Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJonathan Boone Modified over 9 years ago
1
Colin J. MacDougall
2
Class of Systems and Applications “Employ distributed resources to perform a critical function in a decentralized manner” Distributed Resources ◦ Computing power, storage, bandwidth, etc. Critical Functions ◦ Distributed computing, data sharing, communication, etc. Decentralization ◦ Algorithms, data, meta-data
4
Pre 1980s ◦ Telephony – Communication between peers 1980s – Early 1990s ◦ FTP with Archie indexing Mid 1990s ◦ Abandoned in favor of client-server 1999 ◦ Napster 2000s ◦ SETI@home, Gnutella, JXTA,.NET, Groove,...
5
Cost Sharing and Reduction ◦ Server normally handles the brunt of costs ◦ Peers can share costs between them ◦ Ex. Napster shared storage space among peers Resource Aggregation and Interoperability ◦ Huge amounts of storage, computation available ◦ Sum of peer’s resources is accessible ◦ Ex. SETI@home is faster than the fastest supercomputer in the world (as of 2003)
6
Improved Scalability and Reliability ◦ P2P has no (or little) central authority ◦ Must be able to locate resources in a network of peers ◦ Must remain operative when peers disconnect or networks fail Increased Autonomy ◦ Local nodes do work on behalf of their users ◦ Users have control over their data and work
7
Anonymity ◦ Of Author, Publisher, Reader, Server, Document, Query ◦ Uses multicasting, covert paths, identity spoofing, non-voluntary placement, encryption, etc. Dynamism ◦ Peers join and drop the network continuously ◦ Must be able to allocate work to new resources ◦ Must be able to recover from uncompleted work on dropped resources
8
Distributed Computing ◦ Sharing a computation intensive task between peers ◦ Ex. SETI@home File Sharing ◦ Storing information on and retrieving information from peers ◦ Ex. Napster, Gnutella Communication & Collaboration ◦ User interaction without central server ◦ Ex. Instant Messaging Platforms ◦ Contain some capacity for all of the above services ◦ Serve as an environment for P2P applications ◦ Ex. JXTA,.NET
9
Divide problem into small, independent parts Limited to embarrassingly parallel problems ◦ Cluster-like communication ruled out by network latency ◦ Single Process Multiple Data Financial Applications ◦ Complex market simulations Portfolio pricing, risk hedge calculation, credit evaluation, etc. ◦ Security concerns Biotech Applications ◦ Genome@home, Folding@home
10
Content storage and exchange Circumvent bandwidth limitations Technical Issues ◦ Network Consumption ◦ Security ◦ Search Capabilities
11
Instant messaging, online games, shared applications Generally event-driven Technical Challenges ◦ Location of peers ◦ Fault Tolerance ◦ Realtime Constraints
12
Execution environments providing layer between OS and applications Support primary P2P components ◦ Naming, discovery, communication, security, aggregation
16
D.S. Milojicic, V. Kalogeraki, R. Lukose, K. Nagaraja, J. Pruyne, B. Richard, S. Rollins, Z. Xu, Peer-to-peer computing, Technical Report HPL-2002-57R1, HP Laboratories, Palo Alto, USA, 3 July 2003
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.