1. Towards Multi-view Feature-Based Configuration Jorn Moret [ID3510085 – Group 3] J.G.Moret@students.uu.nl 4/10/2013

2.  Authors  Main concepts  PDD  Example  Related literature 2

3.  Arnaud Hubaux (Former Postdoc at University of Namur)  Patrick Heymans (Professor at University of Namur)  Pierre-Yves Schobbens (Professor at University of Namur)  Dirk Deridder (Former postdoc at Vrije Universiteit Brussel ) 3

4.  Software product line (SPL)  Feature diagram  Feature-based configuration (FBC)  Visualize constraints:  Extending feature diagrams with multiple ‘views’  Visualizations  Greyed  Pruned  Collapsed 4

5.  Software product line (SPL)  Feature diagram  Feature-based configuration (FBC)  Visualize constraints:  Extending feature diagrams with multiple ‘views’  Visualizations  Greyed  Pruned  Collapsed 5

6.  Software product line (SPL)  Feature diagram  Feature-based configuration (FBC)  Visualize constraints:  Extending feature diagrams with multiple ‘views’  Visualizations  Greyed  Pruned  Collapsed 6

7.  Software product line (SPL)  Feature diagram  Feature-based configuration (FBC)  Lack of tailoring towards specific concern  Visualize constraints:  Extending feature diagrams with multiple ‘views’  Visualizations  Greyed  Pruned  Collapsed 7

8.  Software product line (SPL)  Feature diagram  Feature-based configuration (FBC)  Visualize constraints:  Extending feature diagrams with multiple ‘views’  Visualizations  Greyed  Pruned  Collapsed Manufacturer Customer Government 8

9.  Software product line (SPL)  Feature diagram  Feature-based configuration (FBC)  Visualize constraints:  Extending feature diagrams with multiple ‘views’  Visualizations  Greyed  Pruned  Collapsed 9

10. 10

11.  Decide upon concerns 1.Car Manufacturer 2.Customer 3.Government 11

12.  Allocate views 1.Car Manufacturer:  Engine, Transmission, Performance, Directives 2.Customer:  Gas, Electric, Manual, Automatic, 180Hp, 240Hp 3.Government:  Weight, CO2 emission 12

13. Manufacturer  Apply views 1.Car Manufacturer:  Engine, Transmission, Performance, Directives 2.Customer:  Gas, Electric, Manual, Automatic, 180Hp, 240Hp 3.Government:  Weight, CO2 emission 13

14. Manufacturer Customer  Apply views 1.Car Manufacturer:  Engine, Transmission, Performance, Directives 2.Customer:  Gas, Electric, Manual, Automatic, 180Hp, 240Hp 3.Government:  Weight, CO2 emission 14

15. Manufacturer Customer Government  Apply views 1.Car Manufacturer:  Engine, Transmission, Performance, Directives 2.Customer:  Gas, Electric, Manual, Automatic, 180Hp, 240Hp 3.Government:  Weight, CO2 emission 15

16.  Check view coverage  No overlooked features?  Feature not part of a view  inferred from others? Manufacturer Customer Government 16

17. Manufacturer Customer Government  Check view interactions  Feature selection dependency 17

18. Manufacturer Customer Government  Create visualizations: 18

19. Manufacturer Customer Government  Decide upon visible features 19

20.  Feature modeling  First introduced by Kang et al. (1990)  FDs origins from SPL  Car manufacturers in the 80s  Rosenmüller et al. (2011)  Use of seperate FDs for each dimension  Similar method by Zhao et al. (2008)  But applied to classic FDs 20

21. ? Questions 21