1. The FERC Review Process and The Importance of Safe Pipeline and LNG Terminal Operation NASFM Annual Meeting- July 8, 2005 Office of Energy Projects Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

2. FERC 2 Who is FERC? Independent Regulatory Commission Five members –Appointed by the President –Confirmed by the Senate

3. FERC 3 Natural gas – a critical source of energy and raw material Vital to the US Economy ¼ of U.S. energy requirements environmental fuel of Choice and regulation provides about 19% of electric generation residential customers --60 million in 2001 U.S. industries- over 40% of all primary energy Industrial consumption, up by almost 48% from 1986 to 2001. Increase continues….. Production U.S. lower-48 and non-Arctic Canada flat to declining, LNG and Arctic gas will become the major supply source, providing 20-25% of U.S. demand by 2025. And lastly……..

4. FERC 4 Over 90 percent of the 185 GW of new electric generation since June 2001 is natural gas Source: Derived from Platts POWERmap

5. FERC 5 Safety?– How Important? Essential Prevention is Possible Compliance –Design Standards & Review –No Dig Rules –Testing and Repair Rules Inspection

6. 28 CONSTRUCTED A. Everett, MA : 1.035 Bcfd (Tractebel - DOMAC) B. Cove Point, MD : 1.0 Bcfd (Dominion - Cove Point LNG) C. Elba Island, GA : 0.68 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG) D. Lake Charles, LA : 1.0 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) E. Gulf of Mexico: 0.5 Bcfd, (Gulf Gateway Energy Bridge - Excelerate Energy) APPROVED BY FERC 1. Lake Charles, LA: 1.1 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) 2. Hackberry, LA : 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy) 3. Bahamas : 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express)* 4. Bahamas : 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel)* 5. Freeport, TX : 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev.) 6. Sabine, LA : 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG) 7. Elba Island, GA: 0.54 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG) 8. Corpus Christi, TX: 2.6 Bcfd, (Cheniere LNG) 9. Corpus Christi, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil) 10. Fall River, MA : 0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG) 11. Sabine, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass - ExxonMobil) APPROVED BY MARAD/COAST GUARD 12. Port Pelican: 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 13. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing - Shell) CANADIAN APPROVED TERMINALS 14. St. John, NB : 1.0 Bcfd, (Canaport - Irving Oil) 15. Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG - Anadarko) MEXICAN APPROVED TERMINALS 16. Altamira, Tamulipas : 0.7 Bcfd, (Shell/Total/Mitsui) 17. Baja California, MX : 1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra & Shell) 18. Baja California - Offshore : 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) PROPOSED TO FERC 19. Long Beach, CA : 0.7 Bcfd, (Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips - Sound Energy Solutions) 20. Logan Township, NJ : 1.2 Bcfd (Crown Landing LNG - BP) 21. Bahamas : 0.5 Bcfd, (Seafarer - El Paso/FPL ) 22. Corpus Christi, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Ingleside Energy - Occidental Energy Ventures) 23. Port Arthur, TX: 1.5 Bcfd (Sempra) 24. Cove Point, MD : 0.8 Bcfd (Dominion) 25. LI Sound, NY: 1.0 Bcfd (Broadwater Energy - TransCanada/Shell) 26. Pascagoula, MS: 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf LNG Energy LLC) 27. Bradwood, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Northern Star LNG - Northern Star Natural Gas LLC) 28. Pascagoula, MS: 1.3 Bcfd (Casotte Landing - ChevronTexaco) 29. Cameron, LA: 3.3 Bcfd (Creole Trail LNG - Cheniere LNG) 30. Port Lavaca, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Calhoun LNG - Gulf Coast LNG Partners) 31. Freeport, TX: 2.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev. - Expansion) PROPOSED TO MARAD/COAST GUARD 33. California Offshore: 1.5 Bcfd (Cabrillo Port - BHP Billiton) 33. So. California Offshore : 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal Energy) 34. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Main Pass McMoRan Exp.) 35. Gulf of Mexico: 1.0 Bcfd (Compass Port - ConocoPhillips) 36. Gulf of Mexico: 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing - ExxonMobil) 37. Gulf of Mexico: 1.5 Bcfd (Beacon Port Clean Energy Terminal - ConocoPhillips) 38. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.4 Bcfd (Neptune LNG - Tractebel) 39. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.8 Bcfd (Northeast Gateway - Excelerate Energy) Existing and Proposed North American LNG Terminals As of June 30, 2005 FERC Office of Energy Projects A 3 4 21 32 19 34 33 13 23 B 1 24 35 22 US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard * US pipeline approved; LNG terminal pending in Bahamas 26 10 25 20 29 7 C 2 D 11 23 36 37 12 5,31 9 6 38 27 E 14 16 15 17 18 30 39 8

7. POTENTIAL U.S. SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 40. Coos Bay, OR: 0.13 Bcfd, (Energy Projects Development) 41. Somerset, MA: 0.65 Bcfd (Somerset LNG) 42. California - Offshore: 0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 43. Pleasant Point, ME : 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC) 44. St. Helens, OR: 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC) 45. Galveston, TX: 1.2 Bcfd (Pelican Island - BP) 46. Philadelphia, PA: 0.6 Bcfd (Freedom Energy Center - PGW) 47. Astoria, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Skipanon LNG - Calpine) POTENTIAL CANADIAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 48. Quebec City, QC : 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz Met/Gaz de France) 49. Rivière-du- Loup, QC: 0.5 Bcfd (Cacouna Energy - TransCanada/PetroCanada) 50. Kitimat, BC: 0.61 Bcfd (Galveston LNG) 51. Prince Rupert, BC: 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac Terminals) 52. Goldboro, NS 1.0 Bcfd (Keltic Petrochemicals) POTENTIAL MEXICAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 53. Lázaro Cárdenas, MX : 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol) 54. Puerto Libertad, MX: 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific LNG) 55. Offshore Gulf, MX: 1.0 Bcfd (Dorado - Tidelands) 56. Manzanillo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd 57. Topolobampo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd Potential North American LNG Terminals As of June 30, 2005 FERC Office of Energy Projects 43 42 40 US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard 41 46 45 44 47 55 48 49 51 50 52 53 54 56 57

8. FERC 8 LNG Review Process Notice of Application Interventions/ Protests Notice of Intent Scoping Meeting / Site Visit Data Requests, Analysis & Agency Coordination Issue DEIS Public Meeting / Comments Issue FEIS Authorization / Denial Safety & Engineering Cryogenic Design & Safety Review Technical Conference Waterway Suitability Assessment Waterway Suitability Report USCG Letter of Recommendation (issued independently)

9. FERC 9 Pre-Filing Process – Increased Public Involvement More interactive NEPA/permitting process, no shortcuts Earlier, more direct interaction between FERC, other agencies, landowners Time savings realized only if we are working together with stakeholders FERC/Agency staff are advocates of the Process, not the Project! Goal of “no surprises”

10. FERC 10 Timelines: Traditional vs. Pre-Filing Process Announce Open Season Announce Open Season Develop Study Corridor Develop Study Corridor Approve PF Request, Conduct Scoping Conduct Scoping 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Review Draft Resource Reports & Prepare DEIS Issue Draft EIS Issue Draft EIS File At FERC Issue Order Issue Order File At FERC Prepare Resource Reports Prepare Resource Reports Issue Final EIS Issue Final EIS Traditional - Applicant Traditional - FERC NEPA Pre-Filing - Applicant NEPA Pre-Filing - FERC Application Complete (months)

11. FERC 11 Opportunities for Public Involvement The FERC Process: Issue Notice of the Application Project Sponsor Sends Landowner Notification Package Issue Notice of Intent to Prepare the NEPA Document (i.e., scoping) Hold Scoping Meetings Public Input: File an Intervention; register for e- subscription Contact the project sponsor w/questions, concerns; contact FERC Send letters expressing concerns about environmental impact Attend scoping meetings

12. FERC 12 Opportunities for Public Involvement The FERC Process: Issue Notice of Availability of the DEIS Hold Public Meetings on DEIS Issue a Commission Order Public Input: File comments on the adequacy of DEIS Attend public meetings to give comments on DEIS Interveners can file a request for Rehearing of a Commission Order

13. FERC 13 Interagency Agreements Agreement for Environmental Review of Natural Gas Facilities Signed May 2002 Signed by 10 Federal agencies with jurisdiction or expertise Establishes FERC as lead agency for environmental review Ensures early participation and cooperation Work with schedule set by FERC

14. FERC 14 Interagency Agreements Agreement for LNG Safety and Security Signed January 2004 by FERC, USCG, DOT Defines roles and responsibilities Establishes FERC as lead for environmental review Stresses coordination, seamless review Coordination continues from initial review through construction and operation Includes terminal facilities and ships

15. FERC 15 FERC Office of Energy Projects Onshore Facility Safety Compliance with 49 CFR Part 193 and NFPA 59A Cryogenic Design and Technical Review – Report 13 Exclusion Zones – Thermal Radiation and Flammable Vapor Seismic design review

16. FERC 16 Thermal Exclusion Zones FERC Office of Energy Projects

17. FERC 17 Flammable Vapor Exclusion Zone FERC Office of Energy Projects

18. FERC 18 FERC Office of Energy Projects Cryogenic Design Review Process Flow and Material Balance Piping and Instrumentation Diagrams LNG Storage Tank Design Hazard Detection and Emergency Shutdown Systems Hazard Control – Fire Water, Dry Chemical, High Expansion Foam Technical Conference

19. FERC 19 FERC Office of Energy Projects Marine Traffic and Vessel Safety Compliance with 33 CFR Part 127 Letter of Intent to initiate U.S. Coast Guard Letter of Recommendation June 2005 NVIC Marine Safety Analysis – Thermal Radiation and Flammable Vapor Hazards Vessel Traffic Congestion

20. FERC 20 FERC Office of Energy Projects Spill rates from cargo tank holes Spread of unconfined pool on water Vapor generation from spills on water Thermal radiation from fires Flammable vapor dispersion ABSG Report – Models for Calculating Site-Specific Hazards

21. FERC 21 FERC Office of Energy Projects Accidental breach scenario conclusions: Groundings and low speed collisions - no cargo spill High speed collisions - 0.5 to 1.5 m2 cargo tank hole Intentional breach scenario conclusions: Cargo tanks holes range from 2 to 12 m2 Nominal tank hole size of 5 – 7 m2 Sandia Report – Cargo Tank Breach Analysis

22. FERC 22 FERC Office of Energy Projects Zone 1 - significant impacts to public safety / property within 500 meters (1,640 feet) due to thermal hazards from a fire. Zone 2 – transition to less severe thermal hazard levels to public safety / property - 500 to 1,600 meters. Zone 3 - lower public health and safety impacts beyond 1,600 meters (5,250 feet). Large, unignited LNG vapor cloud unlikely, but could extend to 2,500 meters (8,200 feet). Sandia Report – General Hazard Analysis

23. FERC 23 FERC Office of Energy Projects Cargo hole sizes/scenarios - Sandia Report Site-specific hazard calculations - ABSG Report Risk-based management options - Sandia Report Application of ABSG and Sandia Reports to LNG Project Review

24. FERC 24 FERC Office of Energy Projects LNG Release and Spread Hole Area0.8 meters 2 5 meters 2 7 meters 2 12 meters 2 Hole Diameter1.0 meter2.5 meters3.0 meters3.9 meters Spill Time94 minutes15 minutes10.6 minutes6.1 minutes Pool Fire Calculations Maximum Pool Radius 340 feet817 feet935 feet1,103 feet Fire Duration94 minutes15 minutes10.8 minutes6.5 minutes Distance to: 1,600 BTU/ft2-hr2,200 feet4,340 feet4,810 feet5,476 feet 3,000 BTU/ft2-hr1,710 feet3,330 feet3,701 feet4,206 feet 10,000 BTU/ft2-hr1,040 feet1,970 feet2,174 feet2,459 feet Site-Specific Hazard Calculations

25. FERC 25 FERC Office of Energy Projects NVIC (June 14, 2005) Waterway Suitability Assessment (WSA) Validation of WSA through Port Committees (i.e. – Area Maritime Security Committee) Waterway Suitability Report for DEIS Security Resource Requirements for DEIS Letter of Recommendation follows FEIS

26. FERC 26 Company files monthly progress reports during construction. Review of final design and changes by FERC. Clearances for design/construction changes by Director of OEP. Site inspections by FERC during major construction activity. Authorization to commence service from Director of OEP. Oversight of Construction

27. FERC 27 Reporting Requirements: Semi-annual reports of plant activities, maintenance, and problems Immediate notification of serious accidents Operating Inspections: Inspect condition of all major plant equipment Review plant operations; maintenance Review changes in design; operations; safety systems Inspect security measures Update Cryogenic Design and Inspection Manual Monitoring Operations

28. FERC 28 Opportunities For Fire Officials Public Notices/Meetings Cryogenic Design Reviews NVIC Emergency Response Plans LNG Pilot Program Pre-Filing Consultations _______________________

29. FERC 29 28 CONSTRUCTED A. Everett, MA : 1.035 Bcfd (Tractebel - DOMAC) B. Cove Point, MD : 1.0 Bcfd (Dominion - Cove Point LNG) C. Elba Island, GA : 0.68 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG) D. Lake Charles, LA : 1.0 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) E. Gulf of Mexico: 0.5 Bcfd, (Gulf Gateway Energy Bridge - Excelerate Energy) APPROVED BY FERC 1. Lake Charles, LA: 1.1 Bcfd (Southern Union - Trunkline LNG) 2. Hackberry, LA : 1.5 Bcfd, (Sempra Energy) 3. Bahamas : 0.84 Bcfd, (AES Ocean Express)* 4. Bahamas : 0.83 Bcfd, (Calypso Tractebel)* 5. Freeport, TX : 1.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev.) 6. Sabine, LA : 2.6 Bcfd (Cheniere LNG) 7. Elba Island, GA: 0.54 Bcfd (El Paso - Southern LNG) 8. Corpus Christi, TX: 2.6 Bcfd, (Cheniere LNG) 9. Corpus Christi, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Vista Del Sol - ExxonMobil) 10. Fall River, MA : 0.8 Bcfd, (Weaver's Cove Energy/Hess LNG) 11. Sabine, TX : 1.0 Bcfd (Golden Pass - ExxonMobil) APPROVED BY MARAD/COAST GUARD 12. Port Pelican: 1.6 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 13. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf Landing - Shell) CANADIAN APPROVED TERMINALS 14. St. John, NB : 1.0 Bcfd, (Canaport - Irving Oil) 15. Point Tupper, NS 1.0 Bcf/d (Bear Head LNG - Anadarko) MEXICAN APPROVED TERMINALS 16. Altamira, Tamulipas : 0.7 Bcfd, (Shell/Total/Mitsui) 17. Baja California, MX : 1.0 Bcfd, (Sempra & Shell) 18. Baja California - Offshore : 1.4 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) PROPOSED TO FERC 19. Long Beach, CA : 0.7 Bcfd, (Mitsubishi/ConocoPhillips - Sound Energy Solutions) 20. Logan Township, NJ : 1.2 Bcfd (Crown Landing LNG - BP) 21. Bahamas : 0.5 Bcfd, (Seafarer - El Paso/FPL ) 22. Corpus Christi, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Ingleside Energy - Occidental Energy Ventures) 23. Port Arthur, TX: 1.5 Bcfd (Sempra) 24. Cove Point, MD : 0.8 Bcfd (Dominion) 25. LI Sound, NY: 1.0 Bcfd (Broadwater Energy - TransCanada/Shell) 26. Pascagoula, MS: 1.0 Bcfd (Gulf LNG Energy LLC) 27. Bradwood, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Northern Star LNG - Northern Star Natural Gas LLC) 28. Pascagoula, MS: 1.3 Bcfd (Casotte Landing - ChevronTexaco) 29. Cameron, LA: 3.3 Bcfd (Creole Trail LNG - Cheniere LNG) 30. Port Lavaca, TX: 1.0 Bcfd (Calhoun LNG - Gulf Coast LNG Partners) 31. Freeport, TX: 2.5 Bcfd, (Cheniere/Freeport LNG Dev. - Expansion) PROPOSED TO MARAD/COAST GUARD 32. California Offshore: 1.5 Bcfd (Cabrillo Port - BHP Billiton) 33. So. California Offshore : 0.5 Bcfd, (Crystal Energy) 34. Louisiana Offshore : 1.0 Bcfd (Main Pass McMoRan Exp.) 35. Gulf of Mexico: 1.0 Bcfd (Compass Port - ConocoPhillips) 36. Gulf of Mexico: 2.8 Bcfd (Pearl Crossing - ExxonMobil) 37. Gulf of Mexico: 1.5 Bcfd (Beacon Port Clean Energy Terminal - ConocoPhillips) 38. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.4 Bcfd (Neptune LNG - Tractebel) 39. Offshore Boston, MA: 0.8 Bcfd (Northeast Gateway - Excelerate Energy) Existing and Proposed North American LNG Terminals As of July 1, 2005 FERC Office of Energy Projects A 3 4 21 32 19 34 33 13 23 B 1 24 35 US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard * US pipeline approved; LNG terminal pending in Bahamas 26 10 25 20 29 7 C 2 D 11 23 36 37 12 5,31 9 6 38 27 E 14 16 15 17 18 39 8 22 30

30. FERC 30 POTENTIAL U.S. SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 40. Coos Bay, OR: 0.13 Bcfd, (Energy Projects Development) 41. Somerset, MA: 0.65 Bcfd (Somerset LNG) 42. California - Offshore: 0.75 Bcfd, (Chevron Texaco) 43. Pleasant Point, ME : 0.5 Bcf/d (Quoddy Bay, LLC) 44. St. Helens, OR: 0.7 Bcfd (Port Westward LNG LLC) 45. Galveston, TX: 1.2 Bcfd (Pelican Island - BP) 46. Philadelphia, PA: 0.6 Bcfd (Freedom Energy Center - PGW) 47. Astoria, OR: 1.0 Bcfd (Skipanon LNG - Calpine) POTENTIAL CANADIAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 48. Quebec City, QC : 0.5 Bcfd (Project Rabaska - Enbridge/Gaz Met/Gaz de France) 49. Rivière-du- Loup, QC: 0.5 Bcfd (Cacouna Energy - TransCanada/PetroCanada) 50. Kitimat, BC: 0.61 Bcfd (Galveston LNG) 51. Prince Rupert, BC: 0.30 Bcfd (WestPac Terminals) 52. Goldboro, NS 1.0 Bcfd (Keltic Petrochemicals) POTENTIAL MEXICAN SITES IDENTIFIED BY PROJECT SPONSORS 53. Lázaro Cárdenas, MX : 0.5 Bcfd (Tractebel/Repsol) 54. Puerto Libertad, MX: 1.3 Bcfd (Sonora Pacific LNG) 55. Offshore Gulf, MX: 1.0 Bcfd (Dorado - Tidelands) 56. Manzanillo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd 57. Topolobampo, MX: 0.5 Bcfd Potential North American LNG Terminals FERC Office of Energy Projects 43 42 40 US Jurisdiction FERC US Coast Guard 41 46 45 44 47 55 48 49 51 50 52 53 54 56 57 As of July 1, 2005

31. FERC 31 LNG Onshore Project Status - Approved Projects* * Status as of July 1, 2005 FERC Office of Energy Projects Applications Approved: Status of Construction Trunkline, Lake Charles Expansion (CP02-60) #1 Underway, Service 4th Q ’05 Sempra, Cameron LNG (CP02-374) #2 Underway, Amendment Authorized AES, Ocean Express Pipeline (CP02-90) #3 Amendment Authorized Tractebel, Calypso Pipeline (CP01-409) #4 Pending Freeport LNG (CP03-75) #5 Construction Clearance Authorized

32. FERC 32 Applications Approved: Status of Construction Cheniere LNG - Sabine, LA (CP04-47) #6 Authorized Southern LNG – Elba Island (CP02-380) #7 Underway Cheniere, Corpus Christi (CP04-37) #8 Pending Vista Del Sol, Corpus Christi (CP04-395) #9 Pending Weaver’s Cove Energy, Fall River (CP04-36) #10 Pending Exxon Mobil, Golden Pass (CP04-386) #11 Pending LNG Onshore Project Status - Approved Projects* FERC Office of Energy Projects * Status as of July 1, 2005

33. FERC 33 FERC Office of Energy Projects As of July 1, 2005 Rejected LNG Onshore Projects Applications Rejected: Keyspan, Providence (CP04-223)

34. FERC 34 Onshore LNG Project Status* Pre-Filing: Broadwater, LI Sound (PF05-04) #25 Gulf Energy, Pascagoula (PF05-05) #26 Casotte Landing, Pascagoula (PF05-09) #28 Creole Trail, Cameron (PF05-08) #29 Northern Star, Bradwood (PF05-10) #27 FERC Office of Energy Projects * Status as of July 1, 2005

35. FERC 35 Applications Filed: Working on DEIS - Sound Energy Solutions, Long Beach (PF03-6, CP04-58) #19 -Sempra, Port Arthur (PF04-11, CP05-83) #23 -Calhoun LNG, Port Lavaca (CP05-91) #30 -Dominion, Cove Point (PF04-15, CP05-130) #24 -Freeport Expansion (CP05-361) #31 Onshore LNG Project Status* FERC Office of Energy Projects * Status as of July 1, 2005

36. FERC 36 Applications Filed: Working on FEIS –BP, Crown Landing (PF04-2, CP04-411) #20 –Ingleside/Occidental, Corpus Christi (CP05-11) #22 Onshore LNG Project Status* FERC Office of Energy Projects * Status as of July 1, 2005

37. FERC 37 Filed at FERC : El Paso, Seafarer (PF04-08, CP05-25) #21 Excelerate Energy, Northeast Gateway (CP05-383) #39 Applications Filed: Working on DEIS with USCG Freeport-McMoran, Main Pass (CP04-68) #34 Working ON FEIS with USCG Conoco Phillips, Compass Port (CP04-114) #35 Exxon Mobil, Pearl Crossing (CP04-374) #36 LNG Project Status - Associated Pipelines* FERC Office of Energy Projects * Status as of July 1, 2005

38. Office of Energy Projects 38 Pleasant Point, ME (43) Everett, MA (A) Offshore Boston - Neptune (38) Fall River, MA (10) Somerset, MA (41) Legend: Existing Terminal Approved Terminal Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing Proposed Terminal: Filed Working on DEIS Working on FEIS Potential Terminal North East LNG Terminals July 1, 2005 Offshore Boston - Excelerate (39) Providence, RI Rejected

39. Office of Energy Projects 39 Legend: Existing Terminal Approved Terminal Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing Proposed Terminal: Filed Working on DEIS Working on FEIS Potential Terminal Cove Point, MD (B/24) Logan Township, NJ (20) Mid-Atlantic LNG Terminals Long Island Sound, NY (25) Philadelphia, PA (46) July 1, 2005

40. Office of Energy Projects 40 South East LNG Terminals Elba Island, GA (C/7) Bahamas (3/4/21) Legend: Existing Terminal Approved Terminal Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing Proposed Terminal: Filed Working on DEIS Working on FEIS Potential Terminal (Pipelines only) July 1, 2005

41. Office of Energy Projects 41 Corpus Christi, TX (8) Lake Charles, LA (D/1) Port Pelican (12) Pearl Crossing (36) Freeport, TX (5/31) Golden Pass (11) Port Lavaca, TX (30) Port Arthur (23) Sabine Pass, LA (6) Gulf Coast LNG Terminals Freeport McMoran (34) Hackberry (2) Gulf Landing (13) Compass Port (35) Legend: Existing Terminal Approved Terminal Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing Proposed Terminal: Filed Working on DEIS Working on FEIS Potential Terminal Galveston, TX (45) Pascagoula, MS (26/28) Cameron (29) Beacon Port (37) Gulf Gateway (E) Vista Del Sol (9) Ingleside LNG (22) July 1, 2005

42. Office of Energy Projects 42 Long Beach, CA (19) California Offshore (32/33/42) Southwest LNG Terminals Chevron Texaco (42) BHP Billiton (32) Crystal Energy (33) Legend: Existing Terminal Approved Terminal Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing Proposed Terminal: Filed Working on DEIS Working on FEIS Potential Terminal July 1, 2005

43. FERC 43 Office of Energy Projects 43 North West LNG Terminals Coos Bay, OR (40) Bradwood, OR (27) Legend: Existing Terminal Approved Terminal Proposed Terminal: Pre-Filing Proposed Terminal: Filed Working on DEIS Working on FEIS Potential Terminal Astoria, OR (47) St. Helens, OR (44) July 1, 2005