Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012."— Presentation transcript:

1 Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012

2 Welcome The mission of the Parkway School District is to ensure all students are capable, curious and confident learners who understand and respond to the challenges of an ever- changing world.

3 Norms for Working Together  Listen to understand  Mission focused  Well-planned agenda  Active and respectful participation

4 Essential Question Mission Accomplished - Parkway 2016 “How do we get from here to there?”

5 Agenda  Welcome  Review Norms  Professional Learning Communities  Evaluation Model  Attendance Policy  NCLB Waiver

6 Building Community Stand Up, Hand Up, Pair Up Find someone you don’t usually work with Share your favorite summer vacation memory OR what you did this summer

7 Starting a Movement Movement

8 Focus Question: Question Storm  Write 3 – 5 Questions on Post-It Notes  With your table sort your questions into categories and label the categories  What is the most important question your table would like answered?

9 Professional Learning and Evaluation Model

10 Attendance Policy

11 NCLB Waiver  Implements higher academic standards  Creates one state system of accountability  Allows for flexible Title 1 spending  Focuses on school improvement  Improves teacher evaluation system

12 ESEA Flexibility Waiver Principle 1: College and Career Ready Expectations for All Students Principle 2: State Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability and Support Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

13 Principle 1: College and Career Readiness Core Academic Standards  Common Core State Standards  Next Generation Science Standards  Career Education Standards  Updated Standards Health/PE Health/PE World Language World Language Fine Arts Fine Arts Guidance and Counseling Guidance and Counseling Social Studies Social Studies

14 Assessment Consortiums  Smarter Balance  Dynamic Learning MAPS (replacing MAP A)  ASSETS  Technology Readiness * State Funding * State Funding

15 Prior AYP AMOs - ALL MathematicsEnglish Language Arts Year AMO 2012 81.7%83.7% 2013 90.8%91.8% 2014 100.0%

16 Flexibility from Ineffectual Identification of Schools

17 2012 Annual Measurable Objectives  Gap Group  Reporting as Gap Group for accountability  Reporting of student groups for district/school planning  Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs)  Set through 2020  Increase by 25% *Complete chart on assessment webpage

18 AMO for 2012 AMO for 2012  ELA  Total 56.2%  Gap Group 44.21%  Math  Total 56.4%  Gap Group 44.78%

19 School Classifications  Based on Gap Group scores  Reward  Focus  Priority  Support

20 Schools Receiving Title 1 Funds  School Choice  Supplemental Educational Services  School Improvement Plans  Flexibility of funds  School Improvement Plan

21 EOC Testing in Middle School  End-of-course scores used for accountability the year test is administered  Proficient Algebra I score prior to 9 th grade = must take Algebra II end-of-course  Non-proficient Algebra I prior to 9 th grade = must participate in Algebra I or Algebra II in high school  Algebra I end-of-course prior to 9 th grade may replace grade-level assessment (timing will be tricky)

22 Principle 3: Supporting Effective Instruction and Leadership

23 Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation  Measure educator against research-based proven practices associated with the improvement of student performance.  Use multiple ratings to differentiate levels of performance.  Highlights a probationary period of adequate duration to ensure sufficient induction and socialization support for new teachers and leaders.  Includes measures of growth in student learning as a significant part of the evaluation of professional practice at all levels.

24 Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation  Provides ongoing, timely, deliberate and meaningful feedback on performance relative to research-based targets.  Requires standardized, periodic training for evaluators to ensure reliability and accuracy  Utilizes the results and data to inform decisions regarding personnel, employment determinations and policy regarding employment

25 Next Steps  Committee to evaluate alignment and make recommendation  Participate in state level evaluation of state model  Finalize plan this coming winter

26 Connection to MSIP Cycle 5  August 1st (today): MSIP 4 th Cycle APR (SECURE)  August 8th: Re-publish refreshed MSIP 4 th Cycle APR  August 14 th : Final MSIP 4 th Cycle APR Public  October 1 st (tentative): MSIP Cycle 5 Draft  December 3 rd : Draft MSIP Cycle 5 publicly posted

27 Highlights of MSIP Cycle 5  Academic Achievement  Subgroup Achievement  College and Career Readiness  Attendance Rate  Graduation Rate

28 Academic Achievement  Multiple Measures  Status – 3 Year  Progress – Gap Group Reduction  Growth Model  Goal: Cut Gap Group in Half by 2020

29 College and Career Ready  Percentage of students at or above state standard on ACT, SAT, ASVAB, COMPASS  District’s average composite on above assessments  Percent of graduates who participate  Percentage of students who earned qualifying score on AP, IB, Technical Skills Assessment and/or receive college credit  Percentage of students who attend post secondary or military within 6 months  Percentage of students who complete career education programs within 6 months All require to meet or exceed standard or demonstrates required growth

30  Graduate File  Unduplicated Count  Highest Score  No Full-Academic Year  Status  Progress

31 Attendance  Individual Student Attendance Rate  90% personal attendance to get points in formula  3 year rolling average  Progress - % increase

32 Graduation Rate  Five Year Adjusted Cohort Rate for accountability  Status  Progress  Four Year Adjusted Cohort for reporting

33 Accreditation Levels  Accredited with Distinction: 90 – 100%  Estimated 109 districts (20.9%)  Accredited : 70 – 89%  Estimated 355 districts (68.1%)  Provisional: 50 – 69%  Estimated 50 districts (9.6%)  Unaccredited: 0 -49%  Estimated 7 districts (1.4%)

34 Want more?  Let Nathan and me know… we will offer some sessions!  I know you can’t wait!

35 Next Steps  Review of Data  Public Relations

36 Questions

37


Download ppt "Principal Professional Learning Team August 2012."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google