1. HE students & ethnicity: Triangulation of qualitative and quantitative funded research programs Mary Stuart, Kingston University Catherine Lido, Thames Valley University Jessica Morgan, University of Greenwich Promoting equity in Higher education

2. MEGs in UK HE Students from MEGs face barriers in terms of HE experiences & outcomes (e.g. Stuart, 2006; Reay et al, 2001) Student satisfaction (e.g. Surridge, 2006) Degree attainment (e.g. Richardson 2008) Alienation/ ‘fitting in’ (Connor et al., 2004)

3. Previous HEA Funded Research WP in PG Education: Identifying Barriers & Creating Success (Stuart, Lido, Morgan, Solomon & Ackroyd, 2008) N=1,073; 2 Southeast HEIs in UK MEG students highest in PG Intentions, but also… Debt worry, actual debt & lower in Family HE experience Student Diversity, Extracurricular Activities and Perceptions of Graduate Outcomes (Stuart, Lido, Morgan & May, 2009) N=749; 4 diverse HEIs Demographic patterns of participation in ECAs

4. MEG activity differences White students do more of this: –See friends (p<.01) –Visit pubs and bars (p<.01) –Visit shops and cafes (p<.05) Black students do more of this: –Visit the library (p<.01) –Pray (p<.01) & See family (p<.05) –Meet NEW friends on social-websites (p<.01) –Have paid employment (p<.01) Asian Students are doing more of this: –Visit the library (p<.05) –Attend Uni clubs & societies (p<.01) –Pray (p<.01) & See family (p<.01) & Volunteer (p<.01)

5. Cultural Capital Thinking more critically about the whole student experience… Forms of knowledge, skills, attitudes, expectations (Bourdieu, 1979) Social capital (Field, 2005) Make environments, such as HE, comfortable/ familiar Institutional habitus (McDonough, 1996) Which affects success…

6. SIT Social Identity Theory (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) In-group Affiliation= Self-esteem needs and Positive Distinctiveness ‘Identity threat’ (HE environment) In-group identification (university and peers)= Also key for success?

7. Project Method Phase 1: Large scale survey (n=766) Distributed in lectures to 2 nd years @ 4 HEIs: 2 London post-92 Unis; 1960’s S.E England Uni; London Specialist Medical Institution. Phase 2: Qualitative analysis(n=54) Student Focus groups x 10 (n=46) Educational Life History Interviews (n=8) Phase 3: Follow-up: 2 nd year exam results(n=26)

8. Adapted Measures Demographic factors Academic self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1965) Well-being at university (Speilberger, 1970) Peer Support (Jessop et al., 2005) Marks (self-report actual & expected ; r=.46, p<.01) Comfort Zone (α=.71) University Identification (α =.86) New Measures

9. Quantitative Regression findings Uni ID & Comfort Zone = key predictors for all students’ positive Uni experience (r 2 from.12 -.37) Predict Black & White students’ marks (r 2 =.03;.05) Comfort Zone more important for MEGs’ positive experience/ outcomes Uni ID more important for White students’ positive experience/ outcomes

10. Regression models predicting Marks WHITEBLACK Predictors: UniID (β).11*- Comfort Zone (β).13*.21* Variance explained 4%6% R2R2.03.05 Model p value p<.001p<.05

11. Regression models predicting Academic Self-esteem WHITEBLACKASIANARAB/ PERSIAN Predictors: UniID (β).34***.17*.18*- Comfort Zone (β).20***.43***.40***.53* Variance explained 20%30%24%26% R2R2.19.29.23.20 Model p value p<.001 p<.05

12. Further ethnic group differences Black students More Academic Self-esteem than white peers (p<.01) Less peer support than all other ethnic groups (p<.01) Asian students Less well-being at university than white peers (p<.001) Less well-being & lower marks for Asian females (p<.01) Mixed Race students Less comfort zone than all other ethnic groups (p<.05) Less UniID than all other minority ethnic groups All MEG students (particularly Arab/ Persian) Less comfort zone for lower SES students (p<.05)

13. Educational Life History Interviews Ethnic minority students: Missing out on many benefits of social capital at University (academic and social) Compounded by early educational experiences, SES, age and gender Preference for individual study (e.g. not group work) Less awareness and uptake of available support from their peers, teachers and HEIs

14. ‘Majdy’, Medical Student, Specialist Institution I always worked alone at school as I was one of the few nerdy kids, and the teachers left us alone The careers advisor said medicine would be too difficult to get into considering the area and the school I was from I prefer working alone at Uni as that’s just what I’m used to from school. I’m used to no one else being interested in what I’m doing. I’m worried that I’m not revising thoroughly enough and I should go and speak with someone but I'm not sure who.

15. White students: More supportive early educational environments Compounded by SES & family HE experience Expectations of collaborative & supported learning Stronger social network at University More confident to seek out extra help and support from peers, teachers and HEIs

16. I’ll always go to my friends for help first, and then a group of us will go and approach the teacher together if we’re still stuck. Problems are usually best sorted out this way. [‘Lauren’, Maths, 1960’s University] When the workload’s bad we divide it up and help each other as a matter of survival, you have to. [‘Hugh’, Engineering, Post ’92 University]

17. Summary of Projects’ Findings Demographic group differences emerge in Students’ educational experiences (early & HE): Focus on study vs. friendship at Uni Knowledge & uptake of peer, teacher & Uni support. Comfort zone & Identification matter for success for all! Students who aren’t comfortable on campus are at risk (e.g. Mixed-race students) “University for study ” disadvantage?

18. Any thoughts?