Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAshlyn Walsh Modified over 8 years ago
1
Project Manager: Chase Chapman Assistant Manager: Ryan Hilliard GIS Analyst: Jason Snyder Web Master: Marques Green
2
Introduction & Scope Final Output Project Data Methodology Results Issues Recommendations Conclusion Final Deliverables Contacts and Questions
3
City’s Current Housing Condition
4
Hays County San Marcos City Limits City of San Marcos Housing
5
Base Map of San Marcos County_Boundary- Showed the extent of Hays County Right_of_Way- Showed the streets in San Marcos Street_Map_USA- Background for the streets Single Family Data SF_Parcels- showed the locations of the properties Attribute table had the 2008 tax data Parcel_Imp_Val- Joined with the tax data to show values of the properties Neighborhood NeighborhoodAvgCost- Shows the average values for the 39 neighborhoods with associations
9
Created a map showing the disparity in home values based on the single family parcel data provided by the City of San Marcos. The value thresholds of affordability were determined by the planning staff of San Marcos based on the U.S. Census Bureau 2005-2007 3-year Estimated Median Family Income. To calculate the mortgage amount lower and upper limits for each threshold, the planning staff assumed the following: A 30-year fixed rate mortgage at 6.5% No down payment 5% carrying costs for insurance, property taxes and utilities Housing CategoryLower Limit ValueUpper Limit Value Below Entry$0$82,400 Entry$82,400$131,800 Workforce$131,800$164,700 Upper-Level$164,700$197,700 Executive$197,700Unlimited
12
This is an ideal housing situation. Out of all of the parcels in the study, 29.87% fell into the below entry threshold category and 29.60% fell into the entry level threshold category. This means that 59.47% of all the parcels in the study were in a price range lower than $131,800, while 76.58% fell below the upper limit workforce threshold of $164,700. Further detail is provided in the threshold percentage graphs.
13
Initially, we tried to get updated census data to make the map more precise by today’s (2009) standards. The census data was from 2000 and the tax data was from 2008, which was not a big problem, but we could not get the other part of our project going without it. When we tried making a formula for producing an updated Household income data, but that became too complex for the project. Much time and money was lost in trying to manipulate past income figures into current ones. Issues may also arise in how the blocks are laid out across the area due to their irregular shapes and sizes.
14
TexGIS would also recommend using a metadata assistant. After the 2010 Census is released, I would plug in the new information and run the analysis again to get a more relevant picture to today’s economy.
15
TexGIS initially started this project with the idea that San Marcos was lacking in affordable housing for its residents. Based on this analysis, San Marcos has an abundance of affordable housing and many well established neighborhoods that can be deemed affordable based on housing value averages.
17
Chase Chapman cc1446@txstate.edu cc1446@txstate.edu (281) 450-4828 Ryan Hilliard–Assistant Manager rh1224@txstate.edu rh1224@txstate.edu (832) 363-7440 Jason Snyder– GIS Analyst js1874@txstate.edu js1874@txstate.edu (512) 925-0823 Marques Green –Web Master (512) 633-8031 mg1346@txstate.edu mg1346@txstate.edu
18
(2) Reports Maps (2) CD’s All data Metadata Proposal, Progress, Final Reports Poster Power Point presentations Website
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.