: 64% MOY: 59% EOY: 45% BOY – EOY: 19% reduction BOY: 76% MOY: 76% No Change Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 72% EOY: 64% BOY: 68% MOY: 59% EOY: 52% BOY – EOY: 16% reduction BOY: 60% MOY: 59% 1% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 65% MOY: 55% EOY: 60% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 61% MOY: 57% 4% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.")
19
YOUR LOGO JSEC Accelerated Math Intervention
20
YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Math Data
21
YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Math Data JSEC Performance Measures 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 67% EOY: 61% BOY: 66% MOY: 63% EOY: 58% BOY – EOY: 8% reduction BOY: 68% MOY: 60% 8% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 71% EOY: 66% BOY: 79% MOY: 78% EOY: 79% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 71% MOY: 61% 10% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 63% EOY: 54% BOY: 64% MOY: 61% EOY: 59% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 75% MOY: 63% 12% reduction Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 65% EOY: 61% BOY: 59% MOY: 51% EOY: 45% BOY – EOY: 14% reduction BOY: 59% MOY: 60% 1% increase Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 62% MOY: 63% EOY: 52% BOY – EOY: 10% reduction BOY: 64% MOY: 53% 11% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
![YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Math Data JSEC Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 67% EOY: 61% BOY: 66% MOY: 63% EOY: 58% BOY – EOY: 8% reduction BOY: 68% MOY: 60% 8% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 71% EOY: 66% BOY: 79% MOY: 78% EOY: 79% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 71% MOY: 61% 10% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 63% EOY: 54% BOY: 64% MOY: 61% EOY: 59% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 75% MOY: 63% 12% reduction Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 65% EOY: 61% BOY: 59% MOY: 51% EOY: 45% BOY – EOY: 14% reduction BOY: 59% MOY: 60% 1% increase Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 62% MOY: 63% EOY: 52% BOY – EOY: 10% reduction BOY: 64% MOY: 53% 11% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_21.jpg "YOUR LOGO JSEC STAR Math Data JSEC Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 67% EOY: 61% BOY: 66% MOY: 63% EOY: 58% BOY – EOY: 8% reduction BOY: 68% MOY: 60% 8% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 71% EOY: 66% BOY: 79% MOY: 78% EOY: 79% BOY – EOY: No Change BOY: 71% MOY: 61% 10% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 63% EOY: 54% BOY: 64% MOY: 61% EOY: 59% BOY – EOY: 5% reduction BOY: 75% MOY: 63% 12% reduction Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 65% EOY: 61% BOY: 59% MOY: 51% EOY: 45% BOY – EOY: 14% reduction BOY: 59% MOY: 60% 1% increase Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 62% MOY: 63% EOY: 52% BOY – EOY: 10% reduction BOY: 64% MOY: 53% 11% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.")
22
YOUR LOGO Central Accelerated Math Intervention
23
YOUR LOGO Central STAR Math Data
24
YOUR LOGO CHS STAR Math Data CHS Performance Measures 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 67% EOY: 61% BOY: 64% MOY: 61% EOY: 62% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 65% MOY: 48% 17% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 62% BOY: 73% MOY: 66% EOY: 66% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 67% MOY: 50% 13% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 60% EOY: 55% BOY: 58% MOY: 60% EOY: 61% BOY – EOY: 3% increase BOY: 65% MOY: 48% 12% reduction Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 67% BOY: 56% MOY: 56% EOY: 53% BOY – EOY: 3% reduction BOY: 60% MOY: 44% 16% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 68% MOY: 61% EOY: 64% BOY – EOY: 4% reduction BOY: 71% MOY: 50% 21% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score “Below Benchmark” between BOY and EOY.
![YOUR LOGO CHS STAR Math Data CHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 67% EOY: 61% BOY: 64% MOY: 61% EOY: 62% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 65% MOY: 48% 17% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 62% BOY: 73% MOY: 66% EOY: 66% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 67% MOY: 50% 13% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 60% EOY: 55% BOY: 58% MOY: 60% EOY: 61% BOY – EOY: 3% increase BOY: 65% MOY: 48% 12% reduction Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 67% BOY: 56% MOY: 56% EOY: 53% BOY – EOY: 3% reduction BOY: 60% MOY: 44% 16% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 68% MOY: 61% EOY: 64% BOY – EOY: 4% reduction BOY: 71% MOY: 50% 21% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_24.jpg "YOUR LOGO CHS STAR Math Data CHS Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] STAR Math % Below Benchmark 5 BOY: N/A MOY: 67% EOY: 61% BOY: 64% MOY: 61% EOY: 62% BOY – EOY: 2% reduction BOY: 65% MOY: 48% 17% reduction Ninth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 62% BOY: 73% MOY: 66% EOY: 66% BOY – EOY: 7% reduction BOY: 67% MOY: 50% 13% reduction Tenth Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 60% EOY: 55% BOY: 58% MOY: 60% EOY: 61% BOY – EOY: 3% increase BOY: 65% MOY: 48% 12% reduction Eleventh Grade BOY: N/A MOY: 70% EOY: 67% BOY: 56% MOY: 56% EOY: 53% BOY – EOY: 3% reduction BOY: 60% MOY: 44% 16% reduction Twelfth GradeN/A BOY: 68% MOY: 61% EOY: 64% BOY – EOY: 4% reduction BOY: 71% MOY: 50% 21% reduction *Target growth rate for STAR is a minimum of a 7% reduction in students that score Below Benchmark between BOY and EOY.")
25
YOUR LOGO
26
MPHS Student Leading Indicators Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks Performance Measures 2011-2012 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Current [Target] Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4% [84%] 88.3% [85%] 85.5% [86%] Chronic- Excessive Absence Rate ** 57.1% 49.0% [55.1%] 42.0% [53.1%] 42.4% [51.1%] Out-of-School Suspensions ** 188164129 102 [94] *Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014. ** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.
![MPHS Student Leading Indicators Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Current [Target] Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4% [84%] 88.3% [85%] 85.5% [86%] Chronic- Excessive Absence Rate ** 57.1% 49.0% [55.1%] 42.0% [53.1%] 42.4% [51.1%] Out-of-School Suspensions ** [94] *Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_26.jpg "** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/")
27
YOUR LOGO MPHS 1 st Time Credit Acquisition JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks First Time Credit Acquisition Rate 2011-2012 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Projected* Algebra I52% (62/119)68% (110/161) 77% (170/222) 71.9% Geometry78% (122/156)86% (179/209) 84% (84/100)75.4% Intro to Literature 80% (117/146)87% (223/257) 90%(129/144)86.0% World Literature81% (224/277)86% (124/145) 89% (196/220)77.6% *2014-2015 rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit. The goal for 2014-2015 is 80%. Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition.
![YOUR LOGO MPHS 1 st Time Credit Acquisition JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks First Time Credit Acquisition Rate Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Projected* Algebra I52% (62/119)68% (110/161) 77% (170/222) 71.9% Geometry78% (122/156)86% (179/209) 84% (84/100)75.4% Intro to Literature 80% (117/146)87% (223/257) 90%(129/144)86.0% World Literature81% (224/277)86% (124/145) 89% (196/220)77.6% * rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_27.jpg "The goal for is 80%. Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition..")
28
YOUR LOGO JSEC Student Leading Indicators Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks Performance Measures 2011-2012 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Actual [Target] Student Attendance Data 1 82.8% 83.8% [84%] 82.7% [85%] 83.2% [86%] Chronic- Excessive Absence Rate 2 56.8% 59.7% [53.8%] 59.7% [50.8%] 50.5% [47.8%] Out-of-School Suspensions 3 389235330 125 [194] *Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014. ** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.
![YOUR LOGO JSEC Student Leading Indicators Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Target] Student Attendance Data % 83.8% [84%] 82.7% [85%] 83.2% [86%] Chronic- Excessive Absence Rate % 59.7% [53.8%] 59.7% [50.8%] 50.5% [47.8%] Out-of-School Suspensions [194] *Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_28.jpg "** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/")
29
YOUR LOGO JSEC 1 st Time Credit Acquisition JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks First Time Credit Acquisition Rate 2011-2012 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Projected* Algebra I61% (71/116)53% (105/199) 75% (81/108) 75% Geometry76% (96/127)74% (139/189) 79% (88/111) 73% Intro to Literature 79% (131/166)72% (136/190) 77% (75/97) 77% World Literature80% (176/220)80% (111/138) 83% (114/137) 92% *2014-2015 rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit. The goal for 2014-2015 is 80%. Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition.
![YOUR LOGO JSEC 1 st Time Credit Acquisition JSEC Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks First Time Credit Acquisition Rate Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Projected* Algebra I61% (71/116)53% (105/199) 75% (81/108) 75% Geometry76% (96/127)74% (139/189) 79% (88/111) 73% Intro to Literature 79% (131/166)72% (136/190) 77% (75/97) 77% World Literature80% (176/220)80% (111/138) 83% (114/137) 92% * rate shown is the percentage of those students projected to attain first time credit.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_29.jpg "The goal for is 80%. Unit Recovery has commenced to accelerate first time credit acquisition..")
30
YOUR LOGO CHS Student Leading Indicators Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks Performance Measures 2011-2012 2012-2013 Actual [Benchmark] 2013-2014 Actual [Benchmark] 2014-2015 Current [Target] Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4% [84%] 88.3% [85%] 85.5% [86%] Chronic- Excessive Absence Rate ** 57.1% 49.0% [55.1%] 42.0% [53.1%] 42.4% [51.1%] Out-of-School Suspensions ** 188164129 102 [94] *Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014. ** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/2014.
![YOUR LOGO CHS Student Leading Indicators Leading Indicators Baseline DataPerformance Benchmarks Performance Measures Actual [Benchmark] Actual [Benchmark] Current [Target] Student Attendance Data* 82.9% 87.4% [84%] 88.3% [85%] 85.5% [86%] Chronic- Excessive Absence Rate ** 57.1% 49.0% [55.1%] 42.0% [53.1%] 42.4% [51.1%] Out-of-School Suspensions ** [94] *Student Attendance is for ALL students thus includes those students that enroll AFTER the contractually inclusive (Lead Partner Metrics) date of 9/19/2014.](http://images.slideplayer.com./24/7431612/slides/slide_30.jpg "** Chronic Absences and Out-of-School Suspensions include ONLY those students that fall within the contractual inclusion date of enrollment by 9/19/")
31
YOUR LOGO
32
MPHS ELA Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
33
YOUR LOGO MPHS ELA Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
34
YOUR LOGO MPHS Math Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
35
YOUR LOGO MPHS Math Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
36
YOUR LOGO JSEC ELA Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
37
YOUR LOGO JSEC ELA Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
38
YOUR LOGO JSEC Math Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
39
YOUR LOGO JSEC Math Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
40
YOUR LOGO Central ELA Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
41
YOUR LOGO Central ELA Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
42
YOUR LOGO Central Math Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
43
YOUR LOGO Central Math Instructional Practice Implementation Teacher Proficient in Two or More Look Fors Teacher Proficient in One Look For Teacher Proficient in None of the Look Fors
44
YOUR LOGO
45
Scope of Work Transfer Process Common Core Aligned Professional Development Common Formative and Summative Assessments Digital Intervention Implementation Literacy Across the Curriculum (Tri- School Initiative) Teacher Leader Development Administrator Development
46
YOUR LOGO Sustainability Timeline: A Modular Approach Module 1 Director Models Scope Implementation September 24 th Module 2 Director and Teacher Leader Co-Lead/Develop November 19 th Module 3 Teacher Leader leads, Director Supports and Collaborates February 4 th Module 4 Teacher Leaders leads, Director Provides Feedback April 8 th
47
YOUR LOGO A Closer Look: Professional Development M1 Director develops the presentation with Teacher Leader feedback. Director presents majority, Teacher Leader presents minority. M2 Director and Teacher Leader co-develop the outline and presentation. Teacher Leader presents majority, Director presents the minority. M3 Teacher Leader develops the outline with Director feedback. Teacher Leader leads the presentation of the Anchor Standard/ SMP. M4 Teacher Leader implements the entire standard independently, from outline to CPT presentation.
48
YOUR LOGO
49
Each Teacher Leader and Tri-School Math and ELA Department has a different trajectory Therefore – each department and Teacher Leader has a differentiated support plan
50
YOUR LOGO 9 Teacher Leaders 3 ELA TLs3 ELL TLs3 Math TLs
51
YOUR LOGO OTI Report: Lead Partner Strengths JSEC + ELP showed great responsiveness to school requests Teachers appreciated structured approach for developing Common Assessments MPHS + Stakeholders recognized ELP staff for ability to provide good introductory PD Teachers communicated appreciation for the instructional focus and pacing provided by ELP CHS + School recognized ELP’s ability to provide strong math and ELA professional development Stakeholders appreciated the new strategies and topics covered during Summer ILT meetings.
52
YOUR LOGO OTI Report: Lead Partner Opportunities JSEC Δ Request for more coaching in classrooms Request for more planning time for CCSS implementation MPHS Δ Request for more coaching in classrooms Request for more support with capacity development for presentation development CHS Δ Expressed readiness for independence with professional development No additional classroom coaching support requested for Math or ELA
53
YOUR LOGO Customized Phase Out Approach (2015) School Needs OTI Findings Custom ELP Phase Out PlanJSEC ELP Phase Out: June 18 th Modules Three & Four Co-Led by ELP & School MPHS ELP Phase Out: June 18 th Modules Three & Four Co-Led by ELP & School CHS ELP Phase Out: January 30 th Modules Three & Four to be Led by School
54
YOUR LOGO
55
Enhanced Coaching Program PURPOSE Reinforce content area standards already trained last year and this year (i.e. content area maintenance) Train and support teachers in their first year with the Tri-Schools Bolster support with relevant ELL and SPED strategies Enhance the sustainability of training already implemented
56
YOUR LOGO Standards to be Maintenance Coached Mathematics SMP #1 SMP #4 SMP #6 ELA/ELL Anchor Standard 1 Anchor Standard 2 These standards will be implemented progressively. Teachers will be coached one standard at a time to maximize focus and attention. Coaching progress will be tracked and monitored via Look Fors.
57
YOUR LOGO PARCC testing will consume technology, time, and manpower. Lead Partner will support with scheduling and other logistics. Through SUSTAINABILITY, Teacher Leaders now drive transformation.
58
YOUR LOGO TextText
Similar presentations
